journal article Jan 01, 2024

Generative AI and the Future of Work: Augmentation or Automation?

View at Publisher Save 10.2139/ssrn.4811728
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
65
[1]
Consistent with the theme of this article, the initial draft, revised and rewritten by Nitzberg and Zysman, was generated by
[2]
John Zysman Developing Healthy Communities in an Era of Intelligent Tools, Innovation Policy Lab Working Paper Series 2019-01
[3]
Set aside the differing definitions and analytics of the notion of productivity and simply note that it highlights the link between the inputs into the productive economy and its outputs as measured (2025)
[4]
J Zysman Beyond Hype and Despair: Developing Healthy Communities in the Era of Intelligent Tools (2019)
[5]
Defined by Perplexity, itself a GenAI tool (2024)
[6]
M Kenney "Understanding Work in the Online Platform Economy: The Narrow, the Broad, and the Systemic Perspectives" Berkeley Round Table on the International Economy (2016)
[7]
Laura D Tyson & John Zysman Journal of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences (2022)
[8]
J Zysman Beyond Hype and Despair: Developing Healthy Communities in the Era of Intelligent Tools (2019)
[9]
P A David "a point hammered in the literature on the example of the Qwerty keyboard for typing; it is not only the answer that becomes embedded but a solution" Politics & Society (1978)
[10]
/ Zysman (2024)
[11]
winter is, as reported by Wikipedia, a period of reduced funding and interest in AI research. There have been several doubt times between the hype times. -Wikipedia has an article on them
[12]
Laura Tyson and I have presented our views on this. The article notes those on whose work we drew. Tyson & Zysman, Automation, AI & Work. Much of the discussion here, including the language in some cases
[13]
Laura D Tyson "Automation, AI & Work" Daedalus (2022) 10.1162/daed_a_01914
[14]
S Albanesi Reports of AI Ending Human Labour May Be Greatly Exaggerated (2023)
[15]
F Butolo "Butolo argued that ever finer and more sophisticated divisions of labor balance the labor markets and drive demand for workers, shifting the required skills" The Rebound Effects of Automation, Weizenbaum Series #27 (2020)
[16]
Tyson & Zysman Understanding the Impact of Automation on Workers, Jobs, and Wages, Brookings Institution (2022)
[17]
P Acemoglu Tasks%20Automation%20and%20the%20Rise%20in%20US%20Wage%20Inequality.pdf; D. Acemoglu & P. Restrepo, Unpacking Skill Bias: Automation and New Tasks (2020)
[18]
While RBTC had driven market forces of inequality, the extreme inequality that sets apart the .1% from the 1% and indeed the .01% from the 1% is a product of tax policy and financial market regulations
[19]
D Acemoglu "Eclipse of Rent-Sharing: The Effects of Managers' Business Education on Wages and the Labor Share in the US and Denmark" National Bureau of Economic Research (2022)
[20]
T Pardi "Digital Manufacturing Revolutions as Political Projects and Hypes: Evidences from the Auto Sector, International Labour Organization" Developing supplier capabilities: Market and non-market approaches (2004)
[21]
Checkout-Free Grabango Note that Grabango's approach is quite distinct from Amazon's now abandoned technology
[22]
/ Zysman (2006)
[23]
J Zysman The Third Globalization: Can Wealthy Nations Stay Rich in the Twenty-First Century? (2013) 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199917822.003.0006
[24]
M Kenney "The Rise of the Platform Economy" Issues in Science and Technology (2016)
[25]
D Bearson "Measuring the impacts of labor in the platform economy: new work created, old work reorganized, and value creation reconfigured" Industrial and Corporate Change (2020) 10.1093/icc/dtaa046
[26]
M Keutel "Future of Retail Operations: Winning in a Digital Era" McKinsey & Company (2020)
[27]
C B Frey The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation? Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Work (2013)
[28]
Nor do they consider that apart from the financial costs, these indeed, these tools may be adopted to address labor power. All too often part of the objective of introducing automation is eliminating workers to limit political or union pressures from the union movement
[29]
There are several relevant articles: Why Economists Are at War over Inequality (2023, November), retrieved from (2023)
[30]
H Varian Automation versus procreation (aka bots versus tots (2020)
[31]
Butollo The Rebound Effects of Automation
[32]
B Marr mind-blowing-stats-everyone-should-read/ 30 Many of Alison Gopnik's works support this argument (2018)
[33]
We distinguish existential threats into two categories: Threats generated by the systems acting with, or acting as if they have, actual intent: Systems where a mistaken instruction sets off a debacle
[34]
J Zysman "This discussion of machine learning based AI draws from, quotes, and rephrases two articles by Mark Nitzberg and John Zysman" Journal of European Public Policy (2021)
[35]
J Zysman "The winter was a period where the general public and the sponsors like, DARPA, saw that the paths being followed at the time were not likely to yield results. Knowledge representation systems, expert systems" ?abstract_id=3681088 33 Most estimates of the AI winter (1985)
[36]
D Mumford Consciousness, Robots, and DNA, forthcoming in Proceedings of the First International Congress of Basic Science (2023)
[37]
A Krizhevsky "Imagenet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks" Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2012)
[38]
In the case of deep reinforcement learning, systems are trained by programming an exploration of the relevant world, such as making legal moves on a chessboard, where a scoring mechanism called a reward function gives a rating of proximity to a desired outcome
[39]
J Varian Why Most Companies Are Failing at Artificial Intelligence: Eye on A.I (2019)
[40]
A Vaswani "Attention Is All You Need" Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2017)
[41]
L Berglund "The Reversal Curse: LLMs Trained on "A Is B" Fail to Learn "B Is A" Proceedings of ICLR 2024 (2024)
[42]
"Training and curating have overlapping meanings: choosing training data, sometimes analyzing the data and pruning out the unwanted stuff. Training requires data. Selecting the data to use for training may be considered part of the whole training process but for the computer programmer, training data is just assumed to be a given. Teaching folks to code is no longer enough. Programmers must understand statistics and experimental design. Hence, "data science" vs" computer science Zysman/Nitzberg (2024)
[43]
John Haltiwanger "Erik Brynjolfsson and Laura Tyson have provided an excellent overview of the productivity and deployment problem: Laura Tyson and Erik Brynjolfsson (co-chairs" NASEM Committee on AI and the Workforce Productivity Effects of AI
[44]
D Andrews The Best versus the Rest; The Global Productivity Slowdown, Divergence across Firms and the Role of Public Policy (2016)
[45]
Op The Rebound Effects of Automation
[46]
; S Certainly we could test that proposition by carefully calculating tasks in era 1 and setting them against the realities that emerged. That though seems a good deal of work to demonstrate what would seem to be evident. The worlds of work that emerged were not logical extensions of their predecessors (2019)
[47]
J Manyika public%20and%20social%20sector/our%20insights/wha t%20the%20future%20of%20work%20will%20mean%20for%20jobs%20skills%20and%20wages/mgi-jobs-lost-jobsgained-executive-summary (2017)
[48]
S Berger How We Compete: What Companies Around the World Are Doing to Make It in Today's Global Economy (2005)
[49]
Albanesi Reports of AI Ending Human Labour May Be Greatly Exaggerated
[50]
Ibid

Showing 50 of 65 references

Metrics
7
Citations
65
References
Details
Published
Jan 01, 2024
Cite This Article
John Zysman, Mark Nitzberg (2024). Generative AI and the Future of Work: Augmentation or Automation?. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4811728
Related

You May Also Like