journal article Jan 16, 2018

Linking species traits to agroecosystem services: a functional analysis of weed communities

Weed Research Vol. 58 No. 2 pp. 76-88 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1111/wre.12283
Abstract
SummaryThere is a growing interest in the use of functional approaches for the study of weed assemblages, to disentangle underlying processes determining their composition and dynamics. Functional approaches are based on the assumption that weed community composition and dynamics can be best explained by a set of species traits expressing their response to agricultural disturbance. This knowledge should help develop more sustainable, ecologically based weed management systems. Trait‐based data required for this kind of analysis are available from various sources, but most of them either cover mainly non‐weedy species or, in the case of weed‐focussed trait databases, they cover a limited number of species. In this work, we present a trait database for 240 weed species common throughout Europe, including not only response traits but also effect traits, that is linked to selected agroecosystem services and disservices. A case study is presented where our weed trait database is used in conjunction with appropriate statistical analysis to highlight the distribution of weed functional groups in soyabean crop communities from an experiment including different tillage and weed management systems. Finally, we discuss the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of this functional approach. By highlighting the links between weed species and agroecosystem (dis)services, this approach could be a useful resource for scientists, farm managers and policymakers.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
52
[4]
Bolòs O (2005)
[14]
FontX(2016)Mòdul Flora i Vegetació. Banc de Dades de Biodiversitat de Catalunya. (Generalitat de Catalunya i Universitat de Barcelona). Available at:http://biodiver.bio.ub.es/biocat/homepage.html(last accessed 11 May 2016).
[18]
Garnier E (2016)
[20]
Grime J (2007)
[24]
HodgsonJ(2016)Allocating C‐S‐R types to plant species. Available at:http://people.exeter.ac.uk/rh203/csr_lookup_table.xls(last accessed 11 May 2016).
[28]
Kew Royal Botanical Gardens(2016)Seed Information Database (SID). Version 7.1. Available at:http://data.kew.org/sid(last accessed 11 May 2016).
[31]
Klotz S "BIOLFLOR ‐ Eine Datenbank zu biologisch‐ökologischen Merkmalen zur Flora von Deutschland" Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde (2002)
[36]
Missouri botanical Garden(2016)Published on the Internet.http://www.efloras.org(last accessed 11 May 2016).
[41]
Pignatti S (1982)
[42]
Pignatti S "Biondicazione attraverso le piante vascolari. Valori di indicazione secondo Ellenberg (Zeigerwerte) per le specie della Flora d'Italia. [Bioindication through vascular plants. Indicator values according to Ellenberg for species of Italian Flora]" Braun‐Blanquetia (2005)
[43]
R Development Core Team (2011)
[44]
Raunkiær C (1934)
[47]
SansFX ArmengotL Blanco‐MorenoJM BocciG CarlesiS&BàrberiP(2014)Effect of conservation practices on functional diversity and assembly of weed communities: a database of functional traits. In:Proceedings 18th IFOAM Organic World Congress(edsGRahmann&UAksoy) Istanbul (Turkey) 13‐15 October 977–978.

Showing 50 of 52 references

Cited By
70
Agronomy for Sustainable Developmen...
Related

You May Also Like

A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals

J. C. ZADOKS, T. T. Chang · 1974

7,893 citations

What good is weed diversity?

J Storkey, P Neve · 2018

205 citations