journal article Mar 10, 2012

Challenges in Development of Nanoparticle-Based Therapeutics

View at Publisher Save 10.1208/s12248-012-9339-4
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
96
[1]
Emerich DF, Thanos CG. The pinpoint promise of nanoparticle-based drug delivery and molecular diagnosis. Biomol Eng. 2006;23(4):171–84. 10.1016/j.bioeng.2006.05.026
[2]
Alonso MJ. Nanomedicines for overcoming biological barriers. Biomed Pharmacother Biomed Pharmacother. 2004;58(3):168–72. 10.1016/j.biopha.2004.01.007
[3]
Silva GA. Nanotechnology approaches to crossing the blood–brain barrier and drug delivery to the CNS. BMC Neurosci. 2008;9 Suppl 3:S4. 10.1186/1471-2202-9-s3-s4
[4]
Jang SH, Wientjes MG, Lu D, Au JL. Drug delivery and transport to solid tumors. Pharm Res. 2003;20(9):1337–50. 10.1023/a:1025785505977
[5]
Maeda H, Sawa T, Konno T. Mechanism of tumor-targeted delivery of macromolecular drugs, including the EPR effect in solid tumor and clinical overview of the prototype polymeric drug SMANCS. J Control Release. 2001;74(1–3):47–61. 10.1016/s0168-3659(01)00309-1
[6]
Jain RK. Transport of molecules across tumor vasculature. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1987;6(4):559–93. 10.1007/bf00047468
[7]
Netti PA, Berk DA, Swartz MA, Grodzinsky AJ, Jain RK. Role of extracellular matrix assembly in interstitial transport in solid tumors. Cancer Res. 2000;60(9):2497–503.
[8]
Dong X, Mumper RJ. Nanomedicinal strategies to treat multidrug-resistant tumors: current progress. Nanomedicine (London, England). 2010;5(4):597–615. 10.2217/nnm.10.35
[9]
Greish K. Enhanced permeability and retention of macromolecular drugs in solid tumors: a royal gate for targeted anticancer nanomedicines. J Drug Target. 2007;15(7–8):457–64. 10.1080/10611860701539584
[10]
Hawkins MJ, Soon-Shiong P, Desai N. Protein nanoparticles as drug carriers in clinical medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60(8):876–85. 10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.044
[11]
Gelderblom H, Verweij J, Nooter K, Sparreboom A. Cremophor EL: the drawbacks and advantages of vehicle selection for drug formulation. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37(13):1590–8. 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00171-x
[12]
Weiss RB, Donehower RC, Wiernik PH, Ohnuma T, Gralla RJ, Trump DL, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions from taxol. J Clin Oncol. 1990;8(7):1263–8. 10.1200/jco.1990.8.7.1263
[13]
van Zuylen L, Verweij J, Sparreboom A. Role of formulation vehicles in taxane pharmacology. Invest New Drugs. 2001;19(2):125–41. 10.1023/a:1010618632738
[14]
Steele RH, Limaye S, Cleland B, Chow J, Suranyi MG. Hypersensitivity reactions to the polysorbate contained in recombinant erythropoietin and darbepoietin. Nephrology (Carlton). 2005;10(3):317–20. 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2005.00389.x
[15]
Lammers T, Hennink WE, Storm G. Tumour-targeted nanomedicines: principles and practice. Br J Cancer. 2008;99(3):392–7. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604483
[16]
Allen TM. Ligand-targeted therapeutics in anticancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2(10):750–63. 10.1038/nrc903
[17]
Duncan R. Polymer conjugates as anticancer nanomedicines. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(9):688–701. 10.1038/nrc1958
[18]
Gupta B, Levchenko TS, Torchilin VP. Intracellular delivery of large molecules and small particles by cell-penetrating proteins and peptides. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57(4):637–51. 10.1016/j.addr.2004.10.007
[19]
Holig P, Bach M, Volkel T, Nahde T, Hoffmann S, Muller R, et al. Novel RGD lipopeptides for the targeting of liposomes to integrin-expressing endothelial and melanoma cells. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2004;17(5):433–41. 10.1093/protein/gzh055
[20]
Schiffelers RM, Koning GA, ten Hagen TL, Fens MH, Schraa AJ, Janssen AP, et al. Anti-tumor efficacy of tumor vasculature-targeted liposomal doxorubicin. J Control Release. 2003;91(1–2):115–22. 10.1016/s0168-3659(03)00240-2
[21]
Danhier F, Vroman B, Lecouturier N, Crokart N, Pourcelle V, Freichels H, et al. Targeting of tumor endothelium by RGD-grafted PLGA-nanoparticles loaded with paclitaxel. J Control Release. 2009;140(2):166–73. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.08.011
[22]
Desai N, Trieu V, Yao Z, Louie L, Ci S, Yang A, et al. Increased antitumor activity, intratumor paclitaxel concentrations, and endothelial cell transport of Cremophor-free, albumin-bound paclitaxel, ABI-007, compared with Cremophor-based paclitaxel. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(4):1317–24. 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-05-1634
[23]
Sandhiya S, Dkhar SA, Surendiran A. Emerging trends of nanomedicine—an overview. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2009;23(3):263–9. 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2009.00692.x
[24]
Moghimi SM, Hunter AC, Murray JC. Long-circulating and target-specific nanoparticles: theory to practice. Pharmacol Rev. 2001;53(2):283–318. 10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01494-7
[25]
Gaumet M, Vargas A, Gurny R, Delie F. Nanoparticles for drug delivery: the need for precision in reporting particle size parameters. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2008;69(1):1–9. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2007.08.001
[26]
