journal article Open Access Mar 15, 2022

Characterization of advanced Parkinson’s disease in Germany: results of the non-interventional OBSERVE-PD study

View at Publisher Save 10.1186/s42466-022-00176-x
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive, neurodegenerative disorder. In the advanced stages it can result in severe disability despite optimal treatment. Data suggests heterogeneous classification of PD stages among physicians in different countries. The purpose of the OBSERVE-PD study was to evaluate the proportion of patients with advanced PD (APD) according to physicians’ judgments in an international cohort.

Methods
A cross-sectional, observational study was conducted in 18 countries. Data were collected during a single patient visit. Demographic data, disease status, current medical treatment, and quality of life were evaluated for the German cohort and compared to the international cohort. Potential prognostic factors of physicians’ classification of APD in the German and international cohorts were identified using logistic regression.

Results
In total, 177 German and 2438 international patients were enrolled. 68.9% of the German and 50.0% of the international patients were classified by physicians as APD. Despite similar demographics and comparable disease severity, motor fluctuations (odds ratio [OR], 49.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5–291.9) and current device-aided treatment (OR 8.7; CI 5.5–13.8) showed the strongest association to physicians’ classification of APD in the German and the international cohorts, respectively. The number of different oral anti-Parkinson-medications showed opposed associations with APD-classification between the international (OR 1.19; CI 1.03–1.37) and German (OR 0.46; CI 0.18–1.18) cohort. Although 58.2% of the German patients diagnosed with APD were considered eligible for device-aided treatment, only 40.8% actually received it.

Conclusions
This study highlights the challenges in the recognition and the effective management of APD in Germany and emphasizes the necessity of complying with standard diagnostic criteria for identification of patients with APD. Therapeutic approaches differed internationally, with a tendency in Germany towards a more complex oral medication regimen for patients with APD. In view of similar quality of life and disease status in both cohorts, our findings may prompt further exploration of parameters for disease classifications, and consideration of optimal treatment strategies.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
21
[1]
Poewe, W., & Mahlknecht, P. (2009). The clinical progression of Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 15, S28–S32. 10.1016/s1353-8020(09)70831-4
[2]
Hoehn, M. M., & Yahr, M. D. (1998). Parkinsonism: Onset, progression, and mortality. Neurology, 50(2), 318. 10.1212/wnl.50.2.318
[3]
Lang, A. E., & Lozano, A. M. (1998). Medical progress: Parkinson’s disease (second of two parts). New England Journal of Medicine, 339, 1130–1143. 10.1056/nejm199810153391607
[4]
Lang, A. E., & Lozano, A. M. (1998). Parkinson’s disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 339(15), 1044–1053. 10.1056/nejm199810083391506
[5]
Olanow, C. W., Watts, R. L., & Koller, W. C. (2001). An algorithm (decision tree) for the management of Parkinson’s disease (2001): Treatment guidelines. Neurology, 56(11 Suppl 5), S1-s88. 10.1212/wnl.56.suppl_5.s1
[6]
Fabbri, M., Coelho, M., Guedes, L. C., Chendo, I., Sousa, C., Rosa, M. M., Abreu, D., Costa, N., Godinho, C., Antonini, A., & Ferreira, J. J. (2017). Response of non-motor symptoms to levodopa in late-stage Parkinson’s disease: Results of a levodopa challenge test. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 39, 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.02.007 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.02.007
[7]
Nonnekes, J., Timmer, M. H., de Vries, N. M., Rascol, O., Helmich, R. C., & Bloem, B. R. (2016). Unmasking levodopa resistance in Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders, 31(11), 1602–1609. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26712 10.1002/mds.26712
[8]
Krüger, R., Klucken, J., Weiss, D., Tönges, L., Kolber, P., Unterecker, S., Lorrain, M., Baas, H., Müller, T., & Riederer, P. (2017). Classification of advanced stages of Parkinson’s disease: Translation into stratified treatments. Journal of Neural Transmission, 124(8), 1015–1027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-017-1707-x 10.1007/s00702-017-1707-x
[9]
Fasano, A., Fung, V. S. C., Lopiano, L., Elibol, B., Smolentseva, I. G., Seppi, K., Takats, A., Onuk, K., Parra, J. C., Bergmann, L., Sail, K., Jalundhwala, Y., & Pirtosek, Z. (2019). Characterizing advanced Parkinson’s disease: OBSERVE-PD observational study results of 2615 patients. BMC Neurology, 19(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-019-1276-8 10.1186/s12883-019-1276-8
[10]
Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases.

