Abstract
Objectives(1) To describe and review a single center’s pediatric endoscopic cholesteatoma experience, including surgical and audiologic outcomes. (2) To assess the most common locations of residual cholesteatoma following endoscopic removal.Study DesignCase series with chart review.SettingTertiary otologic referral center.SubjectsPatients <19 years of age who underwent cholesteatoma removal with either endoscopic or microscopic visualization.MethodsIn a comparison of patients who underwent total endoscopic ear surgery (TEES), combined endoscopic‐microscopic surgery, or microscopic surgery, analyzed outcomes included locations and incidence of recurrent and residual cholesteatoma, complications, and audiometric testing.ResultsSixty‐six patients (mean age, 10.9 years; range, 4‐18 years; 43.4% female) with 76 ears met inclusion criteria. The average overall follow‐up was 18.8 months (range, 6.7‐48.3). Forty‐seven (61.8%) ears underwent microscopic removal of cholesteatoma; 29 (38.1%) ears underwent combined endoscopic‐microscopic removal; and 8 (10.5%) ears underwent TEES removal. Significantly more mastoidectomies were completed in microscopic cases as compared with endoscopic cases (P =. 049). Though second‐look procedures occurred in 15 (51.7%) endoscopic cases and 10 (21.3%) microscopic cases (P =. 006), the rate of residual disease was 20.0% and 40.0% in endoscopic and microscopic cases, respectively (P =. 38). When controlling for preoperative hearing, only the air‐bone gap for TEES demonstrated significant improvement (P =. 009). No complications were noted.ConclusionThe present report describes our experience with pediatric endoscopic cholesteatoma surgery, demonstrating similar hearing outcomes, rates of recurrence and residual disease, and complication rates as compared with traditional microscopic techniques.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
29
[5]
Tarabichi M "Endoscopic management of acquired cholesteatoma" Am J Otol (1997)
[7]
Sade J "Results of mastoid operations in various chronic ear diseases" Am J Otol (1981)
[10]
Systematic review of outcomes following observational and operative endoscopic middle ear surgery

Elliott D. Kozin, Shawn Gulati, Alyson B. Kaplan et al.

The Laryngoscope 10.1002/lary.25048
[20]
Bottrill ID "Endoscope‐assisted ear surgery" Am J Otol (1995)
[21]
Thomassin JM "Residual cholesteatoma: its prevention by surgery with endoscopic guidance [in French]" Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) (1991)
[22]
Presutti L "Endoscopic management of acquired cholesteatoma: our experience" J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2008)
[24]
Gristwood RE (1982)
Cited By
63
Endoscopic Management of Pediatric Cholesteatoma

Peter J. Ryan, Nirmal P. Patel · 2020

Journal of Otology
Metrics
63
Citations
29
References
Details
Published
Mar 01, 2016
Vol/Issue
154(6)
Pages
1121-1127
License
View
Funding
National Institutes of Health Award: UL1 TR000445
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Cite This Article
Jacob B. Hunter, M. Geraldine Zuniga, Alex D. Sweeney, et al. (2016). Pediatric Endoscopic Cholesteatoma Surgery. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 154(6), 1121-1127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599816631941
Related

You May Also Like

Facial Nerve Grading System

John W. House, Derald E. Brackmann · 1985

2,950 citations

Development and Validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale1

Michael G. Stewart, David L. Witsell · 2004

966 citations

Hearing Loss, Loneliness, and Social Isolation: A Systematic Review

Aishwarya Shukla, Michael Harper · 2020

589 citations

Clinical Practice Guideline: Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (Update)

Neil Bhattacharyya, Samuel P. Gubbels · 2017

455 citations