journal article Mar 01, 2000

Understanding Computer-Mediated Discussions: Positivist and Interpretive Analyses of Group Support System Use1

MIS Quarterly Vol. 24 No. 1 pp. 43-79 · MIS Quarterly
Abstract
This research considers whether interpretive techniques can be used to enhance our understanding of computer-mediated discussions. The case study considered in this research is the use of a group support system (GSS) to support employee discussions about gender equity in a university. Transcripts of the four discussions were analyzed using two analysis techniques: a positivist approach, which was focused on the GSS sessions themselves, and an interpretive approach which broadened the scope to include contextual considerations as well. What emerged from the positivist analysis was the conclusion of effective group behavior directed toward consensus around alternative solution scenarios. What emerged from the interpretive analysis was evidence of multiple, rich types of information at three levels: cognitive, affective, and behavioral. The interpretive analysis also uncovered the absence of shared consciousness about the issue and imbalanced participation in the sessions. Comparison of the results of both approaches showed that, while the positivist analysis provided useful information, the interpretive analysis provided a different understanding of the same evidence and new information not found in the positivist analysis of the group discussions. This research adds to the body of knowledge concerning the effects of virtual group meetings on the type of information that is shared and the value of a combination of positivist and interpretive analyses of GSS data.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
91
[1]
Agar (1986) 10.4135/9781412985895
[2]
Avison "Information Systems and Anthropology: An Anthropological Perspective on IT and Organizational Culture" Information Technology & People (1995) 10.1108/09593849510098262
[3]
Boland "Information System Use as a Hermeneutic Process" (1991)
[4]
Boland "Phenomenology: A Preferred Approach to Research in Information Systems" (1985)
[5]
Chidambaram "Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups" MIS Quarterly (1996) 10.2307/249476
[6]
Chidambaram "Evolution of Group Performance Over Time: A Repeated Measures Study of GDSS Effects" Journal of Organizational Computing (1993) 10.1080/10919399309540212
[7]
Chidambaram "A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Group Decision Support Systems on Group Development" Journal of Management Information Systems (1990) 10.1080/07421222.1990.11517894
[8]
Connolly "Idea Generation Using a GDSS: Effects of Anonymity and Evaluative Tone" Management Science (1990) 10.1287/mnsc.36.6.689
[9]
Creswell (1998)
[10]
Davidson "Examining Project History Narratives: An Analytic Approach" (1997) 10.1007/978-0-387-35309-8_9
[11]
Davies "Researching the Organisational Cultural Contexts of Information Systems Strategy: A Case Study of the British Army" (1991)
[12]
Davies "An Ethnographic Study of Configuration Management and Documentation Practices in an Information Technology Center" (1992)
[13]
Davis "Diagnosis of an Information System Failure: A Framework and Interpretive Process" Information & Management (1992) 10.1016/0378-7206(92)90059-o
[14]
Dennis "Bringing Automated Support to Large Groups: The Burr-Brown Experience" Information & Management (1990) 10.1016/0378-7206(90)90065-p
[15]
Dennis "Computer Brainstorms: More Heads are Better Than One" Journal of Applied Psychology (1993) 10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.531
[16]
Dennis "Group, Subgroup and Nominal Group Idea Generation: New Rules for a New Media?" Journal of Management (1994) 10.1177/014920639402000402
[17]
Process Structuring in Electronic Brainstorming

Alan R. Dennis, Joseph S. Valacich, Terry Connolly et al.

Information Systems Research 1996 10.1287/isre.7.2.268
[18]
Dennis "An Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Group Size in an Electronic Meeting Environment" IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (1990) 10.1109/21.59968
[19]
DeSanctis "Shifting Foundations in Group Support System Research" (1993)
[20]
DeSanctis "Using Computing in the Face-to-Face Meeting: Some Initial Observations from the Texaco-Minnesota Project"
[21]
DeSanctis "Group Decision Support Systems: A New Frontier" Database (1985)
[22]
DeSanctis "A Foundation for the Study of Group Decision Support Systems" Management Science (1987) 10.1287/mnsc.33.5.589
[23]
Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory

Gerardine DeSanctis, Marshall Scott Poole

Organization Science 1994 10.1287/orsc.5.2.121
[24]
DeSanctis "An Interpretive Analysis of Team Use of Group Technologies" Journal of Organizational Computing (1993) 10.1080/10919399309540193
[25]
DeSanctis "Using Computing in Quality Team Meetings: Some Initial Observations from the IRS-Minnesota Project" Journal of Management Information Systems (1992) 10.1080/07421222.1991.11517927
[26]
Ely (1991)
[27]
Fetterman (1998)
[28]
Fulk "Electronic Communication and Changing Organizational Forms" Organization Science (1995) 10.1287/orsc.6.4.337
[29]
Gallupe "Electronic Brainstorming and Group Size" Academy of Management Journal (1992) 10.2307/256377
[30]
Gallupe "Computer-Based Support for Group Problem-Finding: An Experimental Investigation" MIS Quarterly (1988) 10.2307/248853
[31]
Geertz (1973)
[32]
Glaser (1967)
[33]
Golden-Biddle "Appealing Work: An Investigation of How Ethnographic Texts Convince" Organization Science (1993) 10.1287/orsc.4.4.595
[34]
Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs

Jennifer C. Greene, Valerie J. Caracelli, Wendy F. Graham

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 1989 10.3102/01623737011003255
[35]
Harvey "A Discourse on Ethnography" (1997) 10.1007/978-0-387-35309-8_12
[36]
Harvey "Scholarship and Practice: The Contribution of Ethnographic Research Methods to Bridging the Gap" Information Technology & People (1995) 10.1108/09593849510098244
[37]
Hempel (1966)
[38]
Hughes "Faltering from Ethnography to Design"
[39]
Jessup "Group Decision Support Systems: A Need for Behavioral Research" International Journal of Small Group Research (1987)
[40]
Jessup "The Effects of Anonymity on GDSS Group Process with an Idea-Generating Task" MIS Quarterly (1990) 10.2307/248893
[41]
Jessup "Understanding Computer-Supported Group Work: The Effects of Interaction Frequency on Group Process and Outcome" Journal of Research on Computing in Education (1996) 10.1080/08886504.1995.10782160
[42]
Jessup "Group Decision Making in an Automated Environment: The Effects of Anonymity and Proximity with a Group Decision Support System" Decision Sciences (1991) 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1991.tb00346.x
[43]
Jessup (1993)
[44]
Jick "Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action" Administrative Science Quarterly (1979) 10.2307/2392366
[45]
Kaplan "Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Information Systems Research: A Case Study" MIS Quarterly (1988) 10.2307/249133
[46]
Kaplan "Qualitative Research Methods for Evaluating Computer Information Systems" (1994)
[47]
Kirk (1986) 10.4135/9781412985659
[48]
[49]
Kolakowski (1968)
[50]
Kwan "Gender Differences and Computing: Students’ Assessment of Societal Influences" Education and Computing (1985) 10.1016/s0167-9287(85)91556-0

Showing 50 of 91 references

Cited By
159
Information & Management
Information Systems Journal
Social informatics: Perspectives, examples, and trends

Steve Sawyer, Kristin R. Eschenfelder · 2002

Annual Review of Information Scienc...
Metrics
159
Citations
91
References
Details
Published
Mar 01, 2000
Vol/Issue
24(1)
Pages
43-79
Cite This Article
Eileen M. Trauth, Leonard M. Jessup (2000). Understanding Computer-Mediated Discussions: Positivist and Interpretive Analyses of Group Support System Use1. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 43-79. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250979
Related

You May Also Like