A J Hughes, S E Daniel, L Kilford et al.

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psych... 1992 10.1136/jnnp.55.3.181
[11]
Fahn, S., Elton, R., & Members of the UPDRS Development Committee. (1987). The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. In S. Fahn, C. D. Marsden, D. B. Calne, & M. Goldstein (Eds.), Recent developments in Parkinson's disease (Vol. 2, pp. 153–163, 293–304). Florham Park: Macmillan Healthcare Information.
[12]
Goetz, C. G., Poewe, W., Rascol, O., Sampaio, C., Stebbins, G. T., Counsell, C., Giladi, N., Holloway, R. G., Moore, C. G., & Wenning, G. K. (2004). Movement Disorder Society Task Force report on the Hoehn and Yahr staging scale: Status and recommendations the Movement Disorder Society Task Force on rating scales for Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders, 19(9), 1020–1028. 10.1002/mds.20213
[13]
Chaudhuri, K. R, Martinez-Martin, P, Brown, R. G., Sethi, K., Stocchi, F., Odin, P., … Schapira, A. H. (2007). The metric properties of a novel non-motor symptoms scale for Parkinson's disease: Results from an international pilot study. Movement Disorders, 22(13), 1901–1911. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.21596 10.1002/mds.21596
[14]
Jenkinson, C., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2007). Cross-cultural evaluation of the short form 8-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8): Results from America, Canada, Japan, Italy and Spain. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 13(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2006.06.006 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2006.06.006
[15]
Antonini, A., Stoessl, A. J., Kleinman, L. S., Skalicky, A. M., Marshall, T. S., Sail, K. R., Onuk, K., & Odin, P. L. A. (2018). Developing consensus among movement disorder specialists on clinical indicators for identification and management of advanced Parkinson’s disease: A multi-country Delphi-panel approach. Current Medical Research and Opinion. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2018.1502165 10.1080/03007995.2018.1502165
[16]
Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(4), 353–375. 10.1016/s0169-2070(99)00018-7
[17]
Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (2001). Expert opinions in forecasting: The role of the Delphi technique. In J. S. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of forecasting (pp. 125–144). Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3_7
[18]
Busse, R., Blumel, M., Knieps, F., & Barnighausen, T. (2017). Statutory health insurance in Germany: A health system shaped by 135 years of solidarity, self-governance, and competition. Lancet, 390(10097), 882–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31280-1 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31280-1
[19]
Möller, J. C., Baumann, C. R., Burkhard, P. R., Kaelin-Lang, A., Küng, I., Onuk, K., & Bohlhalter, S. (2021). Characterisation of advanced Parkinson’s disease: Observe-PD observational study—Results of the Swiss subgroup. Swiss Medical Weekly, 151, w20419. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2021.20419 10.4414/smw.2021.20419
[20]
Patient Preferences for Device-Aided Treatments Indicated for Advanced Parkinson Disease

Thomas Marshall, Amy Pugh, Angelyn Fairchild et al.

Value in Health 2017 10.1016/j.jval.2017.06.001
[21]
Odin, P., Chaudhuri, K. R., Slevin, J. T., Volkmann, J., Dietrichs, E., Martinez-Martin, P., Krauss, J. K., Henriksen, T., Katzenschlager, R., & Antonini, A. (2015). Collective physician perspectives on non-oral medication approaches for the management of clinically relevant unresolved issues in Parkinson’s disease: Consensus from an international survey and discussion program. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 21(10), 1133–1144. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.07.020
Metrics
10
Citations
21
References
Details
Published
Mar 15, 2022
Vol/Issue
4(1)
License
View
Cite This Article
David J. Pedrosa, Florin Gandor, Wolfgang H. Jost, et al. (2022). Characterization of advanced Parkinson’s disease in Germany: results of the non-interventional OBSERVE-PD study. Neurological Research and Practice, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-022-00176-x
Related

You May Also Like

How to use and assess qualitative research methods

Loraine Busetto, Wolfgang Wick · 2020

870 citations

Recovery from stroke: current concepts and future perspectives

Christian Grefkes, Gereon R. Fink · 2020

427 citations

Diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy

Helmar C. Lehmann, Gilbert Wunderlich · 2020

128 citations