Truth, Deliberative Democracy, and the Virtues of Accuracy: Is Fake News Destroying the Public Sphere?

Simone Chambers

doi:10.1177/0032321719890811

journal article Apr 02, 2020

Truth, Deliberative Democracy, and the Virtues of Accuracy: Is Fake News Destroying the Public Sphere?

Simone Chambers

Political Studies Vol. 69 No. 1 pp. 147-163 · SAGE Publications

View at Publisher Save 10.1177/0032321719890811

Abstract

Do fake news and what some have labeled our post-truth predicament represent a new and deadly challenge to the epistemic presuppositions of the public sphere? While many commentators have invoked Hannah Arendt to help answer this question, I argue that Arendt is the wrong place to look. Instead, I suggest that, on one hand, deliberative democracy and Jürgen Habermas’ idea of democracy as truth-tracking offer a more helpful framework for assessing and combating the threat of fake news and, on the other hand, Bernard Williams’ virtues of accuracy identify the citizen virtues necessary to counteract fake news. The virtues of accuracy, I contend, can be facilitated and encouraged through structural and regulatory features in the public sphere. We are indeed seeing a recalibration and significant push back on fake news due to both structural changes and ordinary citizens becoming more epistemically responsible consumers of digital information.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

52

[1]

10.1515/9781400882731

[2]

Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election

Hunt Allcott, Matthew Gentzkow

Journal of Economic Perspectives 10.1257/jep.31.2.211

[3]

Arendt H (1954)

[4]

Bächtiger A (2018)

[5]

10.1177/0191453707084277

[6]

10.2307/j.ctvc77mcz

[7]

Balancing epistemic quality and equal participation in a system approach to deliberative democracy

Simone Chambers

Social Epistemology 10.1080/02691728.2017.1317867

[8]

10.1007/978-3-319-95534-6

[9]

10.1177/0090591716659114

[10]

The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation

John S. Dryzek, André Bächtiger, Simone Chambers et al.

Science 10.1126/science.aaw2694

[11]

10.1093/oso/9780198820291.001.0001

[12]

10.1080/10584600701807836

[13]

Assessing the Electoral Impact of the 2010 Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review

John Gastil, Katherine R. Knobloch, Justin Reedy et al.

American Politics Research 10.1177/1532673x17715620

[14]

Graves L, Cherubini F (2016) The Rise of Fact-Checking Sites in Europe. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Available at: http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/publication/rise-fact-checking-sites-europe (accessed 2 December 2019).

[15]

Guess A, Lyons B, Montgomery JM, et al. (2018a) Fake News, Facebook Ads, and Misconceptions: Assessing Information Quality in the 2018 U.S. Midterm Election Campaign. Available at: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~bnyhan/fake-news-2018.pdf (accessed 2 December 2019).

[16]

Guess A, Lyons B, Nyhan B, et al. (2018b) Avoiding the Echo Chamber About Echo Chambers. Medium, 13 February. Available at: https://medium.com/trust-media-and-democracy/avoiding-the-echo-chamber-about-echo-chambers-6e1f1a1a0f39 (accessed 2 December 2019).

[17]

10.1126/sciadv.aau4586

[18]

Habermas J (2005)

[19]

Habermas J (2009)

[20]

10.1093/oso/9780190883041.001.0001

[21]

10.1177/2336825x1802600303

[22]

Affect, Not Ideology

Shanto Iyengar, Gaurav Sood, Yphtach Lelkes

Public Opinion Quarterly 10.1093/poq/nfs038

[23]

Jamieson KH (2018)

[24]

Kahneman D (2013)

[25]

Khazan O (2017) Why Fake News Targeted Trump Supporters. The Atlantic, 2 February. Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/02/why-fake-news-targeted-trump-supporters/515433/ (accessed 2 December 2019).

[26]

10.1080/02691728.2017.1317868

[27]

The science of fake news

David M. J. Lazer, Matthew A. Baum, Yochai Benkler et al.

Science 10.1126/science.aao2998

[28]

10.1017/cbo9781139032490

[29]

10.7551/mitpress/11483.001.0001

[30]

10.1017/cbo9781139178914.002

[31]

10.1093/poq/nfw001

[32]

Matsa K, Shearer E (2018) News Use across Social Media Platforms 2018. Pew Research Center, 10 September. Available at: http://www.journalism.org/2018/09/10/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2018/ (accessed 2 December 2019).

