BishtRef
Articles Journals Publishers Authors Subjects Most Cited New Papers Year Stats Open Access
journal article Oct 03, 2022

An evaluation of intervention research for transition-age autistic youth

Kristen Bottema-Beutel ORCID Shannon Crowley LaPoint So Yoon Kim ORCID Sarah Mohiuddin Qun Yu ORCID Rachael McKinnon
Autism Vol. 27 No. 4 pp. 890-904 · SAGE Publications
View at Publisher Save 10.1177/13623613221128761
Abstract
In this systematic evaluation of intervention research for transition-age autistic youth, we examined quality indicators in 193 group and single-case design intervention studies, which tested effects on 1258 outcomes. Behaviorally based interventions were the most common intervention type. We found significant threats to internal validity for the majority of studies, including inadequate randomization, unmasked assessors, and too few data points to infer functional relations. The majority of outcomes were measured in contexts similar to the intervention and were conceptualized as behaviors directly addressed by intervention procedures. As such, they are of unclear long-term utility for autistic people entering adulthood. Adverse events were rarely reported. We suggest several avenues for improving intervention research for this age group.

Lay abstract
In this study, we assess the quality of intervention research that focuses on autistic youth who are 14–22 years old. We found 193 different studies on this topic, and carefully reviewed them. Most of these studies tested strategies that were behavioral. This means that they used procedures like prompting and rewards to change participants’ behavior. We found that the majority of studies had problems that make it hard to determine whether or not the intervention worked. The problems related to how researchers designed their studies, and how they measured the study outcomes. We also found that researchers rarely tried to find out if the strategies they studied had unintended negative effects for participants. Because of these issues, we make suggestions for how researchers might design better studies that will let people know how well the strategies worked.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
47
[2]
Baer D. Wolf M. Risley T. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91
[3]
Biggs E. E. Robison S. E. (2022). Review of the evidence base for peer network interventions for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325221075013 10.1177/07419325221075013
[5]
Bottema-Beutel K. Crowley S. Sandbank M. Woynaroski T. G. (2021a). Adverse event reporting in intervention research for young autistic children. Autism 25(2) 322–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361320965331 10.1177/1362361320965331
[9]
Boutron I. Page M. J. Higgins J. P. T. Altman D. G. Lundh A. Hróbjartsson A. (2022). Chapter 7: Considering bias and conflicts of interest among the included studies. In Higgins J. P. T. Thomas J. Cumpston M. Li T. Page M. J. Welch V. A. (Eds.) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 6.3). https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-07
[12]
Cihak D. F. Schrader L. (2008). Does the model matter? Comparing video self-modeling and video adult modeling for task acquisition and maintenance by adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Special Education Technology 23(3) 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340802300302 10.1177/016264340802300302
[14]
Croen L. A. Zerbo O. Qian Y. Massolo M. L. Rich S. Sidney S. Kripke C. (2015). The health status of adults on the autism spectrum. Autism 19(7) 814–823. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361315577517 10.1177/1362361315577517
[15]
Davis K. S. Kennedy S. A. Dallavecchia A. Skolasky R. L. Gordon B. (2019). Psychoeducational interventions for adults with level 3 autism spectrum disorder: A 50-year systematic review. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology 32(3) 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1097/wnn.0000000000000201 10.1097/wnn.0000000000000201
[16]
When autism researchers disregard harms: A commentary

Michelle Dawson, Sue Fletcher-Watson

Autism 10.1177/13623613211031403
[20]
Higgins J. P. T. Thomas J. Chandler J. Cumpston M. Li T. Page M. J. Welch V. A. (Eds.). (2021). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 6.2). Cochrane. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook
[22]
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 Public Law No. 108-446 20 U. S. C. 1400 H. R. 1350.
[24]
Kennedy C. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Pearson.
[30]
Newman L., Wagner M., Knokey A.-M., Marder C., Nagle K., Shaver D., Wei X., . . .Schwarting M. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2011-3005). SRI International.
[31]
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie, Patrick M Bossuyt et al.

