journal article Mar 01, 2021

How long is the tail end of the learning curve? Results from 1000 consecutive endoscopic endonasal skull base cases following the initial 200 cases

View at Publisher Save 10.3171/2019.12.jns192600
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) to the skull base have evolved over the last 20 years to become an essential component of a comprehensive skull base practice. Many case series show a learning curve from the earliest cases, in which the authors were inexperienced or were not using advanced closure techniques. It is generally accepted that once this learning curve is achieved, a plateau is reached with little incremental improvement. Cases performed during the early steep learning curve were eliminated to examine whether the continued improvement exists over the “tail end” of the curve.


METHODS
A prospectively acquired database of all EEA cases performed by the senior authors at Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital was reviewed. The first 200 cases were eliminated and the next 1000 consecutive cases were examined to avoid the bias created by the early learning curve.


RESULTS
Of the 1000 cases, the most common pathologies included pituitary adenoma (51%), meningoencephalocele or CSF leak repair (8.6%), meningioma (8.4%), craniopharyngioma (7.3%), basilar invagination (3.1%), Rathke’s cleft cyst (2.8%), and chordoma (2.4%). Use of lumbar drains decreased from the first half to the second half of our series (p <0.05) as did the authors’ use of fat alone (p <0.005) or gasket alone (p <0.005) for dural closure, while the use of a nasoseptal flap increased (p <0.005). Although mean tumor diameter was constant (on average), gross-total resection (GTR) increased from 60% in the first half to 73% in the second half (p <0.005). GTR increased for all pathologies but most significantly for chordoma (56% vs 100%, p <0.05), craniopharyngioma (47% vs 0.71%, p <0.05) and pituitary adenoma (67% vs 75%, p <0.05). Hormonal cure for secreting adenomas also increased from 83% in the first half to 89% in the second half (p <0.05). The rate of any complication was unchanged at 6.4% in the first half and 6.2% in the latter half of cases, and vascular injury occurred in only 0.6% of cases. Postoperative CSF leak occurred in 2% of cases and was unchanged between the first and second half of the series.


CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrates that contrary to popular belief, the surgical learning curve does not plateau but can continue for several years depending on the complexity of the endpoints considered. These findings may have implications for clinical trial design, surgical education, and patient safety measures.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
90
[1]
Bokhari MB, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, Ragupathi M, Haas EM: Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 25:855–860, 20112073408110.1007/s00464-010-1281-x 10.1007/s00464-010-1281-x
[2]
Casanueva FF, Barkan AL, Buchfelder M, Klibanski A, Laws ER, Loeffler JS, : Criteria for the definition of Pituitary Tumor Centers of Excellence (PTCOE): a Pituitary Society statement. Pituitary 20:489–498, 20172888441510.1007/s11102-017-0838-2 10.1007/s11102-017-0838-2
[3]
Cohen S, Jones SH, Dhandapani S, Negm HM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH: Lumbar drains decrease the risk of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak following endonasal endoscopic surgery for suprasellar meningiomas in patients with high body mass index. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 14:66–71, 20182925328410.1093/ons/opx070 10.1093/ons/opx070
[4]
Conger A, Zhao F, Wang X, Eisenberg A, Griffiths C, Esposito F, : Evolution of the graded repair of CSF leaks and skull base defects in endonasal endoscopic tumor surgery: trends in repair failure and meningitis rates in 509 patients. J Neurosurg 130:861–875, 20182974992010.3171/2017.11.JNS172141 10.3171/2017.11.jns172141
[5]
Ding H, Gu Y, Zhang X, Xie T, Liu T, Hu F, : Learning curve for the endoscopic endonasal approach for suprasellar craniopharyngiomas. J Clin Neurosci 42:209–216, 20172851197110.1016/j.jocn.2017.04.021 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.04.021
[6]
Foo CC, Law WL: The learning curve of robotic-assisted low rectal resection of a novice rectal surgeon. World J Surg 40:456–462, 20162642367410.1007/s00268-015-3251-x 10.1007/s00268-015-3251-x
[7]
Forbes N, Mohamed R, Raman M: Learning curve for endoscopy training: is it all about numbers? Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 30:349–356, 20162734564410.1016/j.bpg.2016.04.003 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.04.003
[8]
Garcia-Navarro V, Anand VK, Schwartz TH: Gasket seal closure for extended endonasal endoscopic skull base surgery: efficacy in a large case series. World Neurosurg 80:563–568, 201310.1016/j.wneu.2011.08.034 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.08.034
[9]
Hopper AN, Jamison MH, Lewis WG: Learning curves in surgical practice. Postgrad Med J 83:777–779, 20071805717910.1136/pgmj.2007.057190 10.1136/pgmj.2007.057190
[10]
Jakimovski D, Bonci G, Attia M, Shao H, Hofstetter C, Tsiouris AJ, : Incidence and significance of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak in endoscopic pituitary surgery using intrathecal fluorescein. World Neurosurg 82:e513–e523, 20142381106810.1016/j.wneu.2013.06.005 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.06.005
[11]
Jiménez-Rodríguez RM, Díaz-Pavón JM, de la Portilla de Juan F, Prendes-Sillero E, Dussort HC, Padillo J: Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:815–821, 20132324227010.1007/s00384-012-1620-6 10.1007/s00384-012-1620-6
[12]
Kassam AB, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Thomas A, Gardner P, : Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: analysis of complications in the authors’ initial 800 patients. J Neurosurg 114:1544–1568, 201110.3171/2010.10.JNS09406 10.3171/2010.10.jns09406
[13]
Khan N, Abboudi H, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K: Measuring the surgical ‘learning curve’: methods, variables and competency. BJU Int 113:504–508, 20142381946110.1111/bju.12197 10.1111/bju.12197
[14]
Khan OH, Anand VK, Schwartz TH: Endoscopic endonasal resection of skull base meningiomas: the significance of a “cortical cuff” and brain edema compared with careful case selection and surgical experience in predicting morbidity and extent of resection. Neurosurg Focus 37(4):E7, 201425465040
[15]
Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH: The endoscope-assisted ventral approach compared with open microscope-assisted surgery for clival chordomas. World Neurosurg 76:318–327, 259–262, 20112198643110.1016/j.wneu.2011.02.026 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.02.026
[16]
Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH: Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of craniopharyngiomas. World Neurosurg 77:329–341, 20122250102010.1016/j.wneu.2011.07.011 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.07.011
