journal article Open Access Jan 01, 2024

Gender-based citation differences in speech–language pathology

View at Publisher Save 10.1139/facets-2023-0197
Abstract
Gender inequalities are well documented in science and typically favor male scientists. A particularly pervasive gender difference is undercitation of publications authored by women, resulting in profound negative effects on academic visibility and career advancement. This inequality has been documented in fields where author gender distributions are strongly skewed towards men (astronomy, physics, neuroscience). By investigating citation practices in a field that has traditionally been more accessible to female scientists (speech–language pathology, SLP), we demonstrate that gendered citation practices are mediated by author gender distribution in specific fields, rather than being a universal pattern. Specifically, our results revealed a citation pattern in SLP that overall tends to favor female authors, persists after controlling for potential confounding factors and, is particularly strong when female authors are citing publications involving female first and senior author teams. Our results suggest that the implementation of effective measures to increase the number and influence of underrepresented individuals in specific fields of science may contribute to mitigate downstream disadvantages for career advancement. However, future research in fields with different author gender distributions and consideration of additional mediating factors is required to establish a potential causal link between field specific authorship patterns and gendered citation inequality.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
19
[1]
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2020)
[6]
The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists

Jordan D. Dworkin, Kristin A. Linn, Erin G. Teich et al.

Nature Neuroscience 10.1038/s41593-020-0658-y
[9]
Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines

Junming Huang, Alexander J. Gates, Roberta Sinatra et al.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 10.1073/pnas.1914221117
[11]
Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions

Anais Llorens, Athina Tzovara, Ludovic Bellier et al.

Neuron 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002
[12]
The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations

Daniel Maliniak, Ryan Powers, Barbara F. Walter

International Organization 10.1017/s0020818313000209
[13]
Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks

Miller McPherson, Lynn Smith-Lovin, James M Cook

Annual Review of Sociology 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
[15]
Women are credited less in science than men

Matthew B. Ross, Britta M. Glennon, Raviv Murciano-Goroff et al.

Nature 10.1038/s41586-022-04966-w
[17]
Citation inequity and gendered citation practices in contemporary physics

Erin G. Teich, Jason Z. Kim, Christopher W. Lynn et al.

Nature Physics 10.1038/s41567-022-01770-1
[19]
Gendered citation practices in the field of communication

X. Wang, J. D. Dworkin, D. Zhou et al.

Annals of the International Communication Associat... 10.1080/23808985.2021.1960180