Constructing Authenticity on TikTok: Social Norms and Social Support on the "Fun" Platform

Kristen Barta; Nazanin Andalibi

doi:10.1145/3479574

journal article Oct 13, 2021

Constructing Authenticity on TikTok: Social Norms and Social Support on the "Fun" Platform

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Vol. 5 No. CSCW2 pp. 1-29 · Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

View at Publisher Save 10.1145/3479574

Abstract

Authenticity, generally regarded as coherence between one's inner self and outward behavior, is associated with myriad social values (e.g., integrity) and beneficial outcomes, such as psychological well-being. Scholarship suggests, however, that behaving authentically online is complicated by self-presentation norms that make it difficult to present a complex self as well as encourage sharing positive emotions and facets of self and discourage sharing difficult emotions. In this paper, we position authenticity as a self-presentation norm and identify the sociomaterial factors that contribute to the learning, enactment, and enforcement of authenticity on the short-video sharing platform TikTok. We draw on interviews with 15 U.S. TikTok users to argue that normative authenticity and understanding of TikTok as a "fun" platform are mutually constitutive in supporting a "just be you" attitude on TikTok that in turn normalizes expressions of both positive and difficult emotions and experiences. We consider the social context of TikTok and use an affordance lens to identify anonymity, of oneself and one's audience; association between content and the "For You" landing page; and video modality of TikTok as factors informing authenticity as a self-presentation norm. We argue that these factors similarly contribute to TikTok's viability as a space for social support exchange and address the utility of the comments section as a site for both supportive communication and norm judgment and enforcement. We conclude by considering the limitations of authenticity as social norm and present implications for designing online spaces for social support and connection.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

90

[1]

10.1145/3386600

[2]

10.1145/3173574.3173732

[3]

10.1145/3241044

[4]

Sensemaking and Coping After Pregnancy Loss

Nazanin Andalibi, Patricia Garcia

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interacti... 10.1145/3449201

[5]

10.1145/3234942

[6]

10.1111/j.1468--2885.1998.tb00226.x

[7]

10.1080/1369118x.2018.1437204

[8]

Godfrey T. Barrett-Lennard. 1998. Carl Rogers' Helping System: Journey and Substance. Sage, London, UK.

[9]

Kristen Barta. 2019. Reclaiming Publicness in the Face of Sexual Assault: Social Media Disclosure and Visibility (Communication). PhD Dissertation. University of Washington Seattle WA.

[10]

10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050944

[11]

10.1145/2675133.2675297

[12]

Elena Botella. 4 Dec 2019. TikTok admits it suppressed videos by disabled queer and fat creators. Slate. Retrieved from https://slate.com/technology/2019/12/tiktok-disabled-users-videos-suppressed.html

[13]

10.1145/1518701.1518847

[14]

Brant. R. Burleson and Erina L. MacGeorge. 2002. Supportive communication. In Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, 3rd ed., Mark L. Knapp and John A. Daly, Eds. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 374--424.

[15]

Social Media: Defining, Developing, and Divining

Caleb T. Carr, Rebecca A. Hayes

Atlantic Journal of Communication 10.1080/15456870.2015.972282

[16]

10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.087

[17]

Robert B. Cialdini and Melanie R. Trost. 1998. Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In The Handbook of Social Psychology, Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske, and Gardner Lindzey (Eds.). McGraw Hill, Boston, MA, 151--192.

[18]

10.1177/0270467617714944

[19]

10.1145/3290607.3313033

[20]

10.1177/2056305116670673

[21]

Nicole B. Ellison and danah m. boyd. (2013). Sociality through social network sites. In The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 151--172.

[22]

Explicating Affordances: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Affordances in Communication Research

Sandra K. Evans, Katy E. Pearce, Jessica Vitak et al.

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10.1111/jcc4.12180

[23]

A Theory of Social Comparison Processes

Leon Festinger

Human Relations 10.1177/001872675400700202

[24]

10.1177/0956797611429709

[25]

10.1080/03637751.2017.1332418

[26]

10.5210/fm.v20i1.4985

[27]

10.1108/13632541011064526

[28]

Barney G. Glaser and Ansel L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, Chicago, IL.

[29]

Daena J. Goldsmith. 2004. Communicating Social Support. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

[30]

The Strength of Weak Ties

Mark S. Granovetter

American Journal of Sociology 10.1086/225469

[31]

10.1080/1369118x.2011.642401

[32]

10.5210/fm.v18i4.4269

[33]

10.5210/fm.v21i6.6791

[34]

10.1080/15295039309366848

[35]

10.1080/08838151.2015.1127248

[36]

Natalie Ann Hendry. 2020. Young women's mental illness and (in-)visible social media practices of control and emotional recognition. Social Media + Society 6 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120963832 10.1177/2056305120963832

[37]

10.1111/jcc4.12008

[38]

10.1177/13675494030063008

[39]

How TikTok recommends videos #ForYou. 18 June 2020. TikTok. Retrieved from https://newsroom.tiktok.com/en-us/how-tiktok-recommends-videos-for-you

[40]

Harry M. Johnson. 1960. Sociology: A Systematic Introduction. Harcourt, Brace and World, New York, NY.

[41]

10.1037/gpr0000157

[42]

10.1177/1367549417722092

[43]

10.1145/3476046

[44]

10.1177/1367549420945341

[45]

10.1016/s0065-2601(06)38006-9

[46]

Robert E. Kraut and Paul Resnick. 2011. Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-based Social Design. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

[47]

10.1080/1556035x.2015.1066725

[48]

Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye-contact on toxic online disinhibition

Noam Lapidot-Lefler, Azy Barak

Computers in Human Behavior 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.014

[49]

Mark R. Leary. 1996. Self-presentation: Impression Management and Interpersonal Behavior. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

[50]

Mark R. Leary and June Price Tangney. 2003. The self as an organizing construct in the behavioral and social sciences. In Handbook of Self and Identity, Mark R. Leary and June Price Tangney (Eds.). Guilford Press, New York, NY, 3--14.

Showing 50 of 90 references

Cited By

112

Keep it perfect or keep it real? The influence of descriptive norms on adolescents’ expression of multiple selves in Instagram Stories

Arne Freya Zillich, Annika Wunderlich · 2026

Computers in Human Behavior

You Can (Not) Say What You Want: Using Algospeak to Contest and Evade Algorithmic Content Moderation on TikTok

Ella Steen, Kathryn Yurechko · 2023

Social Media + Society

Metrics

112

Citations

90

References

Details

Published: Oct 13, 2021
Vol/Issue: 5(CSCW2)
Pages: 1-29
License: View

Authors

K

Kristen Barta

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

N

Nazanin Andalibi

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Cite This Article

Kristen Barta, Nazanin Andalibi (2021). Constructing Authenticity on TikTok: Social Norms and Social Support on the "Fun" Platform. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479574

Constructing Authenticity on TikTok: Social Norms and Social Support on the "Fun" Platform

You May Also Like