journal article
Open Access
May 01, 2023
Cross-Border knowledge pipelines and innovation performance of chinese firms: evidence from Zhangjiang in Shanghai
Abstract
Abstract
It is increasingly emphasized that firms’ innovation depends on external knowledge interaction in the field of economic geography. Global knowledge linkages and interaction plays crucial role in gaining competitive advantage for firms in developing countries because of their immature innovation systems, inspiring a wide academic interest around cross-border knowledge pipelines. However, the existing literature has been silent about the type in which firms employ cross-border knowledge pipelines and neglects the potential importance of firm’s ownership in this process. Using 2015 survey micro-data of 4685 Chinese firms in Zhangjiang National Innovation Demonstration Zone, we investigate how different types of cross-border knowledge pipelines indicated by foreign R&D investment and returnees influence firm’s innovation. The research highlights the positive effects of foreign R&D investment and returnees on firms’ patent innovation, while returnees exerts negative influence on firms’ product innovation. Moreover, there exists a complementary relation between foreign R&D investment and returnees in facilitating firm’s patent innovation. State ownership negatively affects the relationship between foreign R&D investment and firms’ patent innovation.
It is increasingly emphasized that firms’ innovation depends on external knowledge interaction in the field of economic geography. Global knowledge linkages and interaction plays crucial role in gaining competitive advantage for firms in developing countries because of their immature innovation systems, inspiring a wide academic interest around cross-border knowledge pipelines. However, the existing literature has been silent about the type in which firms employ cross-border knowledge pipelines and neglects the potential importance of firm’s ownership in this process. Using 2015 survey micro-data of 4685 Chinese firms in Zhangjiang National Innovation Demonstration Zone, we investigate how different types of cross-border knowledge pipelines indicated by foreign R&D investment and returnees influence firm’s innovation. The research highlights the positive effects of foreign R&D investment and returnees on firms’ patent innovation, while returnees exerts negative influence on firms’ product innovation. Moreover, there exists a complementary relation between foreign R&D investment and returnees in facilitating firm’s patent innovation. State ownership negatively affects the relationship between foreign R&D investment and firms’ patent innovation.
Topics
No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →
References
75
[1]
Aarstad, J., Kvitastein, O., Jakobsen, S. 2016. Local buzz, global pipelines, or simply too much buzz? A critical study. Geoforum, 75: 129–133.
10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.07.009
[2]
Awate, S., Larsen, M. M., & Mudambi, R. 2015. Accessing vs. sourcing knowledge: A comparative study of R&D internationalisation between emerging and advanced economy enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1): 63–86.
10.1057/jibs.2014.46
[3]
Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28: 31–56.
10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
[4]
Bathelt, H., & Li, P. 2020. Processes of building cross-border knowledge pipelines. Research Policy, 49(3): 103928.
10.1016/j.respol.2020.103928
[5]
Bathelt, H., Cantwell, J. A., & Mudambi, R. 2018. Overcoming frictions in transnational knowledge flows: Challenges of connecting, sense-making and integrating. Journal of Economic Geography, 18(5), 1001–1022.
10.1093/jeg/lby047
[6]
Bruna, F., & Fernández-Sastre, J. 2021. Regional characteristics and the decision to innovate in a developing country: A multilevel analysis of Ecuadorian firms. Papers in Regional Science, 100(6): 1337–1354.
10.1111/pirs.12632
[7]
Cano-Kollmann, M., Cantwell, J., & Hannigan, T., Mudambi, R., & Song, J. 2016. Knowledge connectivity: An agenda for innovation research in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 47: 255–262.
10.1057/jibs.2016.8
[8]
Cantwell, J. 1989. Technological innovation and multinational corporations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
[9]
Cao, Z., Derudder, B., Dai, L., & Peng, Z. 2022. ‘Buzz-andpipeline’ dynamics in Chinese science: the impact of interurban collaboration linkages on cities’ innovation capacity, Regional Studies, 56(2): 290–306.
10.1080/00343404.2021.1906410
[10]
Cassiman, B., & Golovko, E. 2011. Innovation and Internationalization Through Exports. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(1):56–75.
10.1057/jibs.2010.36
[11]
When and How Does Business Group Affiliation Promote Firm Innovation? A Tale of Two Emerging Economies
Sea-Jin Chang, Chi-Nien Chung, Ishtiaq P. Mahmood
Organization Science
10.1287/orsc.1060.0202
[12]
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1989. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economy Journal, 99(8): 569–596.
