journal article Dec 01, 2012

Open or closed geochemical systems during diagenesis in sedimentary basins: Constraints on mass transfer during diagenesis and the prediction of porosity in sandstone and carbonate reservoirs

View at Publisher Save 10.1306/04301211139
Abstract
Abstract
Descriptions of mineralogy and textural relationships in sandstones and limestones have been used to establish a sequence of diagenetic events (epigenesis), involving mineral dissolution and precipitation, which have been interpreted to have occurred during the burial history. Published epigenetic sequences commonly imply a geochemically open system with very significant changes in the bulk chemical composition of the sediments during burial. Near-surface diagenetic reactions may be open, involving significant changes in the sediment composition and formation of secondary porosity caused by high pore-water flow rates of meteoric water or reactions with sea water near the sea floor. Calculations show that the bulk chemical composition of the sediments below the reach of high pore-water flow rates of meteoric water or hydrothermal convection should remain nearly constant during progressive burial because of limited pore-water flow. Mass transport between shales and sandstones is also limited because the pore water is, in most cases, buffered by the same minerals so that the concentration gradients are low. Recent studies show that silica released from clay-mineral reactions in mudstones has been precipitated locally as small quartz crystals and not exported to adjacent sandstones. If the geochemical constraints for mass transfer during burial diagenetic reactions are accepted, the chemical reactions involved in diagenesis can be written as balanced equations. This offers the possibility to make predictions about reservoir quality based on assumptions about primary sediment composition related to facies and provenance. Large-scale changes in the bulk composition of sandstones and mudstones during burial diagenesis have been suggested, but because such changes cannot be explained chemically and physically, no predictions can be made. Burial diagenetic processes are, in most cases, not episodic but occur as slow adjustments to increased stress and temperature, driving the sediments toward increased mechanical and thermodynamic stability. As a result, the porosity of a single lithology must decrease during progressive burial, but each lithology has a different porosity curve. This article discusses quantitative calculations and estimates that show clearly that burial diagenesis must represent geochemically nearly closed systems where mineral dissolution and precipitation must be balanced. This provides a theoretical basis for the modeling and prediction of reservoir quality.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
87
[1]
Ague "Evidence for major mass transfer and volume strain during regional metamorphism of pelites" Geology (1991) 10.1130/0091-7613(1991)019<0855:efmmta>2.3.co;2
[2]
Sandstone reservoir quality prediction: The state of the art

Joanna M. Ajdukiewicz, Robert H. Lander

AAPG Bulletin 2010 10.1306/intro060110
[3]
Ajdukiewicz "Prediction of deep reservoir quality using early diagenetic process models in the Jurassic Norphlet Formation, Gulf of Mexico" AAPG Bulletin (2010) 10.1306/04211009152
[4]
Barth "Organic acids from source rock maturation: Generation potentials, transport mechanisms and relevance for mineral diagenesis" (1993) 10.1016/0883-2927(93)90002-x
[5]
Becker "A 48-m.y. history of fracture opening, temperature, and fluid pressure: Cretaceous Travis Peak Formation, East Texas Basin" Geological Society of America Bulletin (2010) 10.1130/b30067.1
[6]
Berner (1980)
[7]
Berner "Early diagenesis: A theoretical approach" (1980)
[8]
Bjørkum "Temperature-controlled porosity/permeability reduction, fluid migration and petroleum exploration in sedimentary basins" Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association Journal (1998)
[9]
Bjørkum "The role of the late Cimmerian unconformity for the distribution of kaolinite in the Gullfaks field, northern North Sea" Sedimentology (1990) 10.1111/j.1365-3091.1990.tb00143.x
[10]
Bjørkum "Porosity prediction in quartzose sandstones as a function of time, temperature, depth, stylolite frequency, and hydrocarbon saturation" AAPG Bulletin (1998)
[11]
Bjørkum "Thermally driven porosity reduction: Impact on basin subsidence" (2001)
[12]
Bjørlykke "Formation of secondary porosity: How important is it?" (1984)
[13]
Fluid flow in sedimentary basins

