journal article Sep 08, 2020

Sense and Nonsense in ESG Ratings

View at Publisher Save 10.1561/108.00000049
Abstract
Concerns about the future of the natural environment, prevailing social conditions, and governance of private and public institutions inspire today’s ESG movement. This paper proposes a heuristic that can be useful in examining the ESG-scoring issue. We begin with a social control diagnostic covering business activities – one that addresses the interests and actions of various stakeholders in the system. We examine its dynamics in the context of economic, social, and political pressures, including various initiatives to set standards against which business conduct may be calibrated. We evaluate efforts to create metrics that reflect normative improvements in ESG outcomes and performance scoring against them. We assess the industrial organization of the ESG ratings industry and review key empirical studies of ESG-driven investing. We conclude with policy recommendations intended to alleviate existing shortcomings in ESG ratings and improve their role in capital allocation and corporate governance.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
19
[1]
Baum (2019)
[2]
Berg (2019)
[3]
Black (2017)
[4]
Bradford, H. 2020. “ESG data market poised to hit $1 billion in 2021”. Report, March 2020. Available at: url: https://www.pionline.com/esg/esg-data-market-poised-hit-1-billion-2021-report.1
[5]
Cornell "The ESG concept has been overhyped and oversold”" (2020)
[6]
Doyle, T. M. 2018. “Ratings that don’t rate: The subjective world of ESG rating agencies”. American Council for Capital Formation, July2018. Available at: url: https://accfcorpgov.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/ACCF_RatingsESGReport.pdf.
[7]
Dunn "Assessing risk through environmental, social and governance exposures" Journal of Investment Management (2018)
[8]
ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies

Gunnar Friede, Timo Busch, Alexander Bassen

Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 2015 10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
[9]
Garvey (2016)
[10]
Goodman (2020)
[11]
Huber (2017)
[12]
Karp, E. 2019. “Investors, fasten your seat belts”. Cornerstone Capital, July2019. Available at: url: https://www.corporatesecretary.com/articles/esg/31461/considering-esg-materiality-part-fiduciary-duty-says-cornerstone-capital-ceo/?utm_source=CS141218%5C&utm_medium=email%5C& utm_campaign=esg_forum.
[13]
Khan "Corporate governance, ESG, and stock returns around the world”" Financial Analysts Journal (2019) 10.1080/0015198x.2019.1654299
[14]
Kim, S. and A.Yoon. 2020. “Analyzing active managers’ commitment to ESG: Evidence from United Nations principles for responsible investment” . url: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3555984. 10.2139/ssrn.3555984
[15]
Kotsantonis "Four things no one will tell you about ESG data" Journal of Applied Corporate Finance (2019) 10.1111/jacf.12346
[16]
Lipsey "The general theory of second best”" Review of Economic Studies (1956) 10.2307/2296233
[17]
Polk, D. 2020. “ESG disclosure frameworks – Recent updates”. Client Memorandum. July15, 2020. Available at: url: https://ft.com/content/719e6253-4d07-403a-9f36-d461671657a1.
[18]
Serafeim, G. and A.Sikochi. 2019. Why is corporate virtue in the eye of the beholder? The case of ESG ratings. November2019. Available at: url: http://www.israeli-corporate-governance.org/files/content/banner/Sikochi_ESGRatings.pdf.
[19]
Cited By
25
Sustainability Accounting, Manageme...
Metrics
25
Citations
19
References
Details
Published
Sep 08, 2020
Vol/Issue
5(2)
Pages
307-336
Cite This Article
Ingo Walter (2020). Sense and Nonsense in ESG Ratings. Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting, 5(2), 307-336. https://doi.org/10.1561/108.00000049
Related

You May Also Like

Auditor Lobbying on Accounting Standards

Abigail Allen, Karthik Ramanna · 2018

15 citations

Consequences of More Frequent Reporting: The U.K. Experience

Suresh Nallareddy, Robert Pozen · 2021

12 citations