Early Career Researchers as Stakeholders in University Decision‐Making in Europe: Comparative Perspectives

Liudvika Leišytė; Ivana Načinović Braje; Shulamit Almog; Sultan Baysan; Teresa Carvalho; Dovilė Daunoraitė; Sara Diogo; Panourgias Papaioannou; Anna Farmaki; Shlomit Feldman; Rakibe Külcür; Inga Matijošytė; Sandra Pralgauskaitė; Vanya Rangelova; Dalia Šatkovskienė

doi:10.17645/si.9683

journal article Open Access Jan 01, 2026

Early Career Researchers as Stakeholders in University Decision‐Making in Europe: Comparative Perspectives

Liudvika Leišytė

Ivana Načinović Braje Shulamit Almog Sultan Baysan

Teresa Carvalho Dovilė Daunoraitė Sara Diogo Panourgias Papaioannou Anna Farmaki

Shlomit Feldman Rakibe Külcür Inga Matijošytė Sandra Pralgauskaitė Vanya Rangelova Dalia Šatkovskienė

Social Inclusion Vol. 14 · Cogitatio

View at Publisher Save 10.17645/si.9683

Abstract

The voices of academics have traditionally been strong in university decision‐making bodies, where they participated in the shared governance of the university. It has been customary for senior academics to be represented in managing bodies and to exercise control over the key areas of strategy, finance, quality assurance, study programs, and/or human resources. With the new public management reforms that have swept through higher education (HE) systems, the power of academics has been reduced, while managerial guidance has increased, alongside the fostering of universities’ institutional autonomy. At the same time, the power of other stakeholders, such as students or industry representatives, has also been increasing as part and parcel of the governance reforms, albeit to different degrees and at different paces across various HE systems. In this context, this article seeks to examine the role that early career researchers (ECRs) play in university decision‐making bodies across different countries as internal stakeholders. The research is based on seven case studies from seven European and East Mediterranean countries drawing on documentary data and 55 semi‐structured interviews with ECRs and 14 managers, carried out in 2023–2024. Following stakeholder categories distinguished on the basis of their legitimacy, urgency, and power, this <span class="fontstyle0">article investigates the extent to which ECRs perceive their voices to be heard. The findings show variance between the case studies regarding formal representation, with most universities in the study having limited representation of ECRs in university and faculty/school‐level decision‐making bodies. The voices of ECRs, however, are heard in informal ways.</span>

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

90

[1]

Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464. 10.1177/0891243206289499

[2]

Addison, M., Breeze, M., & Taylor, Y. (2022). The Palgrave handbook of imposter syndrome in higher education. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978-3-030-86570-2

[3]

Amaral, A., & Magalhaes, A. (2002). The emergent role of external stakeholders in European higher education governance. In A. Amaral, G. A. Jones, & B. Karseth (Eds.), Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance (Vol. 2, pp. 1–21). Springer. 10.1007/978-94-015-9946-7_1

[4]

Completing the Three Stages of Doctoral Education: An Event History Analysis

Frim D. Ampaw, Audrey J. Jaeger

Research in Higher Education 10.1007/s11162-011-9250-3

[5]

Antonowicz, D., & Jones, G. A. (2024). The role of university governing boards in Canadian higher education: Sociological perspectives on the form and functioning of boards. Routledge.

[6]

Archer, L. (2021). Diversity, equality and inclusion in research and innovation: Reflecting on the McMaster-Lancet Commission. The Lancet, 398(10295), 211–213.

[7]

Austin, I., & Jones, G. A. (2025). Governance of higher education: Global perspectives, theories, and practices. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003283652

[8]

Bailyn, L. (2011). Redesigning work for gender equity and work-personal life integration. Community, Work & Family, 14(1), 97–112. 10.1080/13668803.2010.532660

[9]

Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories. McGraw-Hill Education.

[10]

Białas, S. (2009). Power distance as a determinant of relations between managers and employees in the enterprises with foreign capital. Journal of Intercultural Management, 1, 105–115.

[11]

Biron, C., Brun, J.-P., & Ivers, H. (2008). Extent and sources of occupational stress in university staff. Work, 30, 511–522. 10.3233/wor-2008-00678

[12]

Blackmore, P., & Kandiko, C. (2011). Research leaders: What do they need to know? International Journal for Researcher Development, 2(1), 24–34.

