journal article Open Access Jan 01, 2019

Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion

International Security Vol. 44 No. 1 pp. 42-79 · JSTOR
View at Publisher Save 10.1162/isec_a_00351
Abstract
Abstract
Liberals claim that globalization has led to fragmentation and decentralized networks of power relations. This does not explain how states increasingly “weaponize interdependence” by leveraging global networks of informational and financial exchange for strategic advantage. The theoretical literature on network topography shows how standard models predict that many networks grow asymmetrically so that some nodes are far more connected than others. This model nicely describes several key global economic networks, centering on the United States and a few other states. Highly asymmetric networks allow states with (1) effective jurisdiction over the central economic nodes and (2) appropriate domestic institutions and norms to weaponize these structural advantages for coercive ends. In particular, two mechanisms can be identified. First, states can employ the “panopticon effect” to gather strategically valuable information. Second, they can employ the “chokepoint effect” to deny network access to adversaries. Tests of the plausibility of these arguments across two extended case studies that provide variation both in the extent of U.S. jurisdiction and in the presence of domestic institutions—the SWIFT financial messaging system and the internet—confirm the framework's expectations. A better understanding of the policy implications of the use and potential overuse of these tools, as well as the response strategies of targeted states, will recast scholarly debates on the relationship between economic globalization and state coercion.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
88
[14]
Kittrie Orde F. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law (2009)
[17]
Farrell Henry Journal of Cybersecurity (2017)
[19]
Judge Kathryn University of Chicago Law Review (2015)
[20]
Raustiala Kal Virginia Journal of International Law (2002)
[21]
Slaughter Anne-Marie Michigan Journal of International Law (2003)
[23]
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks

Albert-László Barabási, Réka Albert

Science 10.1126/science.286.5439.509
[24]
Newman M.E.J. Physical Review E (2003)
[25]
Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data

Aaron Clauset, Cosma Rohilla Shalizi, M. E. J. Newman

SIAM Review 10.1137/070710111
[28]
Ting-Fang Cheng Nikki Asian Review (2018)
[34]
Oatley Thomas European Journal of International Relations, forthcoming, doi.org/10.
[38]
Journal of Conflict Resolution (2007) 10.1177/0022002706296157
[43]
David Paul A. American Economic Review (1985)
[48]
Fagiolo Giorgio Physical Review E (2009)

Showing 50 of 88 references

Cited By
895
Les liens et déconnexions de la politique commerciale

Louise Dalingwater, Richard Ouellet · 2026

Interventions économiques
A Framework for Geoeconomics

Christopher Clayton, Matteo Maggiori · 2026

Econometrica
Geopolitics
The Global Factory Revisited

Peter J. Buckley, Peter Enderwick · 2025

Management International Review
Journal of European Integration
JCMS: Journal of Common Market Stud...
Theorizing Infrastructures in Global Politics

Christian Bueger, Tobias Liebetrau · 2023

International Studies Quarterly
Global Studies Quarterly
Annual Review of Political Science
European Integration and the New Global Disorder*

Scott Lavery, Davide Schmid · 2021

JCMS: Journal of Common Market Stud...
Metrics
895
Citations
88
References
Details
Published
Jan 01, 2019
Vol/Issue
44(1)
Pages
42-79
License
View
Cite This Article
Henry Farrell, Abraham L. Newman (2019). Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42-79. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351
Related

You May Also Like

The False Promise of International Institutions

John J. Mearsheimer · 1994

1,443 citations

Why Economic Sanctions Do Not Work

Robert A. Pape · 1997

605 citations