journal article Open Access Sep 01, 2024

Validation of the Sysmex XN‐V hematology analyzer for feline specimens

Veterinary Clinical Pathology Vol. 53 No. 3 pp. 294-308 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1111/vcp.13377
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundThe Sysmex XN‐V is derived from the new Sysmex XN series of human hematology analyzers. The main changes from the previously validated XT‐2000iV analyzer include an optic‐fluorescent analysis for platelets and a nucleated red blood cell (NRBC) count.ObjectiveWe aimed to validate the Sysmex XN‐V for feline blood following the American College for Veterinary Clinical Pathology and International Council for Standardization in Hematology recommendations.MethodsFeline EDTA blood specimens were analyzed on the Sysmex XN‐V to evaluate repeatability, linearity, comparison with the XT‐2000iV analyzer and manual methods, stability, and to verify the previously established Sysmex XT‐2000iV RIs.ResultsRepeatability was excellent for most variables. Visually determined linearity was excellent or good for most variables except eosinophils and platelet variables. The correlation between the XN‐V and XT‐2000iV analyzers was good (≥0.82) for all variables except reticulocyte indices. Correlations between the Sysmex XN‐V and manual differential counts were good to excellent for most variables, acceptable for neutrophils, and fair for monocytes and NRBC. The previously established Sysmex XT‐2000iV RIs can be used to interpret results from the Sysmex XN‐V analyzer for most variables except red cell distribution width and reticulocyte variables. The RI for platelet variables could not be evaluated because of platelet clumps. Changes in the Sysmex XN‐V measurements after storage at 4 and 24°C were similar to those described for the Sysmex XT‐2000iV analyzer.ConclusionsThe performance of the Sysmex XN‐V analyzer was good and compared favorably with the Sysmex XT‐2000iV analyzer.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
20
[4]
ASVCPGuidelines: Principles of Quality Assurance and Standards for Veterinary Clinical Pathology (version 3.0)

Jill E. Arnold, Melinda S. Camus, Kathy P. Freeman et al.

Veterinary Clinical Pathology 10.1111/vcp.12810
[5]
FriedrichsK BarnhartK BlancoJ et al.ASVCP Quality Assurance and Laboratory Standards Committee (QALS). Guidelines for the determination of reference intervals in veterinary species and other related topics: SCOPE. Accessed April 2020.https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.asvcp.org/resource/resmgr/QALS/Other_Publications/RI_Guidelines_For_ASVCP_webs.pdf
[9]
Tvedten H (2010)
[10]
CLSI.Defining Establishing and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline. 3rd ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Document EP28‐A3c. Wayne PA; 2010.
[13]
Evaluation of the automated hematology analyzer Sysmex XT-2000iV™ compared to the ADVIA® 2120 for its use in dogs, cats, and horses. Part II

Natali Bauer, Julia Nakagawa, Cathrin Dunker et al.

Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 10.1177/1040638711436243
Metrics
7
Citations
20
References
Details
Published
Sep 01, 2024
Vol/Issue
53(3)
Pages
294-308
License
View
Cite This Article
Maud Guerlin, Fanny Granat, Margot Grebert, et al. (2024). Validation of the Sysmex XN‐V hematology analyzer for feline specimens. Veterinary Clinical Pathology, 53(3), 294-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/vcp.13377