Privatising asylum: neoliberalisation, depoliticisation and the governance of forced migration

Jonathan Darling

doi:10.1111/tran.12118

journal article Open Access Mar 23, 2016

Privatising asylum: neoliberalisation, depoliticisation and the governance of forced migration

Jonathan Darling

Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers Vol. 41 No. 3 pp. 230-243 · Wiley

View at Publisher Save 10.1111/tran.12118

Abstract

This paper critically examines the political geography of asylum accommodation in the UK, arguing that in the regulation of housing and support services we witness the depoliticisation of asylum. In 2010, the UK Home Office announced that it would be passing contracts to provide accommodation and reception services for asylum seekers to a series of private providers, meaning the end of local authority control over asylum housing. This paper explores the impact of this shift and argues that the result is the production of an asylum market, in which neoliberal norms of market competition, economic efficiency and dispersed responsibility are central. In drawing on interviews with local authorities, politicians and asylum support services in four cities, the paper argues that the privatisation of accommodation has seen the emergence of new assemblages of authority, policy and governance. When combined with a market‐oriented transfer of responsibilities, depoliticisation acts to constrain the possibilities of political debate and to predetermine the contours of those policy discussions that do take place. In making this case, the paper challenges the closures of work on post‐politics, and argues for an exploration of the situated modalities of practice through which forms of depoliticisation interact with, and are constituted by, processes of neoliberalisation. In this context, the framing of asylum seekers as a ‘burden’ emerges as a discursive and symbolic achievement of the neoliberal politics of asylum accommodation. Framing asylum seekers as a burden represents both a move to position asylum as a specific and managerial issue, and at the same time reiterates an economic account of asylum as a question of resource allocation, cost and productivity.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

83

[1]

10.1068/a40208

[2]

10.1080/13621025.2011.583787

[3]

Badiou A (2003)

[4]

10.2307/j.ctt9qgsgv

[5]

Beveridge R "Global norms, local contestation: privatisation and de/politicisation in Berlin" Policy & Politics (2014)

[6]

10.1177/0042098014549292

[7]

10.1080/0141987042000337858

[8]

BloxhamA2010Birmingham stops accepting asylum seekersThe Daily Telegraph8 October

[9]

10.1093/jrs/16.3.316

[10]

10.1111/1467-8330.00246

[11]

10.1177/0090591706293016

[12]

10.2307/j.ctt17kk9p8

[13]

10.1111/1467-856x.00054

[14]

10.1177/0263276407084701

[15]

10.1177/0170840605056393

[16]

10.1017/s0047279403007244

[17]

Clarke J (1997)

[18]

10.1002/9781444324655

[19]

10.1080/14650045.2011.562940

[20]

10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.04.011

[21]

10.1111/anti.12026

[22]

10.1177/0309132516629004

[23]

Darling J (2016)

[24]

10.1215/9780822390923

[25]

10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00460.x

[26]

10.1525/ae.2002.29.4.981

[27]

10.1111/j.1467-856x.2005.00205.x

[28]

10.1332/030557312x655945

[29]

10.1057/9780230594180

[30]

10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.05.003

[31]

10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.10.008

[32]

GledhillL K2014No ‘place’ for home: stories of discomfort and depoliticisation in the privatisation of dispersal accommodation in Yorkshire and HumbersideUCL Migration Research Unit Working Paper No. 2014/6 (http://www.geog.ucl.ac.uk/research/transnational-spaces/migration-research-unit/working-papers/Lorna%20Kate%20Gledhill%202014%206.pdf) Accessed 18 May 2015

[33]

10.1111/1467-8330.00248

[34]

10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001

[35]

10.1068/a45121

[36]

Hay C (2007)

[37]

10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00732.x

[38]

Home Affairs Select Committee2013Oral evidence taken before the Home Affairs Committee: AsylumTuesday 25thJune 2013(http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmhaff/uc71-iii/uc71.pdf) Accessed 27 May 2015

[39]

Home Office (1998)

[40]

Contemporary Compulsory Dispersal and the Absence of Space for the Restoration of Trust

P. Hynes

Journal of Refugee Studies 2009 10.1093/jrs/fen049

[41]

10.2307/j.ctt9qgrp9

[42]

Hynes P (2010) 10.1007/978-1-137-07924-4_3

[43]

10.1332/030557312x655864

[44]

10.1080/19187033.2000.11675231

[45]

10.3366/edinburgh/9780748682973.003.0010

[46]

10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00504.x

[47]

10.1080/03085140120042271

[48]

10.1177/0042098011415715

[49]

10.1177/1462474505048133

[50]

Practices of assemblage and community forest management

Tania Murray Li

Economy and Society 10.1080/03085140701254308

Showing 50 of 83 references

Cited By

114

Politics of Subsidiarity in Refugee Reception: Comparative Perspectives

Ayhan Kaya, Alexander K. Nagel · 2021

Journal of Immigrant & Refugee...

Innovative strategies for the reception of asylum seekers and refugees in European cities: multi-level governance, multi-sector urban networks and local engagement

Caroline Oliver, Rianne Dekker · 2020

Comparative Migration Studies

Metrics

114

Citations

83

References

Details

Published: Mar 23, 2016
Vol/Issue: 41(3)
Pages: 230-243
License: View

Authors

J

Jonathan Darling

Geography School of Environment, Education and Development University of Manchester Manchester M13 9PL

Cite This Article

Jonathan Darling (2016). Privatising asylum: neoliberalisation, depoliticisation and the governance of forced migration. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41(3), 230-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12118

Privatising asylum: neoliberalisation, depoliticisation and the governance of forced migration

You May Also Like