journal article Sep 15, 2023

A Comprehensive Survey on Collaborative Data-access Enablers in the IIoT

Abstract
The scope of the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) has stretched beyond manufacturing to include energy, healthcare, transportation, and all that tomorrow’s smart cities will entail. The realm of IIoT includes smart sensors, actuators, programmable logic controllers, distributed control systems (DCS), embedded devices, supervisory control, and data acquisition systems—all produced by manufacturers for different purposes and with different data structures and formats; designed according to different standards and made to follow different protocols. In this sea of incompatibility, how can we flexibly acquire these heterogeneous data, and how can we uniformly structure them to suit thousands of different applications? In this article, we survey the four pillars of information science that enable collaborative data access in an IIoT—standardization, data acquisition, data fusion, and scalable architecture—to provide an up-to-date audit of current research in the field. Here, standardization in IIoT relies on standards and technologies to make things communicative; data acquisition attempts to transparently collect data through plug-and-play architectures, reconfigurable schemes, or hardware expansion; data fusion refers to the techniques and strategies for overcoming heterogeneity in data formats and sources; and scalable architecture provides basic techniques to support heterogeneous requirements. The article also concludes with an overview of the frontier researches and emerging technologies for supporting or challenging data access from the aspects of 5G, machine learning, blockchain, and semantic web.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
270
[1]
ISO T. C. 184. 2022. Automation systems and integration. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/committee/54110.html
[2]
3GPP TR 22.804. 2020. Study on Communication for Automation in Vertical domains. Retrieved from https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/SpecificationDetails.aspx?specificationId=3187
[3]
3GPP TR 22.821. 2018. Feasibility Study on LAN Support in 5G. Retrieved from https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/SpecificationDetails.aspx?specificationId=3281
[4]
5G ACIA. 2019. 5G for Connected Industries and Automation. Retrieved from https://5g-acia.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/WP_5G_for_Connected_Industries_and_Automation_Download_19.03.19.pdf
[5]
ABB. 2022. Introducing ABB Ability. Retrieved from https://global.abb/topic/ability/en/about
[7]
Tolulope Adesina and Oladiipo Osasona. 2019. A novel cognitive IoT gateway framework: Towards a holistic approach to IoT interoperability. In IEEE 5th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT’19). IEEE, 53–58.
[9]
Khaled Al-Gumaei, Kornelia Schuba, Andrej Friesen, Sascha Heymann, Carsten Pieper, Florian Pethig, and Sebastian Schriegel. 2018. A survey of internet of things and big data integrated solutions for industrie 4.0. In A Survey of Internet of Things and Big Data Integrated Solutions for Industrie 4.0, Vol. 1. IEEE, 1417–1424.
[13]
Amazon. 2023. AWS IoT overview. Retrieved from https://aws.amazon.com/iot/?nc1=h_ls
[14]
Babu S. Anish, Hareesh M. J., John Paul Martin, Sijo Cherian, and Yedhu Sastri. 2014. System performance evaluation of para virtualization, container virtualization, and full virtualization using Xen, OpenVZ, and XenServer. In 4th International Conference on Advances in Computing and Communications. 247–250.
[19]
Roger Baig, Roger Pueyo Centelles, Felix Freitag, and Leandro Navarro. 2017. On edge microclouds to provide local container-based services. In Global Information Infrastructure and Networking Symposium (GIIS’17). 31–36.
[20]
Balena. Balena. Retrieved from https://www.balena.io/
[25]
Flavio Bonomi, Rodolfo Milito, Jiang Zhu, and Sateesh Addepalli. 2012. Fog computing and its role in the internet of things. In 1st Edition of the MCC Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing. 13–16. 10.1145/2342509.2342513
[27]
Mike Botts, George Percivall, Carl Reed, and John Davidson. 2006. OGC® sensor web enablement: Overview and high level architecture. In 2nd International Conference on GeoSensor Networks. Springer, 175–190.
[34]
Wo L. Chang David Boyd and Orit Levin. 2019. NIST Big Data Interoperability Framework: Volume 6 Reference Architecture. (October 2019).
[41]
Avarachan Cherian, Darold Wobschall, and Mehrdad Sheikholeslami. 2017. An IoT interface for industrial analog sensor with IEEE 21451 protocol. In IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS’17). IEEE, 1–5.
[44]
Industrial Internet Consortium.2022. Industrial internet reference architecture. Retrieved from https://www.iiconsortium.org/IIRA/

Showing 50 of 270 references

Metrics
35
Citations
270
References
Details
Published
Sep 15, 2023
Vol/Issue
56(2)
Pages
1-37
License
View
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China Award: U21A20484
National Key R&D Program of China Award: 2022YFB3304600
Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province Award: 2022C01016
Cite This Article
Danfeng Sun, Junjie Hu, Huifeng Wu, et al. (2023). A Comprehensive Survey on Collaborative Data-access Enablers in the IIoT. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(2), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3612918
Related

You May Also Like

Data clustering

A. K. Jain, M. N. Murty · 1999

9,568 citations

Anomaly detection

Varun Chandola, Arindam Banerjee · 2009

8,799 citations

Machine learning in automated text categorization

Fabrizio Sebastiani · 2002

5,027 citations

Object tracking

Alper Yilmaz, Omar Javed · 2006

3,632 citations

A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning

Ninareh Mehrabi, Fred Morstatter · 2021

3,466 citations