BMJ 10.1136/bmj.n71
[32]
What should autism research focus upon? Community views and priorities from the United Kingdom

Elizabeth Pellicano, Adam Dinsmore, Tony Charman

Autism 10.1177/1362361314529627
[34]
Reichow B. Barton E. E. Maggin D. M. (2018). Development and applications of the single-case design risk of bias tool for evaluating single-case design research study reports. Research in Developmental Disabilities 79 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.05.008 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.05.008
[35]
Reichow B. Barton E. E. Sewell J. N. Good L. Wolery M. (2010). Effects of weighted vests on the engagement of children with developmental delays and autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 25(1) 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357609353751 10.1177/1088357609353751
[36]
Project AIM: Autism intervention meta-analysis for studies of young children.

Micheal Sandbank, Kristen Bottema-Beutel, Shannon Crowley et al.

Psychological Bulletin 10.1037/bul0000215
[37]
Sandbank M. Bottema-Beutel K. Woynaroski T. (2021). Intervention recommendations for children with autism in light of a changing evidence base. JAMA Pediatrics 175(4) 341–342. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.4730 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.4730
[39]
Sandoval-Norton A. H. Shkedy G. (2019). How much compliance is too much compliance: Is long-term ABA therapy abuse? Cogent Psychology 6(1) 1641258. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2019.1641258 10.1080/23311908.2019.1641258
[40]
Schreibman L. Dawson G. Stahmer A. C. Landa R. Rogers S. J. McGee G. G. . . .Halladay A. (2015). Naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions: Empirically validated treatments for autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 45(8) 2411–2428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2407-8 10.1007/s10803-015-2407-8
[41]
Sosnowy C. Silverman C. Shattuck P. (2018). Parents’ and young adults’ perspectives on transition outcomes for young adults with autism. Autism 22(1) 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361317699585 10.1177/1362361317699585
[43]
Wallace B., Small K., Brodley C. E., Lau J., Trikalinos T. A. (2012). Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center: Abstrackr. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium (pp. 819–824). New York, NY: ACM.
[44]
Watson J. B., Kimble G. A. (1998). Behaviorism (1st ed.). Routledge.
[46]
What Works Clearinghouse. (n.d.). What Works Clearinghouse procedures and standards handbook (Version 4.0). U.S. Department of Education Institute of Education Science. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/referenceresources/wwc_standards_handbook_v4.pdf
[47]
Yoder P. J. Bottema-Beutel K. Woynaroski T. Chandrasekhar R. Sandbank M. (2013). Social communication intervention effects vary by dependent variable type in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention 7(4) 150–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2014.917780 10.1080/17489539.2014.917780
Metrics
29
Citations
47
References
Details
Published
Oct 03, 2022
Vol/Issue
27(4)
Pages
890-904
License
View
Authors
K
Kristen Bottema-Beutel

Boston College, USA

S
Shannon Crowley LaPoint

Boston College, USA

S
So Yoon Kim

Duksung Women’s University, South Korea

S
Sarah Mohiuddin

Boston College, USA

Q
Qun Yu

Boston College, USA

R
Rachael McKinnon

Boston College, USA

Funding
The Michael and Susan Argyelan Family Foundation, Administered by the Lynch of Education and Human Development, Boston College
Cite This Article
Kristen Bottema-Beutel, Shannon Crowley LaPoint, So Yoon Kim, et al. (2022). An evaluation of intervention research for transition-age autistic youth. Autism, 27(4), 890-904. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221128761
Related

You May Also Like

The Prevalence of Anxiety and Mood Problems among Children with Autism and Asperger Syndrome

Joseph A. Kim, Peter Szatmari · 2000

676 citations

What should autism research focus upon? Community views and priorities from the United Kingdom

Elizabeth Pellicano, Adam Dinsmore · 2014

632 citations

Parenting stress and psychological functioning among mothers of preschool children with autism and developmental delay

Annette Estes, Jeffrey Munson · 2009

627 citations

Making the future together: Shaping autism research through meaningful participation

Sue Fletcher-Watson, Jon Adams · 2018

594 citations

Sensory processing in adults with autism spectrum disorders

Laura Crane, Lorna Goddard · 2009

485 citations