journal article Nov 03, 2020

Effect of Pain Education and Exercise on Pain and Function in Chronic Achilles Tendinopathy: Protocol for a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial

Abstract
Background
Achilles tendinopathy (AT) rehabilitation traditionally includes progressive tendon loading exercises. Recent evidence suggests a biopsychosocial approach that incorporates patient education on psychosocial factors and mechanisms of pain can reduce pain and disability in individuals with chronic pain. This is yet to be examined in individuals with AT.


Objective
This study aims to compare the effects on movement-evoked pain and self-reported function of pain education as part of a biopsychosocial approach with pathoanatomical education for people with AT when combined with a progressive tendon loading exercise program.


Methods
A single-site, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial will be conducted in a university-based hospital in a laboratory setting and/or by telehealth. A total of 66 participants with chronic (>3 months) midportion or insertional AT will be randomized for the Tendinopathy Education of the Achilles (TEAch) study. All participants will complete progressive Achilles tendon loading exercises over 12 weeks and will be encouraged to continue with self-selected exercises as tolerated. All participants will complete 6-7 one-to-one sessions with a physical therapist to progress exercises in a standardized manner over 8 weeks. During the last 4 weeks of the intervention, participants will be encouraged to maintain their home exercise program. Participants will be randomized to 1 of 2 types of education (pain education or pathoanatomic), in addition to exercise. Pain education will focus on the biological and psychological mechanisms of pain within a biopsychosocial framing of AT. Pathoanatomic education will focus on biological processes within a more traditional biomedical framework of AT. Evaluation sessions will be completed at baseline and 8-week follow-up, and self-reported outcome measures will be completed at the 12-week follow-up. Both groups will complete progressive Achilles loading exercises in 4 phases throughout the 12 weeks and will be encouraged to continue with self-selected exercises as tolerated. Primary outcomes are movement-evoked pain during heel raises and self-reported function (patient-reported outcome measure information system—Physical Function). Secondary outcomes assess central nervous system nociceptive processing, psychological factors, motor function, and feasibility.


Results
Institutional review board approval was obtained on April 15, 2019, and study funding began in July 2019. As of March 2020, we randomized 23 out of 66 participants. In September 2020, we screened 267 individuals, consented 68 participants, and randomized 51 participants. We anticipate completing the primary data analysis by March 2022.


Conclusions
The TEAch study will evaluate the utility of pain education for those with AT and the effects of improved patient knowledge on pain, physical function, and clinical outcomes.


International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)
DERR1-10.2196/19111
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
61
[5]
Local Anesthetic Injection Resolves Movement Pain, Motor Dysfunction, and Pain Catastrophizing in Individuals With Chronic Achilles Tendinopathy: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Ruth L. Chimenti, Mederic M. Hall, Connor P. Dilger et al.

Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Thera... 10.2519/jospt.2020.9242
[7]
PAIN SENSITIVITY IN CHRONIC ACHILLES TENDINOPATHY

Brian J. Eckenrode, David M. Kietrys, Scott K. Stackhouse

International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy 2019 10.26603/ijspt20190945
[9]
Pain Neuroscience Education for Adults With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

James A. Watson, Cormac G. Ryan, Lesley Cooper et al.

The Journal of Pain 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.02.011
[12]
Heavy Slow Resistance Versus Eccentric Training as Treatment for Achilles Tendinopathy

Rikke Beyer, Mads Kongsgaard, Birgitte Hougs Kjær et al.

The American Journal of Sports Medicine 10.1177/0363546515584760
[16]
Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale

Fausto Salaffi, Andrea Stancati, Carlo Alberto Silvestri et al.

European Journal of Pain 10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.09.004
[22]
Explain, PS Explain Pain Supercharged: The Clinician's Manual (2020)
[23]
Moseley, GL The Explain Pain Handbook Protectometer (2015)
[24]
Retrain Pain Foundation2019-03-27https://www.retrainpain.org/english
[25]
Thorn, BE Cognitive Therapy for Chronic Pain, Second Edition: A Step-by-Step Guide (2017)
[26]
Thorn, BE Managing Chronic Pain – Patient Workbook (2017)
[27]
LessonsFIFA Medical Platform2019-07-01https://www.fifamedicalnetwork.com/lessons/
[28]
Achilles TendinitisOrthoInfo - American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons2020-07-01https://orthoinfo.aaos.org/en/diseases--conditions/achilles-tendinitis/
[31]
ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription (2000)
[34]
KahlCClelandJAVisual analogue scale, numeric pain rating scale and the McGill pain questionnaire: an overview of psychometric propertiesPhysical Therapy Reviews201307192019-06-30https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1179/108331905X55776
[35]
Global Rating of Change Scales: A Review of Strengths and Weaknesses and Considerations for Design

Steven J Kamper, Christopher G Maher, Grant Mackay

Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy 10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.163
[37]
The VISA-A questionnaire: a valid and reliable index of the clinical severity of Achilles tendinopathy

J M Robinson, J L Cook, C Purdam et al.

British Journal of Sports Medicine 10.1136/bjsm.35.5.335
[38]
International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-Country Reliability and Validity

Cora L. Craig, ALISON L. MARSHALL, MICHAEL SJ??STR??M et al.

Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 10.1249/01.mss.0000078924.61453.fb
[45]
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation.

Michael J. L. Sullivan, Scott R. Bishop, Jayne Pivik

Psychological Assessment 10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.524
[46]
Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale

Augustine Osman, Francisco X. Barrios, Beverly A. Kopper et al.

Journal of Behavioral Medicine 10.1023/a:1025570508954
[48]
Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic pain: A psychometric assessment of the original English version of the Tampa scale for kinesiophobia (TSK)

Douglas J. French, Christopher R. France, François Vigneau et al.

Pain 10.1016/j.pain.2006.07.016
[49]
[50]
Validation of the PROMIS® measures of self-efficacy for managing chronic conditions

Ann L. Gruber-Baldini, Craig Velozo, Sergio Romero et al.

Quality of Life Research 10.1007/s11136-017-1527-3

Showing 50 of 61 references