Abstract
Background
The personalization of conversational agents with natural language user interfaces is seeing increasing use in health care applications, shaping the content, structure, or purpose of the dialogue between humans and conversational agents.


Objective
The goal of this systematic review was to understand the ways in which personalization has been used with conversational agents in health care and characterize the methods of its implementation.


Methods
We searched on PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and ACM Digital Library using a predefined search strategy. The studies were included if they: (1) were primary research studies that focused on consumers, caregivers, or health care professionals; (2) involved a conversational agent with an unconstrained natural language interface; (3) tested the system with human subjects; and (4) implemented personalization features.


Results
The search found 1958 publications. After abstract and full-text screening, 13 studies were included in the review. Common examples of personalized content included feedback, daily health reports, alerts, warnings, and recommendations. The personalization features were implemented without a theoretical framework of customization and with limited evaluation of its impact. While conversational agents with personalization features were reported to improve user satisfaction, user engagement and dialogue quality, the role of personalization in improving health outcomes was not assessed directly.


Conclusions
Most of the studies in our review implemented the personalization features without theoretical or evidence-based support for them and did not leverage the recent developments in other domains of personalization. Future research could incorporate personalization as a distinct design factor with a more careful consideration of its impact on health outcomes and its implications on patient safety, privacy, and decision-making.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
72
[1]
McTear, M The conversational interface: Talking to smart devices (2016) 10.1007/978-3-319-32967-3
[2]
Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review

Liliana Laranjo, Adam G Dunn, Huong Ly Tong et al.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Associ... 10.1093/jamia/ocy072
[4]
Chatbots and Conversational Agents in Mental Health: A Review of the Psychiatric Landscape

Aditya Nrusimha Vaidyam, Hannah Wisniewski, John David Halamka et al.

The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 10.1177/0706743719828977
[6]
Cambridge dictionaries online20152019-09-16Cambridge University Presshttp://dictionary.cambridge.org
[8]
Rich, E Readings in intelligent user interfaces (1998)
[18]
BrennanSLexical entrainment in spontaneous dialog1996Proceedings of ISSD 961996Philadelphia4144
[19]
CareniniGMooreJDAn empirical study of the influence of user tailoring on evaluative argument effectiveness2001Proceedings of the 17th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 22001Seattle, WAMorgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc130712
[28]
Coiera, E Yearb Med Inform (2012)
[32]
PerezSTechcrunch20192019-09-16Report: Voice assistants in use to triple to 8 billion by 2023https://techcrunch.com/2019/02/12/report-voice-assistants-in-use-to-triple-to-8-billion-by-2023/
[34]
Radziwill, NM arXiv preprint (2017)
[43]
Azzini, I Stud Health Technol Inform (2003)
[48]
The PHQ-9

Kurt Kroenke, Robert L. Spitzer, Janet B. W. Williams

Journal of General Internal Medicine 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
[49]
A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Robert L. Spitzer, Kurt Kroenke, Janet B. W. Williams et al.

Archives of Internal Medicine 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092

Showing 50 of 72 references