Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
42
[1]
1. Schanzer A, Oderich GS. Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1690–1698. 10.1056/nejmcp2108504
[2]
2. Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, et al. Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: A randomized trial. JAMA 2009; 302:1535–1542. 10.1001/jama.2009.1426
[3]
3. Prinssen M, Verhoeven ELG, Buth J, et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:1607–1618. 10.1056/nejmoa042002
[4]
4. Patel R, Sweeting MJ, Powell JT, Greenhalgh RM; EVAR trial investigators. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years’ follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016; 388:2366–2374. 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31135-7
[5]
5. Sekhri AR, Lees WR, Adiseshiah M. Measurement of aortic compliance in abdominal aortic aneurysms before and after open and endoluminal repair: Preliminary results. J Endovasc Ther 2004; 11:472–482. 10.1583/04-1243.1
[6]
6. van Herwaarden JA, Muhs BE, Vincken KL, et al. Aortic compliance following EVAR and the influence of different endografts: Determination using dynamic MRA. J Endovasc Ther 2006; 13:406–414. 10.1583/06-1848.1
[7]
7. Long A, Rouet L, Bissery A, Rossignol P, Mouradian D, Sapoval M. Compliance of abdominal aortic aneurysms evaluated by tissue Doppler imaging: Correlation with aneurysm size. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42:18–26. 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.03.037
[8]
8. Blankensteijn JD, de Jong SECA, Prinssen M, et al. Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:2398–2405. 10.1056/nejmoa051255
[9]
9. van Bakel TMJ, Arthurs CJ, Nauta FJH, et al. Cardiac remodelling following thoracic endovascular aortic repair for descending aortic aneurysms. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 55:1061–1070. 10.1093/ejcts/ezy399
[10]
10. Yamashita Y, Oishi Y, Motomatsu Y, et al. Thoracic endografting increases cardiac afterload and leads to left ventricular hypertrophy in dogs. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 55:618–625. 10.1093/ejcts/ezy402
[11]
11. Takeda Y, Sakata Y, Ohtani T, et al. Endovascular aortic repair increases vascular stiffness and alters cardiac structure and function. Circ J 2014; 78:322–328. 10.1253/circj.cj-13-0877
[12]
12. Vallerio P, Maloberti A, D’Alessio I, et al. Cardiovascular remodeling after endovascular treatment for thoracic aortic injury. Ann Vasc Surg 2019; 61:134–141. 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.04.015
[13]
13. Horiguchi R, Takehara Y, Sugiyama M, et al. Postendovascular aneurysmal repair increase in local energy loss for fusiform abdominal aortic aneurysm: Assessments with 4D flow MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2023; 57:1199–1211. 10.1002/jmri.28359
[14]
14. Ben-Shlomo Y, Spears M, Boustred C, et al. Aortic pulse wave velocity improves cardiovascular event prediction: An individual participant meta-analysis of prospective observational data from 17,635 subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63:636–646. 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.063
[15]
Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications

S. Laurent, J. Cockcroft, L. Van Bortel et al.

European Heart Journal 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl254
[16]
16. Sequí-Domínguez I, Cavero-Redondo I, Álvarez-Bueno C, Pozuelo-Carrascosa DP, Nuñez de Arenas-Arroyo S, Martínez-Vizcaíno V. Accuracy of pulse wave velocity predicting cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 2020; 9:2080. 10.3390/jcm9072080
[17]
17. Bissacco D, Conti M, Domanin M, et al. Modifications in aortic stiffness after endovascular or open aortic repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2022; 63:567–577. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.01.008
[18]
Regional and Global Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Marcus Lindenberger, Magnus Ziegler, Niclas Bjarnegård et al.

