Abstract
Abstract
Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors (IPMSMs) are a leading technology for electric vehicles (EVs) owing to their high efficiency and power density, yet their performance is limited by torque ripple, drive losses, and sensitivity to parameter variations. This paper presents a robust rotor profile optimization (RPO) framework that integrates a modified adaptive particle swarm optimization (MAPSO) algorithm with finite-element analysis to enhance torque production and minimize torque fluctuations. Unlike conventional optimization approaches, the proposed framework incorporates sensitivity and robustness evaluation, ensuring stable performance under input uncertainties. The optimized rotor design achieves an 8.65% increase in average torque (92.45 → 100.45 Nm), a 69.61% reduction in torque ripple (22.17% → 6.74%), and a slight efficiency improvement (97.08% → 97.12%) while maintaining the same 25 kW power rating and 2250 rpm base speed. Additionally, the 6% refers to the overall or representative robustness level, confirming robustness against parameter deviations. These results demonstrate that the proposed optimization method enables reliable rotor geometry refinement within the same motor envelope, leading to higher torque density, reduced pulsations, and improved suitability for high-performance EV traction applications.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
39
[1]
Emadi A (2018) Energy-efficient electric motors, revised and expanded. CRC Press
[2]
Woldegiorgis AT, Ge X, Zuo Y, Wang H, Hassan M (2022) Sensorless control of interior permanent magnet synchronous motor drives considering resistance and permanent magnet flux linkage variation. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 70:7716–7730 10.1109/tie.2022.3224152
[3]
Hassan M, Ge X, Woldegiorgis AT, Mastoi MS, Shahid MB, Atif R et al (2023) A look-up table-based model predictive torque control of IPMSM drives with duty cycle optimization. ISA Trans 138:670–686 10.1016/j.isatra.2023.02.007
[4]
Sardar MU, Manfeng D, Saleem U, Nawaz MK, Hassan M (2022) A scholarly review of methods for design optimization of IPM synchronous motors used in electric vehicles. In: 2022 international conference on emerging trends in electrical, control, and telecommunication engineering (ETECTE), Lahore, Pakistan, pp 1–6 10.1109/etecte55893.2022.10007183
[5]
Sardar MU, Manfeng D, Saleem U, Hassan M, Nawaz MK (2022) State-of-the-art design optimization of an IPM synchronous motor for electric vehicle applications. In: 2022 international conference on emerging trends in electrical, control, and telecommunication engineering (ETECTE), Lahore, Pakistan, pp 1–6. 10.1109/etecte55893.2022.10007182
[6]
Sardar MU, Manfeng D, Hassan M, Saleem U (2023) Robust design optimization of an IPM synchronous motor for electric vehicle applications, In: 2023 IEEE international conference on emerging trends in engineering, sciences and technology (ICES&T), Bahawalpur, Pakistan, 09–11, pp 1–6 10.1109/icest56843.2023.10138867
[7]
Liang J, Parsapour A, Yang Z, Caicedo-Narvaez C, Moallem M, Fahimi B (2019) Optimization of air-gap profile in interior permanent-magnet synchronous motors for torque ripple mitigation. IEEE Trans Transp Electrif 5:118–125 10.1109/tte.2019.2893734
[8]
Ozer K, Yilmaz M (2025) Design and optimization of IPMSM for enhanced efficiency, cost reduction, and performance in light electric vehicles. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3567142 10.1109/access.2025.3567142
[9]
Muazzam H, Ishak MK, Hanif A, Bhatti AI (2022) Compensating thermal derated torque of IPMSM centric electric vehicles. IEEE Access 10:24468–24480 10.1109/access.2022.3155575
[10]
Cho H-J, Kwon Y-C, Sul S-K (2021) Torque ripple-minimizing control of IPMSM with optimized current trajectory. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 57:3852–3862 10.1109/tia.2021.3075424
[11]
Rupam SM, Marwaha A (2023) Finite element based parametric analysis of PMSM for electric vehicle applications. J Eng Sci Technol 18:735–750
[12]
Chen H, Lee CHT (2019) Parametric sensitivity analysis and design optimization of an interior permanent magnet synchronous motor. IEEE Access 7:159918–159929 10.1109/access.2019.2950773
[13]
Sun X, Shi Z, Lei G, Guo Y, Zhu J (2020) Multi-objective design optimization of an IPMSM based on multilevel strategy. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 68:139–148 10.1109/tie.2020.2965463
[14]
Jiang JW, Bilgin B, Yang Y, Sathyan A, Dadkhah H, Emadi A (2016) Rotor skew pattern design and optimisation for cogging torque reduction. IET Electr Syst Transp 6:126–135 10.1049/iet-est.2015.0021
[15]
Islam R, Husain I, Fardoun A, McLaughlin K (2007) Permanent magnet synchronous motor magnet designs with skewing for torque ripple and cogging torque reduction. In: IEEE Ind Appl Annu Meet, IEEE; p 1552–9 10.1109/ias.2007.240
[16]
Chen H-S, Dorrell DG, Tsai M-C (2010) Design and operation of interior permanent-magnet motors with two axial segments and high rotor saliency. IEEE Trans Magn 46:3664–3675 10.1109/tmag.2010.2048037
[17]
