journal article Jun 15, 2020

Cephalometric evaluation of airway dimensions in subjects with different sagittal and vertical variables

View at Publisher Save 10.18231/j.ijodr.2020.019
Abstract
The pharynx is a tube shaped structure that extends superoinferiorly from the cranial base to the level of the inferior surface of the sixth cervical vertebra. A nasal breather may change to a mouth breather because of an obstruction in the nasal or pharyngeal airway. In addition, pharyngeal narrowing is a commonly described characteristic in obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) patients. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the upper and lower airway dimensions are affected by the sagittal and vertical skeletal variables. The pre-treatment lateral cephalograms of 140 patients aged between 16years to 26 years were traced for the study. For each subject angular and linear cephalometric parameters were measured. Continuous variables were compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the significance of mean difference between the groups was done by Tukey’s post hoc test. A two-sided (α = 2) P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. in this study, we found a significant difference among Class I subjects with three different vertical growth pattern. Hyperdivergent patients had statistically significant narrower upper and lower pharyngeal width when compared to normodivergent and hypodivergent growth patterns. Patients with Class II malocclusions have significantly narrower upper and lower pharyngeal airways than those with Class I and Class III malocclusions.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
9
[1]
Hiatt J L, Gartner L P, Textbook of Head and Neck Anatomy. ;1982:48-56
[2]
Hoekema A., Hovinga B., Stegenga B., Bont L. G. M. De, Craniofacial morphology and obstructive sleep apnoea: a cephalometric analysis.J Oral Rehabil 2003;30(7):690-6 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01130.x
[3]
Sheng C M, Lin L H, Su Y, Tsai H H, Developmental changes in pharyngeal airway depth and hyoid bone position from childhood to young adulthood.Angle Orthod 2009;79:484-490 10.2319/062308-328.1
[4]
Malkoc Siddik, Usumez Serdar, Nur Metin, Donaghy Claire E., Reproducibility of airway dimensions and tongue and hyoid positions on lateral cephalograms.Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2005;128(4):513-6 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.05.001
[5]
Zhong Z, Tang Z, Gao X, Zeng X L, A comparison study of upper airway among different skeletal craniofacial patterns in nonsnoring Chinese children.Angle Orthod 2010;80:267-74 10.2319/030809-130.1
[6]
Aboudara Cameron, Nielsen Ib, Huang John C., Maki Koutaro, Miller Arthur J., Hatcher David, Comparison of airway space with conventional lateral headfilms and 3-dimensional reconstruction from cone-beam computed tomography.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135(4):468-79 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.04.043
[7]
Ceylan İsmail, Oktay Hüsamettin, A study on the pharyngeal size in different skeletal patterns.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108(1):69-75 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70068-4
[8]
Kerr W J, The nasopharynx, face height, and overbite.Angle Orthod 1985;55:31-6
[9]
Ucar Faruk Izzet, Uysal Tancan, Orofacial airway dimensions in subjects with Class I malocclusion and different growth patterns.Angle Orthod 2011;81(3):460-468 10.2319/091910-545.1
Metrics
1
Citations
9
References
Details
Published
Jun 15, 2020
Vol/Issue
6(2)
Pages
86-89
Cite This Article
Anjali Jaiswal, Ashish Gupta, Gaurav Sharma, et al. (2020). Cephalometric evaluation of airway dimensions in subjects with different sagittal and vertical variables. IP Indian Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research, 6(2), 86-89. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijodr.2020.019
Related

You May Also Like