[13]

Bleiklie, I., Enders, J., & Lepori, B. (2017). Managing universities: Policy and organizational change from a Western European comparative perspective. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-53865-5

[14]

‘A one-sided view of the world’: women of colour at the intersections of academic freedom

Mwenza Blell, Shan-Jan Sarah Liu, Audrey Verma

The International Journal of Human Rights 10.1080/13642987.2022.2041601

[15]

Bonello, K., & Wånggren, L. (2023). Working conditions in a marketised university system: Generation precarity. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978-3-031-42655-1

[16]

Brami, M., Diprose, R., & Thomas, L. (2023). Improving the workplace rights and support for early career researchers: A cross-institutional analysis. Research Policy, 52(4), Article 104356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104356

[17]

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

[18]

Byrom, N. C., & Lightfoot, N. J. (2013). Developing early career researchers’ toolkit: Being a successful doctoral student. International Journal for Researcher Development, 4(2), 77–92.

[19]

Carvalho, T., & Videira, P. (2019). Losing autonomy? Restructuring higher education institutions’ governance and relations between teaching and non-teaching staff. Studies in Higher Education, 44(4), 762–773. 10.1080/03075079.2017.1401059

[20]

Carvalho, T., Diogo, S., & Vilhena, B. (2022). Invisible researchers in the knowledge society—The Uberisation of scientific work in Portugal. European Journal of Higher Education, 12(4), 393–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2022.2105371 10.1080/21568235.2022.2105371

[21]

Why do students consider dropping out of doctoral degrees? Institutional and personal factors

Montserrat Castelló, Marta Pardo, Anna Sala-Bubaré et al.

Higher Education 10.1007/s10734-016-0106-9

[22]

Cureton, D. (2023). Imposter phenomenon and the early career researcher. In HEPI & The British Academy (Eds.), The lives of early career researchers—HEPI Report 169 (pp. 58–62). HEPI; The British Academy.

[23]

De Boer, H., Enders J., & Schimank U. (2008). Comparing higher education governance systems in four European countries. In N. C. Soguel & P. Jaccard (Eds.), Governance and performance of education systems (pp. 35–54). Springer. 10.1007/978-1-4020-6446-3_3

[24]

Della Torre, E., Gritti, A., & Wilkinson, A. (2022, March 23). Employee voice: Meanings, approaches, and research directions. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. https://oxfordre.com/business/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.001.0001/acrefore-9780190224851-e-326 10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.326

[25]

Eurodoc. (2020). Survey on the working conditions of early career researchers in Europe.

[26]

Finkelstein, M. J., & Jones, G. A. (2019). Professorial pathways: Academic careers in a global perspective. Johns Hopkins University Press. 10.1353/book.66182

[27]

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

[28]

Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/cbo9781139192675

[29]

Grundy, D. (2023). Demystifying funding applications. In HEPI & The British Academy (Eds.), The lives of early career researchers—HEPI Report 169 (pp. 43–46). HEPI; The British Academy.

[30]

Gustafsson, K. M., Díaz-Reviriego, I., & Turnhout, E. (2020). Building capacity for the science-policy interface on biodiversity and ecosystem services: Activities, fellows, outcomes, and neglected capacity building needs. Earth System Governance, 4(2), Article 100050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2020.100050 10.1016/j.esg.2020.100050

[31]

Guthrie, S., Lichten, C., van Belle, J., Ball, S., Knack, A., & Hofman, J. (2017). Understanding mental health in the research environment: A rapid evidence assessment (Research Report). The Royal Society; RAND Europe. 10.7249/rr2022

[32]

Haider, L. J., Hentati-Sundberg, J., Giusti, M., Goodness, J., Hamann, M., Masterson, V. A., Meacham, M., Merrie, A., Ospina, D., Schill, C., & Sinare, H. (2018). The undisciplinary journey: Early-career perspectives in sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 13(1), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0445-1 10.1007/s11625-017-0445-1

[33]

Hancock, S., Clegg, S., Crossouard, B., Kahn, P., & Weller, S. (2013). Preparing for the REF 2014: Insider accounts from the social sciences. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 112(4), 822–834.