[17]
Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH: Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of giant pituitary adenomas. Pituitary 15:150–159, 20122203803310.1007/s11102-011-0359-3 10.1007/s11102-011-0359-3
[18]
Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH: Endoscopic endonasal versus open transcranial resection of anterior midline skull base meningiomas. World Neurosurg 77:713–724, 20122212029610.1016/j.wneu.2011.08.025 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.08.025
[19]
Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH: Endoscopic skull base surgery: a comprehensive comparison with open transcranial approaches. Br J Neurosurg 26:637–648, 20122232443710.3109/02688697.2012.654837 10.3109/02688697.2012.654837
[20]
Koutourousiou M, Gardner PA, Tormenti MJ, Henry SL, Stefko ST, Kassam AB, : Endoscopic endonasal approach for resection of cranial base chordomas: outcomes and learning curve. Neurosurgery 71:614–625, 20122259232810.1227/NEU.0b013e31825ea3e0 10.1227/neu.0b013e31825ea3e0
[21]
Kshettry VR, Do H, Elshazly K, Farrell CJ, Nyquist G, Rosen M, : The learning curve in endoscopic endonasal resection of craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurg Focus 41(6):E9, 20162790311910.3171/2016.9.FOCUS16292 10.3171/2016.9.focus16292
[22]
Kubat E, Hansen N, Nguyen H, Wren SM, Eisenberg D: Urgent and elective robotic single-site cholecystectomy: analysis and learning curve of 150 consecutive cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26:185–191, 20162675671510.1089/lap.2015.0528 10.1089/lap.2015.0528
[23]
Lau D, Hervey-Jumper SL, Han SJ, Berger MS: Intraoperative perception and estimates on extent of resection during awake glioma surgery: overcoming the learning curve. J Neurosurg 128:1410–1418, 20182873140110.3171/2017.1.JNS161811 10.3171/2017.1.jns161811
[24]
Leng LZ, Brown S, Anand VK, Schwartz TH: “Gasket-seal” watertight closure in minimal-access endoscopic cranial base surgery. Neurosurgery 62:ONSE342–ONSE343, 200818596534
[25]
Mascarenhas L, Moshel YA, Bayad F, Szentirmai O, Salek AA, Leng LZ, : The transplanum transtuberculum approaches for suprasellar and sellar-suprasellar lesions: avoidance of cerebrospinal fluid leak and lessons learned. World Neurosurg 82:186–195, 20142340335510.1016/j.wneu.2013.02.032 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.02.032
[26]
McCoul ED, Anand VK, Singh A, Nyquist GG, Schaberg MR, Schwartz TH: Long-term effectiveness of a reconstructive protocol using the nasoseptal flap after endoscopic skull base surgery. World Neurosurg 81:136–143, 20142302264410.1016/j.wneu.2012.08.011 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.08.011
[27]
Nix P, Alavi SA, Tyagi A, Phillips N: Endoscopic repair of the anterior skull base—is there a learning curve? Br J Neurosurg 32:407–411, 201810.1080/02688697.2018.1478062 10.1080/02688697.2018.1478062
[28]
Nyquist GG, Anand VK, Singh A, Schwartz TH: Janus flap: bilateral nasoseptal flaps for anterior skull base reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 142:327–331, 20102017237510.1016/j.otohns.2009.12.020 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.12.020
[29]
Oomen M, Bakx R, Peeters B, Boersma D, Wijnen M, Heij H: Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy, the tail of the learning curve. Surg Endosc 27:3705–3709, 20132358482110.1007/s00464-013-2951-2 10.1007/s00464-013-2951-2
[30]
Ottenhausen M, Banu MA, Placantonakis DG, Tsiouris AJ, Khan OH, Anand VK, : Endoscopic endonasal resection of suprasellar meningiomas: the importance of case selection and experience in determining extent of resection, visual improvement, and complications. World Neurosurg 82:442–449, 20142465725410.1016/j.wneu.2014.03.032 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.03.032
[31]
Patel KS, Komotar RJ, Szentirmai O, Moussazadeh N, Raper DM, Starke RM, : Case-specific protocol to reduce cerebrospinal fluid leakage after endonasal endoscopic surgery. J Neurosurg 119:661–668, 20132372498510.3171/2013.4.JNS13124 10.3171/2013.4.jns13124
[32]
Pernar LIM, Robertson FC, Tavakkoli A, Sheu EG, Brooks DC, Smink DS: An appraisal of the learning curve in robotic general surgery. Surg Endosc 31:4583–4596, 20172841134510.1007/s00464-017-5520-2 10.1007/s00464-017-5520-2
[33]
Qureshi T, Chaus F, Fogg L, Dasgupta M, Straus D, Byrne RW: Learning curve for the transsphenoidal endoscopic endonasal approach to pituitary tumors. Br J Neurosurg 30:637–642, 20162733296910.1080/02688697.2016.1199786 10.1080/02688697.2016.1199786
[34]
Schwartz TH, Fraser JF, Brown S, Tabaee A, Kacker A, Anand VK: Endoscopic cranial base surgery: classification of operative approaches. Neurosurgery 62:991–1005, 200818580797
[35]
