journal article Apr 24, 2008

GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

BMJ Vol. 336 No. 7650 pp. 924-926 · BMJ
View at Publisher Save 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

Cited By
17,760
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
Evidence contamination: what it is and why it matters

Chang Xu, Luis Furuya-Kanamori · 2026

BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
Long-Term Olfactory Dysfunction in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review

Artemis Zarkadi, Michail Katotomichelakis · 2026

Cureus
Journal of Ophthalmology and Advanc...
JAMA Surgery
Metrics
17,760
Citations
0
References
Details
Published
Apr 24, 2008
Vol/Issue
336(7650)
Pages
924-926
License
View
Cite This Article
Gordon H Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Gunn E Vist, et al. (2008). GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 336(7650), 924-926. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad
Related

You May Also Like

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie · 2021

70,966 citations

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

Julian P T Higgins, Simon G Thompson · 2003

50,962 citations

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

Matthias Egger, George Davey Smith · 1997

46,936 citations

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

J. P. T. Higgins, D. G. Altman · 2011

27,950 citations