European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surg... 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.09.040
[19]
19. Lantelme P, Dzudie A, Milon H, et al. Effect of abdominal aortic grafts on aortic stiffness and central hemodynamics. J Hypertens 2009; 27:1268–1276. 10.1097/hjh.0b013e3283299b22
[20]
20. Yamashita Y, Oishi Y, Matsuyama S, et al. Determinants of changes in arterial stiffness after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Ann Vasc Surg 2021; 70:474–480. 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.06.062
[21]
21. de Beaufort HWL, Conti M, Kamman AV, et al. Stent-graft deployment increases aortic stiffness in an ex vivo porcine model. Ann Vasc Surg 2017; 43:302–308. 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.04.024
[22]
22. Moulakakis KG, Kadoglou NPE, Antonopoulos CN, et al. Changes in arterial stiffness and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels after endovascular repair of descending thoracic aorta. Ann Vasc Surg 2017; 38:220–226. 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.04.025
[23]
23. Itatani K, Miyazaki S, Furusawa T, et al. New imaging tools in cardiovascular medicine: Computational fluid dynamics and 4D flow MRI. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 65:611–621. 10.1007/s11748-017-0834-5
[24]
24. Takehara Y. Clinical application of 4D flow MR imaging for the abdominal aorta. Magn Reson Med Sci 2022; 21:354–364. 10.2463/mrms.rev.2021-0156
[25]
25. Ristow I, Riedel C, Lenz A, et al. Current imaging strategies in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Rofo 2024; 196:52–61. 10.1055/a-2119-6448
[26]
26. Takahashi K, Sekine T, Ando T, Ishii Y, Kumita S. Utility of 4D flow MRI in thoracic aortic diseases: A literature review of clinical applications and current evidence. Magn Reson Med Sci 2022; 21:327–339. 10.2463/mrms.rev.2021-0046
[27]
27. Takahashi K, Sekine T, Miyagi Y, et al. Four-dimensional flow analysis reveals mechanism and impact of turbulent flow in the dissected aorta. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 60:1064–1072. 10.1093/ejcts/ezab201
[28]
28. Munakata M, Ito N, Nunokawa T, Yoshinaga K. Utility of automated brachial ankle pulse wave velocity measurements in hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens 2003; 16:653–657. 10.1016/s0895-7061(03)00918-x
[29]
29. Barker AJ, van Ooij P, Bandi K, et al. Viscous energy loss in the presence of abnormal aortic flow. Magn Reson Med 2014; 72:620–628. 10.1002/mrm.24962
[30]
30. Chinsakchai K, Sirivech T, Moll FL, Tongsai S, Hongku K. The correlation of aortic neck angle and length in abdominal aortic aneurysm with severe neck angulation for prediction of intraoperative neck complications and postoperative outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5797. 10.3390/jcm12185797
[31]
31. Tomiyama H, Matsumoto C, Shiina K, Yamashina A. Brachial-ankle PWV: Current status and future directions as a useful marker in the management of cardiovascular disease and/or cardiovascular risk factors. J Atheroscler Thromb 2016; 23:128–146. 10.5551/jat.32979
[32]
32. Kim HL, Kim SH. Pulse wave velocity in atherosclerosis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2019; 6:41. 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00041
[33]
33. Itatani K, Sekine T, Yamagishi M, et al. Hemodynamic parameters for cardiovascular system in 4D flow MRI: Mathematical definition and clinical applications. Magn Reson Med Sci 2022; 21:380–399. 10.2463/mrms.rev.2021-0097
[34]
34. Bauernschmitt R, Schulz S, Schwarzhaupt A, et al. Simulation of arterial hemodynamics after partial prosthetic replacement of the aorta. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67:676–682. 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00046-6
[35]
35. Ong CW, Ho P, Leo HL. Effects of microporous stent graft on the descending aortic aneurysm: A patient-specific computational fluid dynamics study. Artif Organs 2016; 40:E230–E240. 10.1111/aor.12802
[36]
36. Yamaguchi T, Amiya E, Watanabe M, Komuro I. Improvement of severe heart failure after endovascular stent grafting for thoracic aortic aneurysm. Int Heart J 2015; 56:682–685. 10.1536/ihj.15-171
[37]
37. Sughimoto K, Takahara Y, Mogi K, et al. Blood flow dynamic improvement with aneurysm repair detected by a patient-specific model of multiple aortic aneurysms. Heart Vessels 2014; 29:404–412. 10.1007/s00380-013-0381-7
[38]
38. Tanaka H, Munakata M, Kawano Y, et al. Comparison between carotid-femoral and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity as measures of arterial stiffness. J Hypertens 2009; 27:2022–2027. 10.1097/hjh.0b013e32832e94e7
[39]
39. Sugawara J, Hayashi K, Yokoi T, et al. Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity: An index of central arterial stiffness? J Hum Hypertens 2005; 19:401–406. 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001838
[40]
40. Park S, Kwon M, Nam H, Huh H. Interpolation time-optimized aortic pulse wave velocity estimation by 4D flow MRI. Sci Rep 2023; 13:16484. 10.1038/s41598-023-43799-z
[41]
41. Nguyen LA, Houriez-Gombaud-Saintonge S, Puymirat E, et al. Aortic stiffness measured from either 2D/4D flow and cine MRI or applanation tonometry in coronary artery disease: A case-control study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:3643. 10.3390/jcm12113643
[42]
42. Jarvis K, Scott MB, Soulat G, et al. Aortic pulse wave velocity evaluated by 4D flow MRI across the adult lifespan. J Magn Reson Imaging 2022; 56:464–473. 10.1002/jmri.28045
Metrics
0
Citations
42
References
Details
Published
Jan 01, 2026
Vol/Issue
25(1)
Pages
n/a
Cite This Article
Shimpei Ikeda, Takahiko Mine, Tetsuro Sekine, et al. (2026). Evaluation of Blood Flow Energy Loss before and after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Using Four-dimensional Flow MR Imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences, 25(1), n/a. https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2025-0031