Quality, Usability, and Effectiveness of mHealth Apps and the Role of Artificial Intelligence: Current Scenario and Challenges

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) and big data in medicine has increased in recent years. Indeed, the use of AI in mobile health (mHealth) apps could considerably assist both individuals and health care professionals in the prevention and management of chronic diseases, in a person-centered manner. Nonetheless, there are several challenges that must be overcome to provide high-quality, usable, and effective mHealth apps. Here, we review the rationale and guidelines for the implementation of mHealth apps and the challenges regarding quality, usability, and user engagement and behavior change, with a special focus on the prevention and management of noncommunicable diseases. We suggest that a cocreation-based framework is the best method to address these challenges. Finally, we describe the current and future roles of AI in improving personalized medicine and provide recommendations for developing AI-based mHealth apps. We conclude that the implementation of AI and mHealth apps for routine clinical practice and remote health care will not be feasible until we overcome the main challenges regarding data privacy and security, quality assessment, and the reproducibility and uncertainty of AI results. Moreover, there is a lack of both standardized methods to measure the clinical outcomes of mHealth apps and techniques to encourage user engagement and behavior changes in the long term. We expect that in the near future, these obstacles will be overcome and that the ongoing European project, Watching the risk factors (WARIFA), will provide considerable advances in the implementation of AI-based mHealth apps for disease prevention and health promotion.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

136

[1]

Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013-2020 (2013)

[2]

Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

Theo Vos, Stephen S Lim, Cristiana Abbafati et al.

The Lancet 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30925-9

[3]

Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

Christopher J L Murray, Aleksandr Y Aravkin, Peng Zheng et al.

The Lancet 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30752-2

[4]

Mobile Apps for Health Behavior Change in Physical Activity, Diet, Drug and Alcohol Use, and Mental Health: Systematic Review

Madison Milne-Ives, Ching Lam, Caroline de Cock et al.

JMIR mHealth and uHealth 10.2196/17046

[5]

10.1111/dme.14156

[6]

10.1016/j.endien.2019.05.001

[7]

10.1080/23808993.2017.1380516

[8]

Precision Medicine, AI, and the Future of Personalized Health Care

Kevin B. Johnson, Wei‐Qi Wei, Dilhan Weeraratne et al.

Clinical and Translational Science 10.1111/cts.12884

[9]

10.3390/diagnostics11040607

[10]

10.1111/jep.13528

[11]

10.1109/rbme.2018.2864254

[12]

10.1111/obr.12903

[13]

10.2196/12053

[14]

10.2196/21759

[15]

10.2196/jmir.9751

[16]

10.2196/17039

[17]

10.2196/21563

[18]

10.2196/17458

[19]

10.1002/14651858.cd010013.pub2

[20]

WHO guideline: recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengtheningWorld Health Organization20192023-04-14https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550505

[21]

Principles for Digital Development homepagePrinciples for Digital Development2023-04-14https://digitalprinciples.org/

[22]

Mobile health apps interactive toolFederal Trade Commission2023-04-14https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/business-center/guidance/mobile-health-apps-interactive-tool

[23]

Commission Notice — The ‘Blue Guide’ on the implementation of EU products rules 2016 (Text with EEA relevance)Official Journal of the European Union2023-04-14https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.C_.2016.272.01.0001.01.ENG

[24]

Guidance - MDCG endorsed documents and other guidanceEuropean Commission2023-04-14https://ec.europa.eu/health/md_sector/new_regulations/guidance_en

[25]

Manual on borderline and classification in the community regulatory framework for medical devicesEuropean Commission20192023-04-14https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/md_topics-interest/docs/md_borderline_manual_05_2019_en.pdf

[26]

European mHealth hub homepageEuropean mHealth hub2023-04-14https://mhealth-hub.org/

[27]

D2.1 knowledge tool 1. Health apps assessment frameworksEuropean mHealth Hub2023-04-14https://mhealth-hub.org/download/d2-1-knowledge-tool-1-health-apps-assessment-frameworks-pending-ec-approval

[28]

Martín, FA Revista Española de Salud Pública (2020)

[29]

10.1038/s41746-020-0260-4

[30]

Health on the Net homepageHealth on the Net2023-04-17http://www.hon.ch/en/tools.html#honcodeextension

[31]

10.4018/ijeis.2019040102

[32]

AkterSD'AmbraJRayPUser perceived service quality of mHealth services in developing countriesProceedings of the ECIS 20102010ECIS 2010 ProceedingsJun 7-9, 2010Pretoria, South Africa

[33]

The Organisation for the Review of Care and Health Apps (ORCHA) homepageThe Organisation for the Review of Care and Health Apps (ORCHA)2023-04-14https://orchahealth.com/

[34]

Healthy living appsVicHealth2023-04-14https://www.vichealth.vic.gov.au/media-and-resources/vichealth-apps

[35]

The DISCERN InstrumentDISCERN2023-04-14http://www.discern.org.uk/discern_instrument.php

[36]

10.2196/11129

[37]

ISO 9241-11:2018(en) Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 11: Usability: Definitions and conceptsISO2023-04-14https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-2:v1:en

[38]

Nielsen, J Usability Engineering (1993)

[39]

10.1097/cin.0000000000000526

[40]

10.1016/j.diabres.2017.06.016

[41]

10.2196/22074

[42]

10.1016/j.ekir.2018.11.016

[43]

10.1016/j.jbi.2016.10.001

[44]

10.2196/14543

[45]

10.2196/20317

[46]

10.2196/22990

[47]

10.1038/s41746-019-0212-z

[48]

10.4338/aci-2016-10-r-0170

[49]

Brooke, J Usability Evaluation In Industry (1996)

[50]

10.1145/57167.57203

Showing 50 of 136 references

Cited By

208

Consumer Behavior Toward Health‐Related Mobile Applications: A Hybrid Review and Future Agenda

Omer Faruk Celebi, Ebru Tumer · 2026

Journal of Consumer Behaviour

Development and implementation of personalized postoperative care plans for gynecological oncology patients under the precision medicine paradigm: strategies to enhance patient participation and self-management capacity

Xifen Hu, Yun Han · 2026

World Journal of Surgical Oncology

Analysis of User Experience Usage on the Sardjito Hospital and Yogyakarta Regional Public Hospital Websites Using the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ)

Putry Wahyu Setyaningsih, Albert Yakobus Chandra · 2025

International Journal of Advances i...

A 25-Year Retrospective of the Use of AI for Diagnosing Acute Stroke: Systematic Review

Zhaoxin Wang, Wenwen Yang · 2024

Journal of Medical Internet Researc...

Metrics

208

Citations

136

References

Details

Published: May 04, 2023
Vol/Issue: 25
Pages: e44030

Authors

A

Alejandro Deniz-Garcia

H

Himar Fabelo

A

Antonio J Rodriguez-Almeida

G

Garlene Zamora-Zamorano

M

Maria Castro-Fernandez

M

Maria del Pino Alberiche Ruano

Cristina Soguero-Ruíz

A

Ana M Wägner

Cite This Article

Alejandro Deniz-Garcia, Himar Fabelo, Antonio J Rodriguez-Almeida, et al. (2023). Quality, Usability, and Effectiveness of mHealth Apps and the Role of Artificial Intelligence: Current Scenario and Challenges. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e44030. https://doi.org/10.2196/44030

Quality, Usability, and Effectiveness of mHealth Apps and the Role of Artificial Intelligence: Current Scenario and Challenges

You May Also Like