Debunking the Myth of Interest Group Invincibility in the Courts

Lee Epstein; C. K. Rowland

doi:10.2307/1962886

journal article Mar 01, 1991

Debunking the Myth of Interest Group Invincibility in the Courts

Lee Epstein C. K. Rowland

American Political Science Review Vol. 85 No. 1 pp. 205-217 · Cambridge University Press (CUP)

View at Publisher Save 10.2307/1962886

Abstract

Research on interest group litigation has provoked a reevaluation of the conventional wisdom about the study of pressure group activity and judicial politics. Nevertheless, the notion that interest groups are intrepid litigators that rarely lose to nongroup adversaries persists unchallenged and unscathed. We seek to determine if groups are, in fact, as invincible as the literature suggests. Several findings emerge that may undermine conventional wisdom about the relative efficacy of group-sponsored litigation. Most important is that groups are no more likely than nongroups to win, at least in U.S. District Courts. Based on this and other results, we draw a number of conclusions about interest group litigation and the direction into which future study might head.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

45

[1]

Casper (1972)

[2]

Vose (1972)

[3]

Manwaring (1962)

[4]

Spaeth (1979)

[5]

10.1177/000271625831900104

[6]

10.2307/1955796

[7]

Gates, John B. and McIntosh, Wayne V. . 1989. “The Motivations for Interest Group Litigation.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Law & Society Association, Madison, Wisconsin.

[8]

10.2307/2130784

[9]

10.2307/2131278

[10]

Olson (1984)

[11]

10.2307/2127811

[12]

Carp (1983)

[13]

Cigler (1986)

[14]

Sorauf (1976)

[15]

Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change

Marc Galanter

Law & Society Review 10.2307/3053023

[16]

Baker "Forward: Toward a Center for State and Local Legal Advocacy." Catholic University Law Review (1982)

[17]

James (1987)

[18]

10.2307/1961752

[19]

10.5149/uncp/9780807855959

[20]

Cortner "Strategies and Tactics of Litigants in Constitutional Cases." Journal of Public Law (1968)

[21]

Babbie (1986)

[22]

Berry (1989)

[23]

Greenberg (1977)

[24]

Schlozman (1986)

[25]

O'Connor (1980)

[26]

Lawrence "Legal Services before the Supreme Court." Judicature (1989)

[27]

10.2307/2109286

[28]

Hakman (1969)

[29]

10.2307/794698

[30]

10.1111/j.1747-4469.1984.tb00899.x

[31]

Epstein "States and the U.S. Supreme Court: An Examination of Litigation Outcomes." Social Science Quarterly (1988)

[32]

10.2307/2130898

[33]

10.1515/9781400861460

[34]

Scheingold (1974)

[35]

10.2307/1962586

[36]

Wasby (1988)

[37]

10.1037/e309762005-014

[38]

10.1525/9780520325647

[39]

Epstein (1985)

[40]

Nachmias (1987)

[41]

10.2307/1959864

[42]

10.9783/9781512809503

[43]

Yinger (1977)

[44]

Rubin (1987)

[45]

Puro, Steven . 1971. “The Role of Amicus Curiae in the United States Supreme Court: 1920–1966.” Buffalo, NY: State University of New York. Dissertation.

Metrics

48

Citations

45

References

Details

Published: Mar 01, 1991
Vol/Issue: 85(1)
Pages: 205-217
License: View

Authors

Cite This Article

Lee Epstein, C. K. Rowland (1991). Debunking the Myth of Interest Group Invincibility in the Courts. American Political Science Review, 85(1), 205-217. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962886

Debunking the Myth of Interest Group Invincibility in the Courts

You May Also Like