Kim K-C (2014) A novel method for minimization of cogging torque and torque ripple for interior permanent magnet synchronous motor. IEEE Trans Magn 50:793–796 10.1109/tmag.2013.2285234
[18]
Tom BE, James AE (2025) Analyzing the effect of asymmetrical thermal flow in three phase induction motor. J Electr Syst Inf Technol 12:59 10.1186/s43067-025-00247-4
[19]
Friday IV, Shehu GS, Olarinoye GA, Jomoh B (2024) Observer-based robust servomechanism control of a three-phase induction motor drive. J Electr Syst Inf Technol 11:39 10.1186/s43067-024-00158-w
[20]
Woldegiorgis AT, Ge X, Hassan M. Advanced disturbance observer-based active flux estimation for sensorless control of IPMSM. In: IET Conf Proc CP766, vol 2020, IET; p 230–5 10.1049/icp.2021.1005
[21]
Hassan M, Ge X, Atif R, Woldegiorgis AT, Mastoi MS, Shahid MB (2022) Computational efficient model predictive current control for interior permanent magnet synchronous motor drives. IET Power Electron. https://doi.org/10.1049/pel2.12294 10.1049/pel2.12294
[22]
Hassan M, Zhang G, Mastoi MS, Li Z, Yu X, Xu K et al (2025) Optimising weighting factor design for model predictive torque control in IPMSM drives: a grey relational analysis approach. IET Power Electron 18:e70053 10.1049/pel2.70053
[23]
Ganesh CJ, Vijay GS, Siddappa IB (2022) Modelling of interior permanent magnet motor and optimization of its torque ripple and cogging torque based on design of experiments and artificial neural networks. Eng Sci 18:193–203
[25]
Abdel Ghany MA, Bahgat ME, Refaey WM, Sharaf S (2020) Practical interval type-2 fuzzy self-tuning of PID controller to servo permanent magnet synchronous motor. J Electr Syst Inf Technol 7:1 10.1186/s43067-019-0008-x
[26]
Hassan M, Shaikh MS, Mastoi MS, Atif R, Farhan M, Amjad M et al (2024) Classical and predictive control of interior permanent magnet synchronous motor for railway application. The internet of energy. Apple Academic Press, pp 227–250
[27]
Woldegiorgis AT, Ge X, Wang H, Hassan M (2020) A new frequency adaptive second-order disturbance observer for sensorless vector control of interior permanent magnet synchronous motor. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 68:11847–11857 10.1109/tie.2020.3047065
[28]
Woldegiorgis AT, Ge X, Li S, Hassan M (2019) Extended sliding mode disturbance observer-based sensorless control of IPMSM for medium and high-speed range considering railway application. IEEE Access 7:175302–175312 10.1109/access.2019.2957274
[29]
Tang N, Brown IP (2022) Low space harmonic content windings (LSHWs) applied to improve the Pareto front in design optimization of electric machines. In: 2022 IEEE Energy Convers Congr Expo, IEEE; p 1–8 10.1109/ecce50734.2022.9947710
[30]
Li W, He Y (2022) Parameterization and performance of permanent magnet synchronous motor for vehicle based on Motor‐CAD and OptiSlang. Wirel Commun Mob Comput 2022:8217386 10.1155/2022/8217386
[31]
Li C, Cui H, Bu F, Liu J (2021) Multi objective optimization design of permanent magnet ring torque motor based on response surface method. In: 2021 24th Int Conf Electr Mach Syst, IEEE; p 1204–8 10.23919/icems52562.2021.9634345
[32]
Liu Y, Liu L, Yang L, Hao L, Bao Y (2021) Measuring distance using ultra-wideband radio technology enhanced by extreme gradient boosting decision tree (XGBoost). Autom Constr 126:103678 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103678
[33]
Ban B, Stipetic S (2022) Systematic metamodel-based optimization study of synchronous reluctance machine rotor barrier topologies. Machines 10:712 10.3390/machines10080712
[34]
Naik S, Bag B, Chandrasekaran K (2023) Design optimization of Spoke IPM motor for improving efficiency using PSO and Rao-1 algorithm based FEA. Mater Today Proc 80:400–408 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.10.188
[35]
Liu Y, Bao Y (2023) Real-time remote measurement of distance using ultra-wideband (UWB) sensors. Autom Constr 150:104849 10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104849
[36]
Zhang H, Razmjooy N (2024) Optimal elman neural network based on improved gorilla troops optimizer for short-term electricity price prediction. J Electr Eng Technol 19:161–175 10.1007/s42835-023-01556-2
[37]
Jang GU, Kim C-W, Bae D, Cho Y, Lee J-J, Cho S (2020) Reliability-based robust design optimization for torque ripple reduction considering manufacturing uncertainty of interior permanent magnet synchronous motor. J Mech Sci Technol 34:1249–1256 10.1007/s12206-020-0223-3
[38]
Yoon K-Y, Kwon B-I (2016) Optimal design of a new interior permanent magnet motor using a flared-shape arrangement of ferrite magnets. IEEE Trans Magn 52:1–4 10.1109/tmag.2016.2524505
[39]
Park J-C, Park S-H, Kim J-H, Lee S-G, Lee G-H, Lim M-S (2021) Diagnosis and robust design optimization of SPMSM considering back EMF and cogging torque due to static eccentricity. Energies 14:2900 10.3390/en14102900
Metrics
1
Citations
39
References
Details
Published
Dec 11, 2025
Vol/Issue
12(1)
License
View
Cite This Article
Muhammad Usman Sardar, Mannan Hassan, Muhammad Shahid Mastoi, et al. (2025). Rotor profile optimization for high-performance IPMSMs in electric vehicles. Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43067-025-00304-y
Related

You May Also Like