Abstract
The labeling and the categorizing of cyclists have been occurring for more than a century for a variety of purposes. This study examined a typology developed by the City of Portland, Oregon, that included four categories of cyclists: “the strong and the fearless,” “the enthused and confident,” “the interested but concerned,” and “no way, no how.” Unlike several other typologies, this widely referenced typology was intended to apply to all adults, regardless of their current cycling behavior. An analysis was conducted with data from a random phone survey (n = 908) of adults in the Portland region. Adults were placed into one of the four categories primarily on the basis of their stated comfort level with cycling on a variety of facility types, their interest in cycling as transportation, and their physical ability to bicycle. Nearly all of the sampled population fit clearly into one of the four categories. A majority (56%) of the region's population fit in the interested but concerned category, which was thought to be the key target market to increase the use of cycling as a form of transportation. The analysis indicated that a reduction in traffic speed and an increase in the separation between bicycles and motor vehicles (e.g., cycle tracks) might increase levels of comfort and cycling rates. Women and older adults were underrepresented among the more confident adults and those who currently cycled for transportation.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
34
[1]
Herlihy D. (2004)
[2]
Wilkinson W. C. (1994)
[3]
(1999)
[4]
GellerR. Four Types of Cyclists. Portland Bureau of Transportation, Portland, Ore., 2006. http://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/article/264746. Accessed June 23, 2012.
[5]
MausJ. What Type of Cyclist Are You? BikePortland.Org, Dec. 7, 2006. http://bikeportland.org/2006/12/07/what-type-of-cyclist-are-you-2650. Accessed Nov. 2, 2012.
[6]
HalburT. The Two Types of Bicyclist. Planetizen, June 23, 2009. http://www.planetizen.com/node/39394. Accessed Nov. 2, 2012.
[7]
LydonM. The Bikeway Network. Reconnecting America–Half-Mile Circles blog, February 12, 2012. http://reconnectingamerica.org/news-center/half-mile-circles/2010/the-bikeway-network/. Accessed Nov. 2, 2012.
[8]
Stantec and Vandermark Consulting. City of Cambridge Bikeway Network Plan. The Corporation of the City of Cambridge, Ontario, Canada, 2008. http://www.cambridge.ca/relatedDocs/Cambridge%20Bikeway%20Network%20Master%20Plan.pdf. Accessed Sept. 24, 2013.
[9]
IBI Group. City of Albany Bicycle Master Plan. Final report. Capital District Transportation Committee, Albany, New York, 2009. http://www.cdtcmpo.org/linkage/albanybmp.pdf. Accessed Sept. 24, 2013.
[10]
IBI Group. Cycling Master Plan. City of Burlington, Ontario, Canada, 2010. http://cms.burlington.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?did=14416. Accessed Sept. 24, 2013.
[11]
Alta Planning + Design. City of Palo Alto Bicycle + Pedestrian Transportation Plan. City of Palo Alto, Calif., 2012. http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/31928. Accessed Sept. 24, 2013.
[12]
Los Angeles Department of City Planning. 2010 Bicycle Plan. Publication Council file no. 10-2385-S2, CPC-2009-871-GPA. Department of City Planning, Los Angeles, Calif., 2011. http://planning.lacity.org/cwd/gnlpln/transelt/NewBikePlan/Txt/LA%20CITY%20BICYCLE%20PLAN.pdf. Accessed Sept. 24, 2013.
[13]
Alta Planning + Design. The South Bay Bicycle Master Plan. Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition and South Bay Bicycle Coalition, Calif., 2011. http://www.southbaybicyclecoalition.org/pass-the-plan-action-plan/south-bay-bicycle-master-plan-review-copy/. Accessed Sept. 24, 2013.
[14]
Sunshine Coast Council. Sunshine Coast Active Transport Plan 2011–2031. Sunshine Coast Council, Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia, 2011. http://sunshinecoast.qld.gov.au/addfiles/documents/opof/transport/sc_active_transport_plan_1113.pdf. Accessed Sept. 24, 2013.
[15]
Regional Transportation Commission of Washoe County; Fehr and Peers. Reno Sparks Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Regional Transportation Commission of Washoe County, Reno, Nev., 2011. http://www.rtcwashoe.com/Planning/pdfs/Final%20Master%20Plan.pdf. Accessed Sept. 24, 2013.
[16]
Alta Planning + Design. Lincoln City Walking and Biking Plan, Design and Best Practices Toolkit. Lincoln City, Ore., 2011. http://www.lincolncitypedbike.org/materials/LCWB-Memo3-03302012-Draft.pdf. Accessed Sept. 24, 2013.
[17]
City of Melbourne. Bicycle Plan 2012–2016. City of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 2012. http://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/AboutCouncil/PlansandPublications/strategies/Documents/Bicycle_Plan_2012-16.pdf. Accessed Sept. 24, 2013.
[18]
Regional Transportation Plan 2012–2035, Active Transportation Appendix. Southern California Association of Governments, Los Angeles, Calif., 2012. http://rtpscs.scag.ca.gov/Documents/2012/final/SR/2012fRTP_ActiveTransportation.pdf. Accessed Sept. 24, 2013.
[19]
Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. Houseal Lavigne Associates, and Alta Planning + Design. Main Street Transportation Improvement Feasibility Study. McLean County Regional Planning Commission, Bloomington-Normal, Ill., 2012. https://www.normal.org/DocumentCenter/Home/View/1252. Accessed Sept. 24, 2013.
[20]
Alta Planning + Design. LSCOG Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Study Design Guidelines. Lower Savannah Council of Governments, Savannah, Ga., 2012. http://www.lscog.org/Resources/504.pdf. Accessed Sept. 24, 2013.
[21]
Seattle Bicycle Master Plan. Draft report. Seattle Department of Transportation, Seattle, Wash., 2012. http://www.seattle.gov/transportation/docs/bmp/2013/SBMP%20Complete%206%205%202013%202%20pm.pdf. Accessed Sept. 24, 2013.
[22]
Hargroup Management Consultants. Cycling Strategy Research: Public Telephone Survey. City of Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 2011. http://www.calgary.ca/Transportation/TP/Documents/cycling/cycling_strategy/telephone_survey.pdf. Accessed Sept. 24, 2013.
[23]
Seattle Bike Master Plan Progress Report. Seattle Department of Transportation, Seattle, Wash., 2012. http://www.seattle.gov/transportation/docs/bmp/BMP%20Progress%20Report%202012.pdf. Accessed Sept. 24, 2013.
[28]
Christmas S. (2010)
[30]
(2011)
[31]
Garrard J. (2012)
[32]
Buehler R. (2012)
Metrics
240
Citations
34
References
Details
Published
Jan 01, 2013
Vol/Issue
2387(1)
Pages
129-138
License
View
Cite This Article
Jennifer Dill, Nathan McNeil (2013). Four Types of Cyclists?. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2387(1), 129-138. https://doi.org/10.3141/2387-15
Related

You May Also Like

Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis

Reid Ewing, Robert Cervero · 2001

1,338 citations

General Lane-Changing Model MOBIL for Car-Following Models

Arne Kesting, Martin Treiber · 2007

1,086 citations

Real-World Carbon Dioxide Impacts of Traffic Congestion

Matthew Barth, Kanok Boriboonsomsin · 2008

535 citations

Calibrating Car-Following Models by Using Trajectory Data

Arne Kesting, Martin Treiber · 2008

405 citations