10.2307/2233763
[13]
Crescenzi, R., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2017). The geography of innovation in China and India. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(6), 1010–1027.
10.1111/1468-2427.12554
[14]
Daniel, N., & Giuditta, D. 2015. “Technological complexity and economic development,” MPRA Paper 87738, University Library of Munich, Germany.
[15]
Espositoy, C., & Rigby, D. 2019. Buzz and pipelines: the costs and benefits of local and nonlocal interaction. Journal of Economic Geography, 19: 753–773.
10.1093/jeg/lby039
[16]
Fan, P. 2011. Innovation, globalization, and catch-up of latecomers: Cases of Chinese telecom firms. Environment and Planning A, 43(4): 830–849.
10.1068/a43152
[17]
Filatotchev, I., Liu, X., Lu, J., & Wright, M. 2011. Knowledge spillovers through human mobility across national borders: Evidence from Zhongguancun Science Park in China. Research Policy, 40(3): 453–462.
10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.003
[18]
Fitjar, R. D., & Huber, F. 2015. Global pipelines for innovation: Insights from the case of Norway. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(3), 561–583.
10.1093/jeg/lbu017
[19]
Fitjar, R. D., Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2011. When local interaction does not suffice: sources of firm innovation in urban Norway. Environment and Planning A, 43: 1248–1267.
10.1068/a43516
[20]
Fu, X., Fu, X. (maggie), Romero, C. C., & Pan, J. 2021. Exploring new opportunities through collaboration within and beyond sectoral systems of innovation in the fourth industrial revolution. Industrial and Corporate Change, 30(1): 233–249.
10.1093/icc/dtaa058
[21]
Fu, X., Li, Y., Li, J., & Chesbrough, H. 2021. When do latecomer firms undertake international open innovation: Evidence from China. Global Strategy Journal, 3: 1–26.
10.1002/gsj.1401
[22]
Fu, X., Woo, W. T., & Hou, J. 2016. Technological innovation policy in China: the lessons, and the necessary changes ahead. Economic Change and Restructuring, 49(2–3): 139–157.
10.1007/s10644-016-9186-x
[23]
Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. 2014. Combining knowledge from different sources, channels and geographical Scales, European Planning Studies, 22(11): 2305–2325.
10.1080/09654313.2013.835793
[24]
He, S., Lew, Y., Fallon, G., Kim, K., Khan, Z., Wei, P. 2017. Towards a new wave in internationalization of innovation? The rise of China’s innovative MNEs, strategic coupling, and global economic organization. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences Revue canadienne des sciences de l’administration, 34: 343–355.
10.1002/cjas.1444
[25]
Henn, S., & Bathelt, H. 2018. Cross-local knowledge fertilization, cluster emergence, and the generation of buzz. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(3): 449–466.
10.1093/icc/dtx036
[26]
Hennart, E. 2012. Emerging market multinationals and the theory of the multinational enterprise. Global Strategy Journal. 2: 168–187.
10.1111/j.2042-5805.2012.01038.x
[27]
Henry Wai-chung Yeung, H. 2009. Regional development and the competitive dynamics of global production networks: An East Asian Perspective, Regional Studies, 43(3): 325–351.
10.1080/00343400902777059
[28]
Hsu, C. W., Lien, Y. C., & Chen, H. 2015. R&D internationalisation and innovation performance. International Business Review, 24(2): 187–195.
10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.07.007
[29]
Jons, H. 2009. ‘Brain circulation’ and transnational knowledge networks: studying long-term effects of academic mobility to Germany, 1954–2000. Global Networks, 9(3): 315–338.
10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00256.x
[30]
Kim, H. E., & Pennings, J. M. 2009. Innovation and strategic renewal in mature markets: A study of the tennis racket industry. Organization Science, 20(2): 368–383.
10.1287/orsc.1080.0420
[31]
Kim, M., Lampert, C., & Roy, R. 2020. Regionalization of R&D activities: (Dis)economies of interdependence and inventive performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 51: 1054–1075.
10.1057/s41267-020-00314-0
[32]
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3: 383–397.
