journal article Nov 09, 2016

Spatial Econometrics: A Broad View

View at Publisher Save 10.1561/0800000030
Abstract
Spatial econometrics can be defined in a narrow and in a broader sense. In a narrow sense it refers to methods and techniques for the analysis of regression models using data observed within discrete portions of space such as countries or regions. In a broader sense it is inclusive of the models and theoretical instruments of spatial statistics and spatial data analysis to analyze various economic effects such as externalities, interactions, spatial concentration and many others. Indeed, the reference methodology for spatial econometrics lies on the advances in spatial statistics where it is customary to distinguish between different typologies of data that can be encountered in empirical cases and that require different modelling strategies. A first distinction is between continuous spatial data and data observed on a discrete space. Continuous spatial data are very common in many scientific disciplines (such as physics and environmental sciences), but are still not currently considered in the spatial econometrics literature. Discrete spatial data can take the form of points, lines and polygons. Point data refer to the position of the single economic agent observed at an individual level. Lines in space take the form of interactions between two spatial locations such as flows of goods, individuals and information. Finally data observed within polygons can take the form of predefined irregular portions of space, usually administrative partitions such as countries, regions or counties within one country.
In this monograph we will adopt a broader view of spatial econometrics and we will introduce some of the basic concepts and the fundamental distinctions needed to properly analyze economic datasets observed as points, regions or lines over space. It cannot be overlooked the fact that the mainstream spatial econometric literature was recently the subject for harsh and radical criticisms by a number of papers. The purpose of this monograph is to show that much of these criticisms are in fact well grounded, but that they lose relevance if we abandon the narrow paradigm of a discipline centered on the regression analysis of regional data, and we embrace the wider acceptation adopted here. In Section 2 we will introduce methods for the spatial econometric analysis of regional data that, so far, have been the workhorse of most theoretical and empirical work in the literature. We will consider modelling strategies falling within the general structure of the SARAR paradigm and its particularizations by presenting the various estimation and hypothesis testing procedures based on Maximum Likelihood (ML), Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) and Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS), that were proposed in the literature to remove the ineffieciencies and inconsistencies arising from the presence of various forms of spatial dependence. Section 3 is devoted to the new emerging field of spatial econometric analysis of individual granular spatial data sometimes referred to as spatial microeconometrics. We present modelling strategies that use information about the actual position of each economic agent to explain both individuals’ location decisions and the economic actions observed in the chosen locations. We will discuss the peculiarities of general spatial autoregressive model in this setting and the use of models where distances are used as predictors in a regression framework. We will also present some point pattern methods to model individuals’ locational choices, as well as phenomena of co-localization and joint-localization. Finally in Section 4 the general SARAR paradigm is applied to the case of spatial interaction models estimated using data in the form of origin–destination variables and specified following models based on the analogy with the Newtonian law of universal gravitation. The discussion in this monograph is intentionally limited to the analysis of spatial data observed in a single moment of time leaving out of presentation the case of dynamic spatial data such as those observed in spatial panel data.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
232
[1]
Amemiya "Regression analysis when the dependent variable is truncated normal" Econometrica (1973) 10.2307/1914031
[2]
Amemiya (1985)
[3]
Anderson (2003)
[4]
Andersson "Spatial dependence and the representation of space in empirical models" Annals of Regional Sciences (2009) 10.1007/s00168-008-0211-5
[5]
Anselin (1988) 10.1007/978-94-015-7799-1
[6]
Anselin "Under the hood: Issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models" Agricultural Economics (2002) 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2002.tb00120.x
[7]
Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence

Luc Anselin, Anil K. Bera, Raymond Florax et al.

