journal article Jul 19, 2021

New Evidence in the Booming Field of Online Mindfulness: An Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Abstract
Background
There is a need to regularly update the evidence base on the effectiveness of online mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs), especially considering how fast this field is growing and developing.


Objective
This study presents an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of online MBIs on mental health and the potential moderators of these effects.


Methods
We conducted a systematic literature search in PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science up to December 4, 2020, and included 97 trials, totaling 125 comparisons. Pre-to-post and pre-to-follow-up between-group effect sizes (Hedges g) were calculated for depression, anxiety, stress, well-being, and mindfulness using a random effects model.


Results
The findings revealed statistically significant moderate pre-to-post effects on depression (g=0.34, 95% CI 0.18-0.50; P<.001), stress (g=0.44, 95% CI 0.32-0.55; P<.001), and mindfulness (g=0.40, 95% CI 0.30-0.50; P<.001) and small effects on anxiety (g=0.26, 95% CI 0.18-0.33; P<.001). For well-being, a significant small effect was found only when omitting outliers (g=0.22, 95% CI 0.15-0.29; P<.001) or low-quality studies (g=0.26, 95% CI 0.12-0.41; P<.001). Significant but small follow-up effects were found for depression (g=0.25, 95% CI 0.12-0.38) and anxiety (g=0.23, 95% CI 0.13-0.32). Subgroup analyses revealed that online MBIs resulted in higher effect sizes for stress when offered with guidance. In terms of stress and mindfulness, studies that used inactive control conditions yielded larger effects. For anxiety, populations with psychological symptoms had higher effect sizes. Adherence rates for the interventions ranged from 35% to 92%, but most studies lacked clear definitions or cut-offs.


Conclusions
Our findings not only demonstrate that online MBIs are booming but also corroborate previous findings that online MBIs are beneficial for improving mental health outcomes in a broad range of populations. To advance the field of online MBIs, future trials should pay specific attention to methodological quality, adherence, and long-term follow-up measurements.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
159
[2]
Kabat-Zinn, J Full Catastrophe Living: Using the Wisdom of Your Body and Mind to Face Stress, Pain and Illness (1990)
[5]
Segal, Z Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Depression: A New Approach to Preventing Relapse (2002)
[6]
Linehan, M Cognitive-Bhavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder (1993)
[7]
Hayes, S Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: An Experiential Approach to Behavior Change (1999)
[28]
Effectiveness of online mindfulness-based interventions in improving mental health: A review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

M.P.J. Spijkerman, W.T.M. Pots, E.T. Bohlmeijer

Clinical Psychology Review 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.03.009
[32]
Wahbeh, H Altern Ther Health Med (2016)

Showing 50 of 159 references

Metrics
157
Citations
159
References
Details
Published
Jul 19, 2021
Vol/Issue
8(7)
Pages
e28168
Cite This Article
Marion Sommers-Spijkerman, Judith Austin, Ernst Bohlmeijer, et al. (2021). New Evidence in the Booming Field of Online Mindfulness: An Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. JMIR Mental Health, 8(7), e28168. https://doi.org/10.2196/28168