AI and Business Models: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

Vania Sena; Manuela Nocker

doi:10.1561/0200000100

journal article May 03, 2021

AI and Business Models: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

Vania Sena Manuela Nocker

Foundations and Trends® in Technology, Information and Operations Management Vol. 14 No. 4 pp. 324-397 · Emerald

View at Publisher Save 10.1561/0200000100

Abstract

Over the last five years, several scholars from a range of disciplines have started to analyse how Artificial Intelligence (AI) affects businesses outcomes. This research effort has produced many predictions on the expected impact of automation on labour demand and equilibrium employment. However, most of the expected results are dependent on how businesses change their behaviour due to adopting AI. We argue that, as AI diffuses across the economy, changing behaviour is a necessary outcome for incumbents: the argument is that the diffusion of AI across an industry generates the conditions for a process of value migration from incumbents to new entrants (Helper et al., 2018); in these cases, the only mechanism available to incumbents to offset the negative impact of the migration process is by changing the architecture of their business, i.e., the business model. However, companies can choose from several AI-driven business models; their preference for one model is driven by many industry-level factors such as technical standards, the structure of the technology industry and the presence of an ethical framework for the use of AI. This monologue summarises the existing literature on business model innovation and AI; it then analyses the industry-level factors that may shape the business-level preference for specific business models. Finally, the monologue offers some suggestions for future research in the area.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

170

[1]

Abbott "International ‘standards’ and international governance" Journal of European Public Policy (2001) 10.1080/13501760110056013

[2]

Acemoglu (2011)

[3]

Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor

Daron Acemoglu, Pascual Restrepo

Journal of Economic Perspectives 2019 10.1257/jep.33.2.3

[4]

Achtenhagen "Dynamics of business models: Strategizing, critical capabilities and activities for sustained value creation" Long Range Planning (2013) 10.1016/j.lrp.2013.04.002

[5]

Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations

Ron Adner, Rahul Kapoor

Strategic Management Journal 2010 10.1002/smj.821

[6]

Aghion (2019)

[7]

Agrawal "What to expect from artificial intelligence" Sloan Management Review (2017)

[8]

Agrawal (2018)

[9]

AlphaGo|Deepmind (2019). url: https://deepmind.com/research/alphago/ (accessed on 15 May 2019).

[10]

American AI Initiative (2019)

[11]

Value creation in E‐business

Raphael Amit, Christoph Zott

Strategic Management Journal 2001 10.1002/smj.187

[12]

Amit "Creating value through business model innovation" MIT Sloan Management Review (2012)

[13]

Crafting Business Architecture: the Antecedents of Business Model Design

Raphael Amit, Christoph Zott

Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 2015 10.1002/sej.1200

[14]

Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation

Constantine Andriopoulos, Marianne W. Lewis

Organization Science 2009 10.1287/orsc.1080.0406

[15]

Antonescu "Are business leaders prepared to handle the upcoming revolution in business artificial intelligence?" Quality - Access to Success (2018)

[16]

Armstrong (2013)

[17]

Arntz (2016)

[18]

Baden-Fuller "Business models as models" Long Range Planning (2010) 10.1016/j.lrp.2010.02.005

[19]

Baumol "Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: The anatomy of urban crisis" American Economic Review (1967)

[20]

Bekkers "Emerging ways to address the re-emerging conflict between patenting and technological standardization" Industrial and Corporate Change (2012) 10.1093/icc/dtr067

[21]

Learning while (re)configuring: Business model innovation processes in established firms

Hans Berends, Armand Smits, Isabelle Reymen et al.

Strategic Organization 2016 10.1177/1476127016632758

[22]

Berger "Filing behaviour regarding essential patents in industry standards" Research Policy (2012) 10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.004

[23]

Berliner "Signaling environmental stewardship in the shadow of weak governance: The global diffusion of ISO 14001" Law and Society Review (2013) 10.1111/lasr.12015

[24]

Bessen (2018)

[25]

Birkinshaw "Building ambidexterity into an organization" MIT Sloan Management Review (2004)

[26]

Blind "Driving forces for standardisation at standardisation development organisations" Applied Economics (2002) 10.1080/00036840110111158

[27]

Blind (2004) 10.4337/9781035305155

[28]

Blind "Explanatory factors for participation in formal standardisation processes: Empirical evidence at firm level" Economics of Innovation and New Technology (2006) 10.1080/10438590500143970

[29]

Blind (2013)

[30]

Blind (2011)

[31]

Blind "Research and standardisation in nanotechnology: Evidence from Germany" Journal of Technology Transfer (2009) 10.1007/s10961-008-9089-8

[32]

Blind "The impact of standards and regulation on innovation in uncertain markets" Research Policy (2017) 10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.003

[33]

Blind "Interrelation between patenting and standardisation strategies: Empirical evidence and policy implications" Research Policy (2004) 10.1016/j.respol.2004.08.007

[34]

Boden AI: Its Nature and Future (2016)

[35]

Boitnott (2019)

[36]

Bojovic "Learning, signaling, and convincing: The role of experimentation in the business modelling process" Long Range Planning (2018) 10.1016/j.lrp.2017.09.001

[37]

Boston Consulting Group Business Model Innovation: When the Game Gets Tough, Change the Game (2019)

[38]

Bresnahan "General purpose technologies ‘Engines of growth’?" Journal of Econometrics (1995) 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01598-t

[39]

Brunsson (2000)

[40]

Brynjolfsson "Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance" The Journal of Economic Perspectives (2000) 10.1257/jep.14.4.23

[41]

Brynjolfsson (2014)

[42]

Brynjolfsson "What’s driving the machine learning explosion?" Harvard Business Review (2017)

[43]

Brynjolfsson "What can machines learn, and what does it mean for occupations and the economy?" AEA Papers and Proceedings (2018) 10.1257/pandp.20181019

[44]

Brynjolfsson (2017)

[45]

Bughin (2017)

[46]

Bughin (2017)

[47]

Büthe The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy (2011)

[48]

Calo (2017)

[49]

Casadesus-Masanell "From strategy to business models and onto tactics" Long Range Planning (2010) 10.1016/j.lrp.2010.01.004

[50]

Casadesus-Masanell "How to design a winning business model" Harvard Business Review (2011)

Showing 50 of 170 references

Metrics

8

Citations

170

References

Details

Published: May 03, 2021
Vol/Issue: 14(4)
Pages: 324-397

Authors

V

Vania Sena

University of Sheffield

M

Manuela Nocker

University of Essex Essex Business School,

Cite This Article

Vania Sena, Manuela Nocker (2021). AI and Business Models: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly. Foundations and Trends® in Technology, Information and Operations Management, 14(4), 324-397. https://doi.org/10.1561/0200000100

AI and Business Models: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

You May Also Like