journal article Jul 01, 2015

Bonus Payments and Reference Point Violations

View at Publisher Save 10.1287/mnsc.2014.1949
Abstract
We investigate how bonus payments affect the satisfaction and performance of managers in a large multinational company. We find that falling behind a natural reference standard for a fair bonus payment (a “reference point violation”) reduces satisfaction and subsequent performance. The effects are mitigated if information about one’s relative standing toward the reference point is withheld. A model and a laboratory experiment provide complementary insights and additional robustness checks. This paper was accepted by Uri Gneezy, behavioral economics.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
64
[2]
Ariely D RAND J. Econom. (2005)
[3]
Barankay I (2012) Rank incentives: Evidence from a randomized workplace experiment. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
[4]
Disappointment in Decision Making Under Uncertainty

David E. Bell

Operations Research 10.1287/opre.33.1.1
[7]
Bolton GE Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991)
[8]
ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition

Gary E Bolton, Axel Ockenfels

American Economic Review 10.1257/aer.90.1.166
[10]
Bolton GE Econom. J. (2005)
[16]
Relative Income, Happiness, and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles

Andrew E Clark, Paul Frijters, Michael A Shields

Journal of Economic Literature 10.1257/jel.46.1.95
[19]
Exposing Pay Secrecy

Adrienne Colella, Ramona L. Paetzold, Asghar Zardkoohi et al.

The Academy of Management Review 10.5465/amr.2007.23463701
[20]
Cooper DJ (2014)
[21]
Demougin D, Fluet C (2003) Inequity aversion in tournaments. CIRPEE Working Paper 03-22, Centre interuniversitaire sur le risque, les politiques économiques et l’emploi, Montreal. 10.2139/ssrn.409560
[24]
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation

E. Fehr, K. M. Schmidt

The Quarterly Journal of Economics 10.1162/003355399556151
[26]
Does Fairness Prevent Market Clearing? An Experimental Investigation

E. Fehr, G. Kirchsteiger, A. Riedl

The Quarterly Journal of Economics 10.2307/2118338
[28]
z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments

Urs Fischbacher

Experimental Economics 10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4
[29]
Frank RH Amer. Econom. Rev. (1984)
[30]
Frank RH Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985)
[34]
Freeman RB Amer. Econom. Rev. (1978)
[37]
Gartenberg C, Wulf J (2013) Pay harmony: Peer comparison and executive compensation. Working paper, New York University, New York. 10.2139/ssrn.2256704
[38]
Greiner B (2004)
[41]
Hamermesh D (1977)
[44]
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk

Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky

Econometrica 10.2307/1914185
[47]
Kwon I, Meyersson Milgrom E (2009) Status in the workplace: Evidence from M&A. Working paper, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. 10.2139/ssrn.1544547
[48]
Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts

Edward P. Lazear, Sherwin Rosen

Journal of Political Economy 10.1086/261010

Showing 50 of 64 references

Metrics
114
Citations
64
References
Details
Published
Jul 01, 2015
Vol/Issue
61(7)
Pages
1496-1513
Cite This Article
Axel Ockenfels, Dirk Sliwka, Peter Werner (2015). Bonus Payments and Reference Point Violations. Management Science, 61(7), 1496-1513. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1949
Related

You May Also Like

User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models

Fred D. Davis, Richard P. Bagozzi · 1989

15,829 citations

Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design

Richard L. Daft, Robert H. Lengel · 1986

6,367 citations

Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment

R. E. Bellman, L. A. Zadeh · 1970

5,835 citations