[33]

Meyer B (2018) The Grim Conclusions of the Largest-Ever Study of Fake News. The Atlantic, 8 March. Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/03/largest-study-ever-fake-news-mit-twitter/555104/ (accessed 2 December 2019).

[34]

Mitchell A, Gottfried J, Walker M, et al. (2019) Many Americans Say Made-Up News Is a Critical Problem That Needs to Be Fixed. Pew Research Center, 5 June. Available at: https://www.journalism.org/2019/06/05/many-americans-say-made-up-news-is-a-critical-problem-that-needs-to-be-fixed/ (accessed 2 December 2019).

[35]

Mitchell A, Holcomb J, Barthel M (2016) Many Americans Believe That Fake News Is Sowing Confusion. Pew Research Center, 15 December. Available at: http://www.journalism.org/2016/12/15/many-americans-believe-fake-news-is-sowing-confusion/ (accessed 2 December 2019).

[36]

Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning

Gordon Pennycook, David G. Rand

Cognition 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011

[37]

Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality

Gordon Pennycook, David G. Rand

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 10.1073/pnas.1806781116

[38]

10.1353/jod.2017.0025

[39]

Piraro D (2017) Fake-News. Bizarro Blog, 17 March. Available at: https://www.bizarro.com/blog/2018/09/16/distracted-dining?rq=hurricane (accessed 2 December 2019)/

[40]

Resnick B (2018) 9 Essential Lessons from Psychology to Understand the Trump Era. Vox. Available at: https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/4/11/16897062/political-psychology-trump-explain-studies-research-science-motivated-reasoning-bias-fake-news (accessed 2 December 2019).

[41]

Roff H (2017) Trump and Truth: Or What Arendt Can Teach Us about Truth and Politics. Duck of Minerva, 14 February. Available at: https://duckofminerva.com/2017/02/trump-and-truth-or-what-arendt-can-teach-us-about-truth-and-politics.html (accessed 2 December 2019).

[42]

Rosenfeld S (2019)

[43]

Sleat M (2018) (Post)-Truth and Politics. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/38499131/_Post-_Truth_and_Politics (accessed 2 December 2019).

[44]

Stonebridge L (2019) Why Hannah Arendt Is the Philosopher for Now. The New Statesman, 20 March. Available at: https://www.newstatesman.com/culture/books/2019/03/hannah-arendt-resurgence-philosophy-relevance

[45]

Swift A (2016) Americans Trust in Mass Media Sinks to a New Low. Gallup, 14 September. Available at: https://news.gallup.com/poll/195542/americans-trust-mass-media-sinks-new-low.aspx (accessed 2 December 2019).

[46]

The Economist (2018) The Partisan Brain: Why Psychology Experiments Tell You Why People Deny Facts. The Economist, 8 December. Available at: https://www.economist.com/united-states/2018/12/08/what-psychology-experiments-tell-you-about-why-people-deny-facts (accessed 2 December 2019).

[47]

The spread of true and false news online

Soroush Vosoughi, Deb Roy, Sinan Aral

Science 10.1126/science.aap9559

[48]

Warble C, Derakhshen H (2017) Information Disorder: Toward an Interpretative Framework for Research and Policy Making. European Council Report. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-researc/168076277c (accessed 2 December 2019).

[49]

Weyn T (2017) An Arendtian Approach to Post-truth Politics. openDemocracy, 11 March. Available at: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/can-europe-make-it/arendtian-approach-to-post-truth-politics/ (accessed 2 December 2019).

[50]

Williams B (2002)

Showing 50 of 52 references

Cited By

129

The Content Homogenization of Fact-Checking Through Platform Partnerships: A Comparison Between Eight Countries

Regina Cazzamatta · 2024

Journalism & Mass Communication...

Metrics

129

Citations

52

References

Details

Published: Apr 02, 2020
Vol/Issue: 69(1)
Pages: 147-163
License: View

Authors

S

Simone Chambers

Department of Political Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA

Cite This Article

Simone Chambers (2020). Truth, Deliberative Democracy, and the Virtues of Accuracy: Is Fake News Destroying the Public Sphere?. Political Studies, 69(1), 147-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719890811

Truth, Deliberative Democracy, and the Virtues of Accuracy: Is Fake News Destroying the Public Sphere?

You May Also Like