journal article Sep 30, 2024

Clinical Decision Support and Natural Language Processing in Medicine: Systematic Literature Review

Abstract
Background
Ensuring access to accurate and verified information is essential for effective patient treatment and diagnosis. Although health workers rely on the internet for clinical data, there is a need for a more streamlined approach.


Objective
This systematic review aims to assess the current state of artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP) techniques in health care to identify their potential use in electronic health records and automated information searches.


Methods
A search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science online databases for articles published between January 2000 and April 2023. The only inclusion criteria were (1) original research articles and studies on the application of AI-based medical clinical decision support using NLP techniques and (2) publications in English. A Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool was used to assess the quality of the studies.


Results
The search yielded 707 articles, from which 26 studies were included (24 original articles and 2 systematic reviews). Of the evaluated articles, 21 (81%) explained the use of NLP as a source of data collection, 18 (69%) used electronic health records as a data source, and a further 8 (31%) were based on clinical data. Only 5 (19%) of the articles showed the use of combined strategies for NLP to obtain clinical data. In total, 16 (62%) articles presented stand-alone data review algorithms. Other studies (n=9, 35%) showed that the clinical decision support system alternative was also a way of displaying the information obtained for immediate clinical use.


Conclusions
The use of NLP engines can effectively improve clinical decision systems’ accuracy, while biphasic tools combining AI algorithms and human criteria may optimize clinical diagnosis and treatment flows.


Trial Registration
PROSPERO CRD42022373386; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=373386
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
67
[9]
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Matthew J. Page, Joanne E. McKenzie, Patrick M. Bossuyt et al.

PLoS Medicine 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583
[11]
CASP (qualitative studies) checklistCritical Appraisal Skills Programme20182020-12-22https://casp-uk.net/images/checklist/documents/CASP-Qualitative-Studies-Checklist/CASP-Qualitative-Checklist-2018_fillable_form.pdf
[22]
Sordo, M Stud Health Technol Inform (2013)
[23]
Mehrabi, S Stud Health Technol Inform (2013)
[24]
Patterson, OV Stud Health Technol Inform (2015)
[26]
Mei, J Stud Health Technol Inform (2015)
[27]
Marco-Ruiz, L Stud Health Technol Inform (2015)
[28]
Danger, R Stud Health Technol Inform (2015)
[32]
Designing an openEHR-Based Pipeline for Extracting and Standardizing Unstructured Clinical Data Using Natural Language Processing

Antje Wulff, Marcel Mast, Marcus Hassler et al.

Methods of Information in Medicine 10.1055/s-0040-1716403
[50]
Ceusters, W Stud Health Technol Inform (2016)

Showing 50 of 67 references

Cited By
49
Oculomics: Current concepts and evidence

Zhuoting Zhu, Yueye Wang · 2025

Progress in Retinal and Eye Researc...
Metrics
49
Citations
67
References
Details
Published
Sep 30, 2024
Vol/Issue
26
Pages
e55315
Cite This Article
Hans Eguia, Carlos Luis Sánchez-Bocanegra, Franco Vinciarelli, et al. (2024). Clinical Decision Support and Natural Language Processing in Medicine: Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e55315. https://doi.org/10.2196/55315