Schwartz TH, Morgenstern PF, Anand VK: Lessons learned in the evolution of endoscopic skull base surgery. J Neurosurg 130:337–346, 20193071703510.3171/2018.10.JNS182154 10.3171/2018.10.jns182154
[36]
Shakir M, Boone BA, Polanco PM, Zenati MS, Hogg ME, Tsung A, : The learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy: an analysis of outcomes of the first 100 consecutive cases at a high-volume pancreatic centre. HPB 17:580–586, 201510.1111/hpb.12412 10.1111/hpb.12412
[37]
Shikary T, Andaluz N, Meinzen-Derr J, Edwards C, Theodosopoulos P, Zimmer LA: Operative learning curve after transition to endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. World Neurosurg 102:608–612, 20172830071510.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.008 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.008
[38]
Sng KK, Hara M, Shin JW, Yoo BE, Yang KS, Kim SH: The multiphasic learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgery. Surg Endosc 27:3297–3307, 20132350881810.1007/s00464-013-2909-4 10.1007/s00464-013-2909-4
[39]
Snyderman C, Kassam A, Carrau R, Mintz A, Gardner P, Prevedello DM: Acquisition of surgical skills for endonasal skull base surgery: a training program. Laryngoscope 117:699–705, 20071733426310.1097/MLG.0b013e318031c817 10.1097/mlg.0b013e318031c817
[40]
Subramonian K, Muir G: The ‘learning curve’ in surgery: what is it, how do we measure it and can we influence it? BJU Int 93:1173–1174, 200410.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04891.x 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2004.04891.x
[41]
Tabaee A, Anand VK, Brown SM, Lin JW, Schwartz TH: Algorithm for reconstruction after endoscopic pituitary and skull base surgery. Laryngoscope 117:1133–1137, 20071748602210.1097/MLG.0b013e31805c08c5 10.1097/mlg.0b013e31805c08c5
[42]
Voitk AJ, Tsao SG, Ignatius S: The tail of the learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 182:250–253, 20011158768610.1016/S0002-9610(01)00699-7 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00699-7
[43]
Wright T: Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. J Aeronaut Sci 3:122–128, 193610.2514/8.155 10.2514/8.155
[44]
Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Sato S, Yamakawa Y, Kagawa H, : Learning curve for robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: use of the cumulative sum method. Surg Endosc 29:1679–1685, 20152527747710.1007/s00464-014-3855-5 10.1007/s00464-014-3855-5
[45]
Zwagerman NT, Wang EW, Shin SS, Chang YF, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Snyderman CH, : Does lumbar drainage reduce postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery? A prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg 131:1172–1178, 201910.3171/2018.4.JNS172447 10.3171/2018.4.jns172447
[46]
Bokhari MB, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, Ragupathi M, Haas EM: Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 25:855–860, 20112073408110.1007/s00464-010-1281-x 10.1007/s00464-010-1281-x
[47]
Casanueva FF, Barkan AL, Buchfelder M, Klibanski A, Laws ER, Loeffler JS, : Criteria for the definition of Pituitary Tumor Centers of Excellence (PTCOE): a Pituitary Society statement. Pituitary 20:489–498, 20172888441510.1007/s11102-017-0838-2 10.1007/s11102-017-0838-2
[48]
Cohen S, Jones SH, Dhandapani S, Negm HM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH: Lumbar drains decrease the risk of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak following endonasal endoscopic surgery for suprasellar meningiomas in patients with high body mass index. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 14:66–71, 20182925328410.1093/ons/opx070 10.1093/ons/opx070
[49]
Conger A, Zhao F, Wang X, Eisenberg A, Griffiths C, Esposito F, : Evolution of the graded repair of CSF leaks and skull base defects in endonasal endoscopic tumor surgery: trends in repair failure and meningitis rates in 509 patients. J Neurosurg 130:861–875, 20182974992010.3171/2017.11.JNS172141 10.3171/2017.11.jns172141
[50]
Ding H, Gu Y, Zhang X, Xie T, Liu T, Hu F, : Learning curve for the endoscopic endonasal approach for suprasellar craniopharyngiomas. J Clin Neurosci 42:209–216, 20172851197110.1016/j.jocn.2017.04.021 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.04.021

Showing 50 of 90 references

Metrics
58
Citations
90
References
Details
Published
Mar 01, 2021
Vol/Issue
134(3)
Pages
750-760
Cite This Article
Iyan Younus, Mina M. Gerges, Rafael Uribe-Cardenas, et al. (2021). How long is the tail end of the learning curve? Results from 1000 consecutive endoscopic endonasal skull base cases following the initial 200 cases. Journal of Neurosurgery, 134(3), 750-760. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.12.jns192600