Douglas SJ, Davis SS, Illum L. Nanoparticles in drug delivery. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 1987;3(3):233–61.
[27]
Yuan F, Dellian M, Fukumura D, Leunig M, Berk DA, Torchilin VP, et al. Vascular permeability in a human tumor xenograft: molecular size dependence and cutoff size. Cancer Res. 1995;55(17):3752–6.
[28]
Hobbs SK, Monsky WL, Yuan F, Roberts WG, Griffith L, Torchilin VP, et al. Regulation of transport pathways in tumor vessels: role of tumor type and microenvironment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(8):4607–12. 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4607
[29]
Haley B, Frenkel E. Nanoparticles for drug delivery in cancer treatment. Urol Oncol. 2008;26(1):57–64. 10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.03.015
[30]
Moghimi SM. Modulation of lymphatic distribution of subcutaneously injected poloxamer 407-coated nanospheres: the effect of the ethylene oxide chain configuration. FEBS Lett. 2003;540(1–3):241–4. 10.1016/s0014-5793(03)00273-4
[31]
Moghimi SM, Szebeni J. Stealth liposomes and long circulating nanoparticles: critical issues in pharmacokinetics, opsonization and protein-binding properties. Prog Lipid Res. 2003;42(6):463–78. 10.1016/s0163-7827(03)00033-x
[32]
Gessner A, Waicz R, Lieske A, Paulke B, Mader K, Muller RH. Nanoparticles with decreasing surface hydrophobicities: influence on plasma protein adsorption. Int J Pharm. 2000;196(2):245–9. 10.1016/s0378-5173(99)00432-9
[33]
Gigli I, Nelson Jr RA. Complement dependent immune phagocytosis. I. Requirements for C’1, C’4, C’2, C’3. Exp Cell Res. 1968;51(1):45–67. 10.1016/0014-4827(68)90158-4
[34]
Bertholon I, Vauthier C, Labarre D. Complement activation by core-shell poly(isobutylcyanoacrylate)-polysaccharide nanoparticles: influences of surface morphology, length, and type of polysaccharide. Pharm Res. 2006;23(6):1313–23. 10.1007/s11095-006-0069-0
[35]
Lasic DD. Doxorubicin in sterically stabilized liposomes. Nature. 1996;380(6574):561–2. 10.1038/380561a0
[36]
Huang YF, Liu H, Xiong X, Chen Y, Tan W. Nanoparticle-mediated IgE-receptor aggregation and signaling in RBL mast cells. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131(47):17328–34. 10.1021/ja907125t
[37]
Irvine DJ. Drug delivery: one nanoparticle, one kill. Nat Mater. 2011;10(5):342–3. 10.1038/nmat3014
[38]
Bandyopadhyay A, Fine RL, Demento S, Bockenstedt LK, Fahmy TM. The impact of nanoparticle ligand density on dendritic-cell targeted vaccines. Biomaterials. 2011;32(11):3094–105. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.12.054
[39]
O’Brien ME, Wigler N, Inbar M, Rosso R, Grischke E, Santoro A, et al. Reduced cardiotoxicity and comparable efficacy in a phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (CAELYX/Doxil) versus conventional doxorubicin for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2004;15(3):440–9. 10.1093/annonc/mdh097
[40]
Szebeni J, Baranyi L, Savay S, Milosevits J, Bunger R, Laverman P, et al. Role of complement activation in hypersensitivity reactions to Doxil and hynic PEG liposomes: experimental and clinical studies. J Liposome Res. 2002;12(1–2):165–72. 10.1081/lpr-120004790
[41]
Chan S, Davidson N, Juozaityte E, Erdkamp F, Pluzanska A, Azarnia N, et al. Phase III trial of liposomal doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide compared with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2004;15(10):1527–34. 10.1093/annonc/mdh393
[42]
Waterhouse DN, Tardi PG, Mayer LD, Bally MB. A comparison of liposomal formulations of doxorubicin with drug administered in free form: changing toxicity profiles. Drug Saf. 2001;24(12):903–20. 10.2165/00002018-200124120-00004
[43]
Feng SS, Mu L, Win KY, Huang G. Nanoparticles of biodegradable polymers for clinical administration of paclitaxel. Curr Med Chem. 2004;11(4):413–24. 10.2174/0929867043455909
[44]
Li L, Wartchow CA, Danthi SN, Shen Z, Dechene N, Pease J, et al. A novel antiangiogenesis therapy using an integrin antagonist or anti-Flk-1 antibody coated 90Y-labeled nanoparticles. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;58(4):1215–27. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.057
[45]
Farokhzad OC, Cheng J, Teply BA, Sherifi I, Jon S, Kantoff PW, et al. Targeted nanoparticle-aptamer bioconjugates for cancer chemotherapy in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(16):6315–20. 10.1073/pnas.0601755103
[46]
Rovira-Bru M, Thompson DH, Szleifer I. Size and structure of spontaneously forming liposomes in lipid/PEG-lipid mixtures. Biophys J. 2002;83(5):2419–39. 10.1016/s0006-3495(02)75255-7
[47]
Allen C, Dos Santos N, Gallagher R, Chiu GN, Shu Y, Li WM, et al. Controlling the physical behavior and biological performance of liposome formulations through use of surface grafted poly(ethylene glycol). Biosci Rep. 2002;22(2):225–50. 10.1023/a:1020186505848
[48]
Zhu J, Xue J, Guo Z, Marchant RE. Vesicle size and stability of biomimetic liposomes from 3′-sulfo-Lewis a (SuLea) containing glycolipids. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces. 2007;58(2):242–9. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.03.016
[49]
FDA. Guidance for Industry: Liposome Drug Products. 2002. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm070570.pdf .
[50]
Özcan I, Bouchemal K, Segura-Sánchez F, Abacı Ö, Özer Ö, Güneri T, et al. Effects of sterilization techniques on the PEGylated poly (γ-benzyl-l-glutamate) (PBLG) nanoparticles. Acta Pharm Sci. 2009;51:211–8.

