journal article
Nov 01, 2018
"This is why we play"
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Vol. 2
No. CSCW
pp. 1-25
·
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Abstract
Professional sports constitute an important part of people's modern life. People spend substantial amounts of time and money supporting their favorite players and teams, and sometimes even riot after games. However, how team performance affects fan behavior remains understudied at a large scale. As almost every notable professional team has its own online fan community, these communities provide great opportunities for investigating this research question. In this work, we provide the first large-scale characterization of online fan communities of professional sports teams.
Since user behavior in these online fan communities is inherently connected to game events and team performance, we construct a unique dataset that combines 1.5M posts and 43M comments in NBA-related communities on Reddit with statistics that document team performance in the NBA. We analyze the impact of team performance on fan behavior both at the game level and the season level. First, we study how team performance in a game relates to user activity during that game. We find that surprise plays an important role: the fans of the top teams are more active when their teams lose and so are the fans of the bottom teams in an unexpected win. Second, we study fan behavior over consecutive seasons and show that strong team performance is associated with fans of low loyalty, likely due to "bandwagon fans." Fans of the bottom teams tend to discuss their team's future such as young talents in the roster, which may help them stay optimistic during adversity. Our results not only contribute to understanding the interplay between online sports communities and offline context but also provide significant insights into sports management.
Since user behavior in these online fan communities is inherently connected to game events and team performance, we construct a unique dataset that combines 1.5M posts and 43M comments in NBA-related communities on Reddit with statistics that document team performance in the NBA. We analyze the impact of team performance on fan behavior both at the game level and the season level. First, we study how team performance in a game relates to user activity during that game. We find that surprise plays an important role: the fans of the top teams are more active when their teams lose and so are the fans of the bottom teams in an unexpected win. Second, we study fan behavior over consecutive seasons and show that strong team performance is associated with fans of low loyalty, likely due to "bandwagon fans." Fans of the bottom teams tend to discuss their team's future such as young talents in the roster, which may help them stay optimistic during adversity. Our results not only contribute to understanding the interplay between online sports communities and offline context but also provide significant insights into sports management.
Topics
No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →
References
75
[1]
Dan Ariely. 2008. Predictably irrational. HarperCollins New York.
[2]
National Basketball Association. 2017. NBA Official Rules 2017--18. New York, NY, USA. https://turnernbahangtime.files.wordpress.com/2017/10/2017--18-nba-rule-book.pdf
[6]
Richard M Campbell Jr, Damon Aiken, and Aubrey Kent. 2004. Beyond BIRGing and CORFing: Continuing the Exploration of Fan Behavior. Sport Marketing Quarterly 13, 3 (2004).
[7]
[10]
Jeff Desjardins and Visual Capitalist. 2017. The world's 50 most valuable sports teams. http://www.businessinsider.com/the-worlds-50-most-valuable-sports-teams-2017--8. (2017). {Online; accessed 15-April-2018}.
[11]
Peter Dolton and George MacKerron. 2018. Is football a matter of life and death--or is it more Important than that? (2018).
[13]
[14]
Bleacher Report Adam Fromal. 2017. Ranking Every NBA Franchise on Historical Success. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2733544-ranking-every-nba-franchise-on-historical-success. (2017). {Online; accessed 15-April-2018}.
[15]
[16]
Devin Gaffney and J Nathan Matias. 2018. Caveat Emptor, Computational Social Science: Large-Scale Missing Data in a Widely-Published Reddit Corpus. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.05046 (2018).
[17]
Eric Goldschein. 2015. It's Time to Give /r/nba the Respect it Deserves. https://www.sportsgrid.com/as-seen-on-tv/media/its-time-to-give-rnba-the-respect-it-deserves/. (2015). {Online; accessed 15-April-2018}.
[18]
The Stanford Natural Language Processing Group. 2010. Stanford Topic Modeling Toolbox. https://nlp.stanford.edu/software/tmt/tmt-0.4/. (2010). {Online; accessed 15-April-2018}.
[19]
William L Hamilton, Justine Zhang, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Dan Jurafsky, and Jure Leskovec. 2017. Loyalty in Online Communities. In Proceedings of ICWSM, Vol. 2017. AAAI, 377--386.
[29]
[32]
[33]
Zhiyuan Lin, Niloufar Salehi, Bowen Yao, Yiqi Chen, and Michael S Bernstein. 2017. Better When It Was Smaller? Community Content and Behavior After Massive Growth.. In Proceedings of ICWSM. 132--141.
[36]
Edward Newell, David Jurgens, Haji Mohammad Saleem, Hardik Vala, Jad Sassine, Caitrin Armstrong, and Derek Ruths. 2016. User Migration in Online Social Networks: A Case Study on Reddit During a Period of Community Unrest. In Proceedings of ICWSM. ACM, 279--288.
[37]
Leysia Palen and Kenneth M Anderson. 2016. Crisis informatics: New data for extraordinary times. Science 353, 6296 (2016), 224--225.
[39]
Max Rappaport. 2018. The Definitive History of -Trust the Process'. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2729018-the-definitive-history-of-trust-the-process. (2018). {Online; accessed 15-April-2018}.
[40]
Redditlist. 2018. Most Active Subreddits. http://redditlist.com/all. (2018). {Online; accessed 15-April-2018}.
[42]
Alan Roadburg. 1980. Factors precipitating fan violence: A comparison of professional soccer in Britain and North America. British Journal of Sociology (1980), 265--276.
[44]
Matthew Rothstein. 2017. For Aging Veterans, One Last Shot At An NBA Title Is All They Can Think About. https://uproxx.com/dimemag/ring-chasing-richard-jefferson-shane-battier/. (2017). {Online; accessed 15-April-2018}.
[45]
Haji Mohammad Saleem, Kelly P Dillon, Susan Benesch, and Derek Ruths. 2017. A Web of Hate: Tackling Hateful Speech in Online Social Spaces. In First Workshop on Text Analytics for Cybersecurity and Online Safety (TA-COS 2016).
[46]
Matthew D Shank and Mark R Lyberger. 2014. Sports marketing: A strategic perspective. Routledge.
[47]
Nate Silver and Reuben Fischer-Baum. 2018. How We Calculate NBA Elo Ratings. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-we-calculate-nba-elo-ratings/. (2018). {Online; accessed 15-April-2018}.
[50]
Statista. 2018. Average TV viewership of NBA Finals games in the United States from 2002 to 2017 (in millions). https://www.statista.com/statistics/240377/nba-finals-tv-viewership-in-the-united-states/. (2018). {Online; accessed 15-April-2018}.
Showing 50 of 75 references
Metrics
13
Citations
75
References
Details
- Published
- Nov 01, 2018
- Vol/Issue
- 2(CSCW)
- Pages
- 1-25
- License
- View
Authors
Funding
National Science Foundation
Award: CNS 1528138
Cite This Article
Jason Shuo Zhang, Chenhao Tan, Qin Lv (2018). "This is why we play". Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274466
Related
You May Also Like
Reliability and Inter-rater Reliability in Qualitative Research
Nora McDonald, Sarita Schoenebeck · 2019
889 citations
Deconstructing Community-Based Collaborative Design
Christina Harrington, Sheena Erete · 2019
470 citations
"Hello AI": Uncovering the Onboarding Needs of Medical Practitioners for Human-AI Collaborative Decision-Making
Carrie J. Cai, Samantha Winter · 2019
424 citations