journal article Apr 01, 2011

Guidelines for offshore in situ testing and interpretation in deepwater soft clays

Abstract
Offshore developments for hydrocarbon resources have now progressed to water depths approaching 3000 m, with geotechnical design increasingly focused on soft sediments in the upper 30 m or so of the seabed. Due to the difficulties and high cost in recovering high-quality samples from deepwater sites, there is increasing dependence on in situ testing techniques for determining the geotechnical design parameters. This paper summarizes the findings from a joint industry project, undertaken by the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute and the Centre for Offshore Foundation Systems at The University of Western Australia, on the use of in situ testing for the characterization of deepwater soft soils. The project focused on theoretical and empirical studies for the interpretation of piezocone, T-bar, and ball penetration test data, linking the penetration resistance to shear strengths determined from in situ vane tests and laboratory tests on high-quality samples. Guidelines are summarized for interpreting in situ test data, particularly for estimating intact and remoulded undrained shear strengths from the penetration resistance measured by each type of penetrometer. Suggestions are also given for future development of in situ testing techniques to maximize the potential of in situ testing in characterization of deepwater soft soils.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
15
[1]
ASTM. 2007. Standard test method for electronic friction cone and piezocone penetration testing of soils. ASTM standard D5778-07. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Penn. 10.1520/D5778-07
[2]
ASTM. 2008. Standard test method for field vane shear test in cohesive soil. ASTM standard D2573-08. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Penn. 10.1520/D2573-01R07
[4]
Kolk, H.J., Hoope, J., and Ims, B.W. 1988. Evaluation of offshore in-situ vane test results. In Vane shear strength testing of soils: field and laboratory studies. ASTM STP 1014. Edited by A.F. Richard. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pa. pp. 339–353. 10.1520/STP10341S 10.1520/stp10341s
[9]
Lunne, T., Robertson, P.K., and Powell, J.J.M. 1997. Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice. Blackie Academic and Professional, London.
[12]
Watson, P.G. 1999. Performance of skirted foundations for offshore structures. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
[13]
Weemees, I., Howie, J., Woeller, D., Sharp, J., Cargill, E., and Greig, J. 2006. Improved techniques for in situ determination of undrained shear strength in soft clays. In Sea to Sky Geotechnics, Proceedings of the 59th Canadian Geotechnical Conference, Vancouver, B.C., 1–4 October. BiTech Publishers Ltd., Richmond, B.C. pp. 89–95.
Cited By
71
Related

You May Also Like

Characterization of geotechnical variability

Kok-Kwang Phoon, Fred H Kulhawy · 1999

2,152 citations

Model for the prediction of shear strength with respect to soil suction

S K Vanapalli, D G Fredlund · 1996

1,348 citations

Some Recent Research on the Bearing Capacity of Foundations

George Geoffrey Meyerhof · 1963

878 citations

The statistics of embankment dam failures and accidents

Mark Foster, Robin Fell · 2000

817 citations