Inputs and outputs of mercury from terrestrial watersheds: a review

D F Grigal

doi:10.1139/a01-013

journal article Mar 01, 2002

Inputs and outputs of mercury from terrestrial watersheds: a review

D F Grigal

Environmental Reviews Vol. 10 No. 1 pp. 1-39 · Canadian Science Publishing

View at Publisher Save 10.1139/a01-013

Abstract

This review focuses on mercury (Hg) inputs and outputs in temperate and boreal terrestrial systems. It covers deposition via throughfall and litterfall, whose sum (ca. 38 µg m2 a1) is greater than that via precipitation (ca. 10 µg m2 a1). Outputs considered include volatilization, soil sequestration, and streamflow. The former is highly uncertain, but the mean rate (11 ng m2 h1) over a growing season is equivalent to about 32 µg m2 a1. Modern rates of soil sequestration (ca. 5 µg m2 a1) and streamflow fluxes (ca. 2 µg m2 a1) balance the annual budget. The majority of the uncertainty in the budget is related to volatilization. Nonetheless, a large fraction of atmospheric Hg is likely a product of continuing deposition and volatilization. Watershed characteristics related to streamflow fluxes of both Hg and methylmercury (MeHg) are discussed. Both runoff concentration and flux of Hg are weakly and inversely related to watershed size. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and particulates are important carriers of Hg; watershed activities that affect either affect Hg flux. Runoff flux of MeHg is skewed with about 80% of observations less than 0.15 µg m2 a1. Although there is no pattern of MeHg flux with watershed size, there is a strong positive relationship between flux and wetland area. Wetlands are a site of MeHg production and their presence increases water residence time; both increase MeHg flux. Concentrations of MeHg in streamflow from watersheds with wetlands are near the current water quality criterion, and effective control measures in those watersheds appear problematic.Key words: deposition, non-point pollution, methylmercury, wetlands, dissolved organic carbon (DOC).

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

153

[1]

Aastrup M. Water Air Soil Pollut. (1991) 10.1007/bf00342269

[2]

Allan C.J. S.E. U.S.A. Water Air Soil Pollut. (1998) 10.1023/a:1004971824366

[3]

Babiarz C.L. Biogeochemistry (1998) 10.1023/a:1005940630948

[4]

Balogh S.J. River. Environ. Sci. Technol. (1997) 10.1021/es960327t

[5]

Balogh S. Croix Rivers. Sci. Total Environ. (1998) 10.1016/s0048-9697(98)00081-3

[6]

Balogh S.J. Environ. Sci. Technol. (1998) 10.1021/es970506q

[7]

Balogh S.J. J. Environ. Qual. (2000) 10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900030024x

[8]

Barghigiani C. Environ. Technol. (1991) 10.1080/09593339109385118

[9]

Barton S.C. Proc. Annu. Meet. Air Pollut. Cont. Assoc. 74 (#81-60.4) (1981)

[10]

Beauchamp J.J. Ecology (1973) 10.2307/1934208

[11]

Beauford W. Physiol. Plant. (1977) 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1977.tb01880.x

[12]

Bigham G.N. New York. NeuroToxicology (1996)

[13]

Bishop K. Water Air Soil Pollut. (1995) 10.1007/bf01189693

[14]

Bishop K. Water Air Soil Pollut. (1995) 10.1007/bf01189694

[15]

Bishop K.E. Biogeochemistry (1998) 10.1023/a:1005983932240

[16]

Borg H. Water Air Soil Pollut. (1989) 10.1007/bf00279334

[17]

Branfireun B.A. Water Resour. Res. (1996) 10.1029/96wr00790

[18]

Burke J. Water Air Soil Pollut. (1995) 10.1007/bf01189685

[19]

Caldwell C.A. Total Environ. (2000) 10.1016/s0048-9697(00)00554-4

[20]

Casagrande D.J. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta (1976) 10.1016/0016-7037(76)90003-x

[21]

Downs S.G. Water Air Soil Pollut. (1998) 10.1023/a:1005023916816

[22]

Driscoll C.T. Water Air Soil Pollut. (1995) 10.1007/bf01189700

[23]

The mercury cycle and fish in the Adirondack lakes

Charles T. Driscoll, Cheng Yan, Carl L. Schofield et al.

Environmental Science & Technology 1994 10.1021/es00052a003

[24]

Driscoll C.T. U.S.A. Biogeochemistry (1998) 10.1023/a:1005989229089

[25]

Du S.-H. Environ. Exp. Bot. (1982) 10.1016/0098-8472(82)90054-5

[26]

Dudas M.J. Can. J. Soil Sci. (1983) 10.4141/cjss83-038

[27]

Dudas M.J. Can. J. Soil Sci. (1976) 10.4141/cjss76-050

[28]

Dudas M.J. Can. J. Soil Sci. (1977) 10.4141/cjss77-037

[29]

Eckhardt B.W. Southern Québec. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. (1990) 10.1139/f90-173

[30]

Engstrom D.R. Midwest. Environ. Sci. Technol. (1997) 10.1021/es9600892

[31]

Fitzgerald W.F. Environ. Sci. Technol. (1998) 10.1021/es970284w

[32]

Fleck J.A., D.F. Water Air Soil Pollut. (1999) 10.1023/a:1005194608598

[33]

Garcia E. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. (1999) 10.1139/f98-164

[34]

Gill G.A. Water Air Soil Pollut. (1995) 10.1007/bf01189673

[35]

Glass G.E. U.S.A. Environ. Sci. Technol. (1999) 10.1021/es9806736

[36]

Godbold D.L. Physiol. Plant. (1988) 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1988.tb00631.x

[37]

Grigal D.F. Biogeochemistry (2000) 10.1023/a:1006322705566

[38]

Guentzel J.L. Water Air Soil Pollut. (1995) 10.1007/bf01189689

[39]

Guentzel J. Everglades. Sci. Total Environ. (1998) 10.1016/s0048-9697(98)00071-0

[40]

Hanson P.J. Water Air Soil Pollut. (1995) 10.1007/bf01189687

[41]

Helvey J.D. J. For. (1962)

[42]

Hewlett J.D. by R. Allen Freeze. Water Resour. Res. (1974) 10.1029/wr010i003p00605

[43]

Hogg T.J. J. Environ. Qual. (1978) 10.2134/jeq1978.00472425000700030030x

[44]

Hogg T.J. J. Environ. Qual. (1978) 10.2134/jeq1978.00472425000700030029x

[45]

The Rôle of infiltration in the hydrologic cycle

Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 1933 10.1029/tr014i001p00446

[46]

Hoyer M. Water Air Soil Pollut. (1995) 10.1007/bf01189668

[47]

Hultberg H. Water Air Soil Pollut. (1995) 10.1007/bf01189691

[48]

Hurley J.P. Environ. Sci. Technol. (1995) 10.1021/es00007a026

[49]

Hurley J.P. Environ. Sci. Technol. (1996) 10.1021/es9509543

[50]

Iverfeldt Water Air Soil Pollut. (1991) 10.1007/bf00342275

Showing 50 of 153 references

Metrics

353

Citations

153

References

Details

Published: Mar 01, 2002
Vol/Issue: 10(1)
Pages: 1-39
License: View

Authors

D

D F Grigal

Cite This Article

D F Grigal (2002). Inputs and outputs of mercury from terrestrial watersheds: a review. Environmental Reviews, 10(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1139/a01-013

Inputs and outputs of mercury from terrestrial watersheds: a review

You May Also Like