journal article Sep 16, 2016

Bats perceptually weight prey cues across sensory systems when hunting in noise

View at Publisher Save 10.1126/science.aaf7934
Abstract
Anthropogenic noise can interfere with environmental information processing and thereby reduce survival and reproduction. Receivers of signals and cues in particular depend on perceptual strategies to adjust to noisy conditions. We found that predators that hunt using prey sounds can reduce the negative impact of noise by making use of prey cues conveyed through additional sensory systems. In the presence of masking noise, but not in its absence, frog-eating bats preferred and were faster in attacking a robotic frog emitting multiple sensory cues. The behavioral changes induced by masking noise were accompanied by an increase in active localization through echolocation. Our findings help to reveal how animals can adapt to anthropogenic noise and have implications for the role of sensory ecology in driving species interactions.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
33
[2]
Anthropogenic noise increases fish mortality by predation

Stephen D. Simpson, Andrew N. Radford, Sophie L. Nedelec et al.

Nature Communications 10.1038/ncomms10544
[12]
T. H. Kunz M. B. Fenton Bat Ecology Vol. 1 (Univ. of Chicago Press 2006).
[17]
B. E. Stein The New Handbook of Multisensory Processing (MIT Press 2012). 10.7551/mitpress/8466.001.0001
[28]
Visual Contribution to Speech Intelligibility in Noise

W. H. Sumby, Irwin Pollack

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 10.1121/1.1907309
[31]
SiemersB. M.StilzP.SchnitzlerH. U., The acoustic advantage of hunting at low heights above water: Behavioural experiments on the European ‘trawling’ bats Myotis capaccinii, M. dasycneme and M. daubentonii. J. Exp. Biol. 204, 3843–3854 (2001).11807102 10.1242/jeb.204.22.3843
[32]
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna 2012).
[33]
A. Zuur E. N. Ieno N. Walker A. A. Saveliev G. M. Smith Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R (Springer Science & Business Media 2009). 10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6
Cited By
103
Why conservation biology can benefit from sensory ecology

Davide M. Dominoni, Wouter Halfwerk · 2020

Nature Ecology & Evolution
Effects of environmental factors on microbiota of fruits and soil of Coffea arabica in Brazil

Tomás Gomes Reis Veloso, Marliane de Cássia Soares da Silva · 2020

Scientific Reports
Nature Ecology & Evolution
Related

You May Also Like

Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films

K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim · 2004

61,289 citations

Optimization by Simulated Annealing

S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt · 1983

44,123 citations

Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks

Albert-László Barabási, Réka Albert · 1999

35,859 citations

Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases

Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman · 1974

27,432 citations

The Tragedy of the Commons

Garrett Hardin · 1968

22,676 citations