10.1287/orsc.3.3.383
[33]
Liefner, I., Kroll, H., Zeng, G., & Heindl, A. B. 2021. Regional innovation profiles: A comparative empirical study of four Chinese regions based on expert knowledge. Zeitschrift Fur Wirtschaftsgeographie, 65(3): 101–117.
10.1515/zfw-2020-0022
[34]
Liu, X., & Buck, T. 2007. Innovation performance and channels for international technology spillovers: Evidence from Chinese high-tech industries. Research Policy, 36(3): 355–366.
10.1016/j.respol.2006.12.003
[35]
Liu, X., Lu, J., & Choi, S. J. 2014. Bridging knowledge gaps: Returnees and reverse knowledge spillovers from Chinese local enterprises to foreign enterprises. Management International Review, 54(2): 253–276.
10.1007/s11575-013-0185-0
[36]
Liu, X., Lu, J., Filatotchev, I., Buck, T., & Wright, M. 2010. Returnee entrepreneurs, knowledge spillovers and innovation in high-tech firms in emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7): 1183–1197.
10.1057/jibs.2009.50
[37]
Lorenzen, M., & Mudambi, R. 2013. Clusters, connectivity and catch-up: Bollywood and bangalore in the global economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(3): 501–534.
10.1093/jeg/lbs017
[38]
Maskell, P., Bathelt, H., & Malmberg, A. 2006. Building global knowledge pipelines: The role of temporary clusters, European Planning Studies, 14(8): 997–1013.
10.1080/09654310600852332
[39]
Maskell, P., Bathelt, H., & Malmberg, A. 2006. Building global knowledge pipelines: The role of temporary clusters, European Planning Studies, 14(8): 997–1013.
10.1080/09654310600852332
[40]
Mathews, J. A. 2002. Competitive advantages of the latecomer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(4): 467–488.
10.1023/a:1020586223665
[41]
Meyer, K. E. 2018. Catch-up and leapfrogging: Emerging economy multinational firms on the global stage. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 25(1): 19–30.
10.1080/13571516.2017.1374624
[42]
Moodysson, J. 2008. Principles and practices of knowledge creation: On the organization of “Buzz” and “Pipelines” in life science communities. Economic Geography, 84(4): 449–469.
10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.00004.x
[43]
Mudambi, R., Swift, T. 2009. Professional guilds, tension and knowledge management. Research Policy, 38: 736–745.
10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.009
[44]
Narula, R. 2012. Do we need different frameworks to explain infant MNEs from developing countries? Global Strategy Journal, 2: 188–204.
10.1111/j.2042-5805.2012.01035.x
[45]
Pereira, V., Temouri, Y., Budhwar., & Tarba, S. 2021. Cross-border acquisition performance of emerging market multinational enterprises: The moderating role of state-ownership and acquisition experience. Long Range Planning, 54: 102–107.
10.1016/j.lrp.2021.102107
[46]
Perkmann, M. 2006. Extraregional linkages and the territorial embeddedness of multinational branch plants: Evidence from the South Tyrol region in Northeast Italy. Economic Geography. 82(4):421–441.
10.1111/j.1944-8287.2006.tb00324.x
[47]
Perri, A., & Santangelo, G. 2023. Close together or far apart? The geography of host-country knowledge sourcing and MNCs’ innovation performance, Regional Studies, 57:2, 370–383.
10.1080/00343404.2022.2084058
[48]
Rauch, J. E., & Trindade, V. 2002. Ethnic Chinese networks in international trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(4): 116–130.
10.1162/003465302317331955
[49]
Rialp-Criado, A., & Komochkova, K. 2017. Innovation strategy and export intensity of Chinese SMEs: The moderating role of the home-country business environment. Asian Business & Management, 16(3): 158–186.
10.1057/s41291-017-0018-2
[50]
Rutten, R. 2017. Beyond proximities: The socio-spatial dynamics of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 41(2): 159–177.
10.1177/0309132516629003
Showing 50 of 75 references
Metrics
4
Citations
75
References
Details
- Published
- May 01, 2023
- Vol/Issue
- 67(1)
- Pages
- 33-46
- License
- View
Authors
Cite This Article
Gang Zeng, Yu-Zhong Zhang, Xianzhong Cao (2023). Cross-Border knowledge pipelines and innovation performance of chinese firms: evidence from Zhangjiang in Shanghai. ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, 67(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw-2022-0004