[34]

Hemmings, B. C., & Kay, R. (2016). The relationship between research self-efficacy, research disposition, and publication output. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 347–361. 10.1080/01443410.2015.1025704

[35]

Hendin, A. (2023). Separate but equal? Diversity policy narratives in Israeli higher education. Higher Education Policy, 36(4), 826–846. 10.1057/s41307-022-00291-z

[36]

Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139. 10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125::aid-smj150>3.0.co;2-h

[37]

Hofstede, G. J. (2015). Culture’s causes: The next challenge. Cross Cultural Management, 22(4), 545–569. 10.1108/ccm-03-2015-0040

[38]

Howe-Walsh, L., & Turnock, S. (2016). Who am I? Experiences of early career researchers in the UK. Education + Training, 58(4), 392–408.

[39]

Iyengar, R., Levesque, M., & Crossman, A. (2020). Work-life balance among Ph.D. students: Challenges and support. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 11(1), 33–55.

[40]

The pandemic and changes in early career researchers’ career prospects, research and publishing practices

Hamid R. Jamali, David Nicholas, David Sims et al.

PLoS ONE 10.1371/journal.pone.0281058

[41]

Johnson, A. (2019). Increasing the representation of early career researchers in university governance. Higher Education Quarterly, 73(2), 245–255.

[42]

Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56, 303–324. 10.1007/s10734-008-9128-2

[43]

Kaatz, A., Gutierrez, B., & Carnes, M. (2016). Threats to objectivity in peer review: The case of gender. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 38(5), 371–373. 10.1016/j.tips.2014.06.005

[44]

Kent, B. A., Holman, C., Amoako, E., Antonietti, A., Azam, J. M., Ballhausen, H., Bediako, Y., Belasen, A. M., Carneiro, C. F. D., Chen, Y.-C., Compeer, E. B., Connor, C. A. C., Crüwell. S., Debat, H., Dorris, E., Ebrahimi, H., Erlich, J. C., Fernández-Chiappe, F., Fischer, F., . . . Weissgerber, T. L. (2022). Recommendations for empowering early career researchers to improve research culture and practice. PLoS Biology, 20(7), Article 3001680. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001680 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001680

[45]

Klemenčič, M. (2012). The changing conceptions of student participation in HE governance in the EHEA. In A. Curaj, P. Scott, L. Vlasceanu, & L. Wilson (Eds.), European higher education at the crossroads (pp. 631–653). Springer. 10.1007/978-94-007-3937-6_34

[46]

Külcür, R., Bonello, K., Brown, M., Baysan, S., Demir, T., Patón-Romero, J. D., Novelskaitė, A., Grinevica, L., & Showunmi, V. (2024). Voices in academia and beyond: An exploration of European researchers’ narratives using a decolonising lens. Postcolonial Directions in Education, 13(1), 1–54.

[47]

Laudel, G., & Gläser, J. (2008). From apprentice to colleague: The metamorphosis of early career researchers. Higher Education, 55(3), 387–406. 10.1007/s10734-007-9063-7

[48]

Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702. 10.1177/0306312705052359

[49]

Leišytė, L. (2024, March 19). Early career academics’ inclusion in decision-making: Initial findings [Guest presentation]. Kites Guest Talk—Monthly Research Seminar, University of Twente, The Netherlands.

[50]

Leišytė, L., Pekşen, S., Rose, A.-L., & Želvys, R. (2022). The teaching-research nexus in Lithuanian higher education compared to other European higher education systems. In F. Huang, T. Aarrevaara, & U. Teichler (Eds.), Teaching and research in the knowledge-based society: Historical and comparative perspectives (pp. 137–160). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-031-04439-7_8

Showing 50 of 90 references

Metrics

2

Citations

90

References

Details

Published: Jan 01, 2026
Vol/Issue: 14
License: View

Authors

L

Liudvika Leišytė

I

Ivana Načinović Braje

Panourgias Papaioannou

Cite This Article

Liudvika Leišytė, Ivana Načinović Braje, Shulamit Almog, et al. (2026). Early Career Researchers as Stakeholders in University Decision‐Making in Europe: Comparative Perspectives. Social Inclusion, 14. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.9683

Early Career Researchers as Stakeholders in University Decision‐Making in Europe: Comparative Perspectives

You May Also Like