journal article Apr 15, 2021

Principles to tailor the saturable and reverse saturable absorption of epsilon-near-zero material

View at Publisher Save 10.1364/prj.417642
Abstract
Indium tin oxide (ITO) films have recently emerged as a new class of functional materials for nonlinear optical (NLO) devices due to their exotic properties around epsilon-near-zero (ENZ) wavelength. Here, we experimentally investigated and tailored the NLO absorption properties of ITO films. The NLO absorption response of ITO films is investigated by using the femtosecond Z-scan measurement technique at two different wavelengths of 1030 nm (out of ENZ region) and 1440 nm (within ENZ region). Interestingly, we observed conversion behavior from saturable absorption (SA) to reverse saturable absorption (RSA) at 1030 nm with the increasing incident laser intensity, whereas only SA behavior was observed at 1440 nm. We demonstrate that SA behavior was ascribed to ground-state free electrons bleaching in the conduction band, and RSA was attributed to three-photon absorption. Moreover, results reveal that ITO film shows more excellent SA performance at 1440 nm with a nonlinear absorption coefficient of




23.2
  
cm
/
GW


and a figure of merit of



1.2
2
×

10


1
6


  
esu
·
cm


. Furthermore, we tailored the SA and RSA behaviors of ITO films at 1030 and 1440 nm wavelengths via post-annealing treatment. The modulatable NLO absorption was ascribed to the changing of free-carrier concentration in ITO films via annealing treatment. The experimental findings offered an inroad for researchers to tailor its NLO absorption properties by changing the free-carrier concentration through chemical modification such as annealing, oxidation, or defect implantation. The superior and tunable nonlinear optical response suggests that ITO film might be employed as a new class material with potential applications in novel optical switches or optical limiters to realize the all-optical information process.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
53
[1]
Wang J. Phys. D (2010) 10.1088/0022-3727/43/3/035403
[2]
Wager Science (2003) 10.1126/science.1085276
[3]
Granqvist Thin Solid Films (2002) 10.1016/s0040-6090(02)00163-3
[4]
Taha Appl. Surf. Sci. (2020) 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147164
[5]
Li Photon. Res. (2020) 10.1364/prj.398450
[6]
Li Photon. Res. (2019) 10.1364/prj.7.000473
[7]
Adams Phys. Rev. Lett. (2011) 10.1103/physrevlett.107.133901
[8]
Wang Phys. Status Solidi A (2019) 10.1002/pssa.201700794
[9]
Javani Phys. Rev. Lett. (2016) 10.1103/physrevlett.117.107404
[10]
Carnemolla Opt. Mater. Express (2018) 10.1364/ome.8.003392
[11]
Kamandi Phys. Rev. B (2017) 10.1103/physrevb.95.161105
[12]
Enhanced Nonlinear Refractive Index inε-Near-Zero Materials

L. Caspani, R. P. M. Kaipurath, M. Clerici et al.

Physical Review Letters 2016 10.1103/physrevlett.116.233901
[13]
Mitoma Appl. Phys. Lett. (2015) 10.1063/1.4907285
[14]
Tuna J. Phys. D (2010) 10.1088/0022-3727/43/5/055402
[15]
Wang Opt. Mater. Express (2015) 10.1364/ome.5.002415
[16]
Peng Appl. Surf. Sci. (2021) 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148104
[17]
Guo Adv. Mater. (2017) 10.1002/adma.201700754
[18]
Guo Opt. Mater. Express (2017) 10.1364/ome.7.003494
[19]
Zhang Appl. Phys. Express (2019) 10.7567/1882-0786/ab21e3
[20]
Xiao Laser Phys. (2020) 10.1088/1555-6611/ab8125
[21]
Guo Nat. Photonics (2016) 10.1038/nphoton.2016.14
[22]
Alam Science (2016) 10.1126/science.aae0330
[23]
Kinsey Optica (2015) 10.1364/optica.2.000616
[24]
Khurgin Optica (2020) 10.1364/optica.374788
[25]
Lu Photon. Res. (2020) 10.1364/prj.395870
[26]
Liu Photon. Res. (2020) 10.1364/prj.389669
[27]
Feng Opt. Express (2020) 10.1364/oe.380903
[28]
Wei Nanoscale (2016) 10.1039/c5nr08457a
[29]
Gu Nano Lett. (2019) 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04221
[30]
Gao Opt. Commun. (2005) 10.1016/j.optcom.2005.03.003
[31]
Ali J. Opt. Soc. Am. B (2020) 10.1364/josab.396327
[32]
George Opt. Mater. Express (2019) 10.1364/ome.9.003911
[33]
Kinsey Opt. Mater. Express (2015) 10.1364/ome.5.002587
[34]
Elim Appl. Phys. B (2006) 10.1007/s00340-005-2079-8
[35]
Park Appl. Surf. Sci. (2014) 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.04.042
[36]
Gessert J. Appl. Phys. (2009) 10.1063/1.3116542
[37]
Rodriguez-Sune APL Photon. (2020) 10.1063/1.5129627
[38]
Hu Vacuum (2004) 10.1016/j.vacuum.2004.01.081
[39]
Robusto Phys. Status Solidi A (1990) 10.1002/pssa.2211190118
[40]
Sheikbahae IEEE J. Quantum Electron. (1990) 10.1109/3.53394
[41]
Gnoli Opt. Express (2005) 10.1364/opex.13.007976
[42]
Falconieri J. Opt. A (1999) 10.1088/1464-4258/1/6/302
[43]
Clerici Nat. Commun. (2017) 10.1038/ncomms15829
[44]
Conforti Phys. Rev. B (2012) 10.1103/physrevb.85.245423
[45]
Scalora Phys. Rev. A (2020) 10.1103/physreva.101.053828
[46]
de Ceglia Sci. Rep. (2018) 10.1038/s41598-018-27655-z
[47]
Kauranen Nat. Photonics (2012) 10.1038/nphoton.2012.244
[48]
del Coso J. Opt. Soc. Am. B (2004) 10.1364/josab.21.000640
[49]
Boyd Opt. Commun. (2014) 10.1016/j.optcom.2014.03.005
[50]
Smith J. Appl. Phys. (1999) 10.1063/1.371675

Showing 50 of 53 references

Cited By
48
Related

You May Also Like

Review of gallium-oxide-based solar-blind ultraviolet photodetectors

Xuanhu Chen, Fangfang Ren · 2019

628 citations

Coupling strategies for silicon photonics integrated chips [Invited]

Riccardo Marchetti, Cosimo Lacava · 2019

571 citations

Deep learning in nano-photonics: inverse design and beyond

Peter R. Wiecha, Arnaud Arbouet · 2021

440 citations

Single-photon computational 3D imaging at 45  km

Zheng-Ping Li, Xin Huang · 2020

225 citations