Showing 50 of 96 references

Cited By
971
International Journal of Pharmaceut...
Pharmaceutics
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)...
Biomaterials Research
Advances in Lung Cancer Treatment Using Nanomedicines

Akshansh Sharma, Devanshi Shambhwani · 2022

ACS Omega
Nanomaterials
Seminars in Cancer Biology
Journal of Drug Delivery Science an...
Advanced Materials
The battle of “nano” paclitaxel

Alexandros Marios Sofias, Michael Dunne · 2017

Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
Bovine milk-derived exosomes for drug delivery

Radha Munagala, Farrukh Aqil · 2016

Cancer Letters
Nano Research
Metrics
971
Citations
96
References
Details
Published
Mar 10, 2012
Vol/Issue
14(2)
Pages
282-295
License
View
Cite This Article
Neil Desai (2012). Challenges in Development of Nanoparticle-Based Therapeutics. The AAPS Journal, 14(2), 282-295. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-012-9339-4
Related

You May Also Like

Therapeutic Roles of Curcumin: Lessons Learned from Clinical Trials

Subash C. Gupta, Sridevi Patchva · 2012

1,664 citations

Effects of protein aggregates: An immunologic perspective

Amy S. Rosenberg · 2006

1,201 citations

Protein aggregation and bioprocessing

Mary E. M. Cromwell, Eric Hilario · 2006

658 citations