journal article Open Access Feb 03, 2026

Risk Governance in Clinical Education for Healthcare Students: A Scoping Review

View at Publisher Save 10.1111/tct.70355
Abstract
ABSTRACT

Background
Clinical education is essential for the training and accreditation of healthcare students. It facilitates hands‐on application and prepares students for their future roles in a dynamic and complex workforce. However, such clinical exposure comes with inherent risk, not least due to the delicate balance between patient safety and student learning. Understanding risk is particularly crucial now as we confront new technologies that will undoubtedly transform clinical education. This scoping review aims to map current practices of tertiary institutions in managing risks and incidents in healthcare students' clinical education.


Methods
This scoping review adhered to the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology and was reported in accordance with PRISMA‐ScR guidelines. The search strategy considered key terms of ‘risk’, ‘clinical’ and ‘students’ in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and grey literature. An inductive‐deductive approach was used for thematic data analysis.


Results
We included 21 studies, which addressed risks in patient safety, student safety and incident response. Twelve studies reported on existing local practices, whereas nine evaluated new interventions. Ten studies intervened at the student level with education programmes, and 11 intervened at the faculty level with protocols and policies. Included studies involved students from medicine, nursing, dentistry, physiotherapy and psychology, with one study involving multiple disciplines.


Conclusions
Risk governance in clinical education is an emerging field, with faculties at various stages of establishing a risk governance framework. Key requisites for risk governance are robust and streamlined processes for incident reporting, incident response and policy change. Further research is needed to understand the impact of centralised multidisciplinary governance.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
50
[1]
Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency.Registration Standards 2024 [updated 17 June 2024 Accessed 18 April 2025].https://www.ahpra.gov.au/Registration/Continuing‐Professional‐Development.aspx.
[2]
(2002)
[3]
Chiou S.‐F. "The Development of an Incident Event Reporting System for Nursing Students" Studies in Health Technology and Informatics (2009)
[4]
The global burden of unsafe medical care: analytic modelling of observational studies

Ashish K Jha, Itziar Larizgoitia, Carmen Audera-Lopez et al.

BMJ Quality & Safety 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001748
[6]
Hopkin P. (2017)
[15]
Chiou S.‐F. "Learning From an Incident Reporting System: Developing a Strategy to Prevent Medication Errors Among Nursing Students" Studies in Health Technology and Informatics (2021)
[16]
Naresh L. "Musculoskeletal Disorders and Contributing Factors Among Student Nurses" Manipal Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences (2023)
[19]
Faculty of Medicine Dentisty and Health Sciences.CESAR.2024.https://mdhs.unimelb.edu.au/study/clinical‐education‐risk‐and‐governance/governance‐cesar‐and‐spag/cesar.
[22]
Peters M. (2020)
[23]
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

Andrea C. Tricco, Erin Lillie, Wasifa Zarin et al.

Annals of Internal Medicine 10.7326/m18-0850
[24]
Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

Hilary Arksey, Lisa O'Malley

International Journal of Social Research Methodolo... 10.1080/1364557032000119616
[25]
Using thematic analysis in psychology

Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke

Qualitative Research in Psychology 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[26]
Scoping studies: advancing the methodology

Danielle Levac, Heather Colquhoun, Kelly K O'Brien

Implementation Science 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
[27]
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

J. Richard Landis, Gary G. Koch

Biometrics 10.2307/2529310
[30]
Gil‐Hernández E. "Development and Implementation of a Safety Incident Report System for Health Care Discipline Students During Clinical Internships: Observational Study. JMIR" Medical Education (2024)
[35]
What Do I Do When Something Goes Wrong? Teaching Medical Students to Identify, Understand, and Engage in Reporting Medical Errors

Hilary F. Ryder, Jonathan T. Huntington, Alan West et al.

Academic Medicine 10.1097/acm.0000000000002872
[48]
A global overview of healthcare workers’ turnover intention amid COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review with future directions

Yuan-Sheng Ryan Poon, Yongxing Patrick Lin, Peter Griffiths et al.

Human Resources for Health 10.1186/s12960-022-00764-7
Metrics
0
Citations
50
References
Details
Published
Feb 03, 2026
Vol/Issue
23(2)
License
View
Cite This Article
Raelynn R. Tong, Je Min Suh, Lisa Cheshire, et al. (2026). Risk Governance in Clinical Education for Healthcare Students: A Scoping Review. The Clinical Teacher, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.70355
Related

You May Also Like

‘The Diamond’: a structure for simulation debrief

Peter Jaye, Libby Thomas · 2015

218 citations

The benefits of being a near‐peer teacher

Samuel Hall, Charlotte H Harrison · 2018

79 citations

Cognitive learning theory for clinical teaching

Jakob I McSparron, Anita Vanka · 2018

26 citations