Regional Science and Urban Economics 1996 10.1016/0166-0462(95)02111-6
[8]
[9]
Arbia "Modelling the geography of economic activities on a continuous space" Papers in Regional Sciences (2001) 10.1111/j.1435-5597.2001.tb01211.x
[10]
Arbia (2006)
[11]
Arbia "A lustrum of SEA: Recent trends following the creation of the spatial econometrics association (2007-2011)" Spatial Economic Analysis (2011) 10.1080/17421772.2011.610901
[12]
Arbia (2014)
[13]
Arbia "Pairwise likelihood inference for spatial regressions estimated on very large datasets" Spatial Statistics (2014) 10.1016/j.spasta.2013.10.001
[14]
Arbia (2017)
[15]
Arbia (1996)
[16]
Arbia "Exploring non linear dependence in the tails of bivariate marginals of a random field" Geographical Analysis (2005) 10.1111/j.0016-7363.2005.03704003.x
[17]
Arbia "Spatial econometrics modelling of regional convergence in continuous time" International Regional Science Review (2003) 10.1177/0160017603255974
[18]
Arbia (2016)
[19]
Arbia "Effects of MAUP on spatial econometrics models" Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences (2011) 10.1007/s12076-011-0065-9
[20]
Arbia "Effects of scale in spatial interaction models" Journal of Geographical Systems (2013) 10.1007/s10109-013-0180-9
[21]
Arbia "A class of spatial econometric methods in the empirical analysis of clusters of firms in the space" Empirical Economics (2008) 10.1007/s00181-007-0154-1
[22]
Arbia "Detecting the existence of space-time clusters of firms" Regional Science and Urban Economics (2010) 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2009.10.004
[23]
Arbia "Testing isotropy in spatial econometric models" Spatial Economic Analysis (2013) 10.1080/17421772.2013.804629
[24]
Arbia (2015)
[25]
Arbia "A micro spatial analysis of firm demography: The case of food stores in the area of trento (italy)" Empirical Economics (2015) 10.1007/s00181-014-0834-6
[26]
Arbia "Dirty spatial econometrics" The Annals of Regional Science (2015) 10.1007/s00168-015-0726-5
[27]
Arbia "Measurement errors arising when using distances in spatial microeconometric modelling and the individuals’ position is geo-masked for confidentiality" Econometrics (2015) 10.3390/econometrics3040709
[28]
Arbia (2016)
[29]
Autant-Bernard "Quantifying knowledge spillovers using spatial econometric models" Journal of Regional Science (2011) 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00705.x
[30]
Baddeley "Non- and semi-parametric estimation of interaction in inhomogeneous point patterns" Statistica Nederlandica (2000) 10.1111/1467-9574.00144
[31]
Bailey (1995)
[32]
Baltagi "Estimation of structural gravity quantile regression models" Empirical Economics (2015) 10.1007/s00181-015-0956-5
[33]
Banerjee
[34]
Barker (1989)
[35]
Behrens "‘Dual’ gravity: Using spatial econometrics to control for multilateral resistance" Journal of Applied Econometrics (2012) 10.1002/jae.1231
[36]
Bell "Applying the generalized-moments estimation approach to spatial problems involving microlevel data" Review of Economics and Statistics (2000) 10.1162/003465300558641
[37]
Bennett "The problem of missing data on spatial surfaces" Annals of the Association of American Geographers (1984) 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1984.tb01440.x
[38]
Berglund "Identifying local spatial association in flow data" Journal of Geographical Systems (1999) 10.1007/s101090050013
[39]
Berman "Approximating point process likelihoods with GLIM" Applied Statistics (1992) 10.2307/2347614
[40]
Bernardini "Generalized maximum entropy estimation of spatial panel interaction models" WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics (2010)
[41]
[42]
Spatial Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of Lattice Systems

Julian Besag

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B:... 1974 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00999.x
[43]
Besag "Contribution to the discussion of dr. ripley’s paper" Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B (1977)
[44]
Besag "Simple monte carlo tests for spatial pattern" Applied Statistics (1977) 10.2307/2346974
[45]
Black "Network autocorrelation in transport network and flow systems" Geographical Analysis (1992) 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00262.x
[46]
Black "Accidents on belgium’s motorways: A network autocorrelation analysis" Journal of Transport Geography (1998) 10.1016/s0966-6923(97)00037-9
[47]
Blume (2010)
[48]
Bolduc "Spatial autoregressive error components in travel flow models" Regional Science and Urban Economics (1992) 10.1016/0166-0462(92)90035-y
[49]
Boots (1988)
[50]
Burridge "On the cliff-ord test for spatial correlation" Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B (1980) 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1980.tb01108.x

Showing 50 of 232 references

Metrics
17
Citations
232
References
Details
Published
Nov 09, 2016
Vol/Issue
8(3-4)
Pages
145-265
Cite This Article
Giuseppe Arbia (2016). Spatial Econometrics: A Broad View. Foundations and Trends® in Econometrics, 8(3-4), 145-265. https://doi.org/10.1561/0800000030