Knut Bjørlykke

Sedimentary Geology 1993 10.1016/0037-0738(93)90137-t
[14]
Bjørlykke "Fluid-flow processes and diagenesis in sedimentary basins" (1994)
[15]
Bjørlykke "Lithological control on fluid flow in sedimentary basins" (1996)
[16]
Bjørlykke "Principal aspects of compaction and fluid flow in mudstones" (1999)
[17]
Bjørlykke (2010)
[19]
Bjørlykke "Clay minerals in North Sea sandstones" (1992)
[20]
Bjørlykke "Quartz cementation in sedimentary basins" AAPG Bulletin (1993)
[21]
Bjørlykke "Salinity variations in North Sea Formation water: Implications for large-scale fluid movements" Marine and Petroleum Geology (1994) 10.1016/0264-8172(94)90003-5
[22]
Bjørlykke "Diagenesis and reservoir properties of Jurassic sandstones from the Haltenbanken area, offshore mid-Norway" (1986)
[23]
Bjørlykke "Modeling of thermal convection in sedimentary basins" Marine and Petroleum Geology (1988) 10.1016/0264-8172(88)90027-x
[24]
Bjørlykke "Geochemical constraints from formation-water analyses from the North Sea and Gulf Coast Basin on quartz, feldspar and illite precipitation in reservoir rocks" (1995)
[25]
Boggs (2011)
[26]
Boles "Evolution of a hydrocarbon migration pathway along basin-bounding faults: Evidence from fault cement" AAPG Bulletin (2004) 10.1306/02090403040
[27]
Burley "The development and destruction of porosity within Upper Jurassic reservoir sandstones of the Piper and Tartan fields: Outer Moray Firth, North Sea" Clay Minerals (1986) 10.1180/claymin.1986.021.4.14
[28]
Burley (2003)
[29]
de Caritat "Note on the maximum upward migration of pore water in response to sediment compaction" Sedimentary Geology (1989) 10.1016/0037-0738(89)90035-3
[30]
Choquette "Geologic nomenclature and classification of porosity in sedimentary carbonates" AAPG Bulletin (1970)
[31]
Chuhan "Closed-system burial diagenesis in reservoir sandstones: Examples from the Garn Formation at Haltenbanken area, offshore mid-Norway" Journal of Sedimentary Research (2001) 10.1306/041100710015
[32]
Chuhan "Porosity loss in sand by grain crushing: Experimental evidence and relevance to reservoir quality" Marine and Petroleum Geology (2002) 10.1016/s0264-8172(01)00049-6
[33]
Chuhan "Experimental compression of loose sands simulating porosity reduction in petroleum reservoirs during burial" Canadian Geotechnical Journal (2003) 10.1139/t03-050
[34]
Croizé "Physical properties of bioclastic carbonates: Implications for porosity controls during burial" Marine and Petroleum Geology (2010) 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.11.008
[35]
Day-Stirrat "Open-system chemical behavior in deep Wilcox Group mudstones, Texas Gulf Coast, U.S.A." Marine and Petroleum Geology (2010) 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2010.08.006
[36]
Day-Stirrat "Discussion in response to Knut Bjørlykke regarding JMPG_1376 “Open-system chemical behavior in deep Wilcox Group mudstones, Texas Gulf Coast, U.S.A.”" Marine and Petroleum Geology (2011) 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2011.01.010
[37]
Origin and evolution of formation waters from oil fields on the Norwegian shelf

Per Kristian Egeberg, Per Aagaard

Applied Geochemistry 1989 10.1016/0883-2927(89)90044-9
[38]
Ehrenberg "Cement geochemistry of photozoan carbonate strata (Upper Carboniferous and Lower Permian), Finnmark carbonate platform, Barents Sea" Journal of Sedimentary Research (2002) 10.1306/050701720095
[39]
Ehrenberg "Carbonate porosity creation by mesogenetic dissolution: Reality or illusion?" AAPG Bulletin (2012) 10.1306/05031110187
[40]
Eichhubl "Focused fluid flow along faults in the Monterey Formation, coastal California" Geological Society of America Bulletin (2000) 10.1130/0016-7606(2000)112<1667:fffafi>2.0.co;2
[41]
Esteban "Secondary porosity development during late burial of carbonate reservoirs as a result of mixing and cooling brines" (2003) 10.1016/s0375-6742(03)00111-0
[42]
Fawad "Microfabric and rock properties of experimentally compressed silt-clay mixtures" Marine and Petroleum Geology (2010) 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.10.002
[43]
Fawad "Compaction and seismic velocities measurements in sands with different textural and mineralogical compositions as functions of effective stress" Geophysical Prospecting (2011) 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00951.x
[44]
Gier "Diagenesis and reservoir quality of Miocene sandstones in the Vienna Basin, Austria" Marine and Petroleum Geology (2008) 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2008.06.001
[45]
Giles (1997)
[46]
Constraints on the development of secondary porosity in the subsurface: Re-evaluation of processes

Melvyn R. Giles, JAMES D. MARSHALL

Marine and Petroleum Geology 1986 10.1016/0264-8172(86)90048-6
[47]
Giles "The origin of large-scale quartz cementation: Evidence from large data sets and coupled heat-fluid mass-transport modeling" (2000)
[48]
Gluyas "Quartz cement: The Miller's tale" (2000)
[49]
Material flux and porosity changes during sediment diagenesis

Jon Gluyas, Max Coleman

Nature 1992 10.1038/356052a0
[50]
Gran "Fluid salinity and dynamics in the North Sea and Haltenbanken basins derived from well-log data" (1992)

Showing 50 of 87 references

Metrics
364
Citations
87
References
Details
Published
Dec 01, 2012
Vol/Issue
96(12)
Pages
2193-2214
Cite This Article
Knut Bjørlykke, Jens Jahren (2012). Open or closed geochemical systems during diagenesis in sedimentary basins: Constraints on mass transfer during diagenesis and the prediction of porosity in sandstone and carbonate reservoirs. AAPG Bulletin, 96(12), 2193-2214. https://doi.org/10.1306/04301211139