Mature and old-growth forests contribute to large-scale conservation targets in the conterminous United States

Dominick A. DellaSala; Brendan Mackey; Patrick Norman; Carly Campbell; Patrick J. Comer; Cyril F. Kormos; Heather Keith; Brendan Rogers

doi:10.3389/ffgc.2022.979528

journal article Open Access Sep 28, 2022

Mature and old-growth forests contribute to large-scale conservation targets in the conterminous United States

Dominick A. DellaSala Brendan Mackey

Patrick Norman

Carly Campbell

Patrick J. Comer Cyril F. Kormos Heather Keith

Brendan Rogers

Frontiers in Forests and Global Change Vol. 5 · Frontiers Media SA

View at Publisher Save 10.3389/ffgc.2022.979528

Abstract

Mature and old-growth forests (MOG) of the conterminous United States collectively support exceptional levels of biodiversity but have declined substantially from logging and development. National-scale proposals to protect 30 and 50% of all lands and waters are useful in assessing MOG conservation targets given the precarious status of these forests. We present the first coast to coast spatially explicit MOG assessment based on three structural development measures—canopy height, canopy cover, and above-ground living biomass to assess relative maturity. MOG were displayed by major forest types (n = 22), landownerships (federal, state, private, and tribal), and Gap Analysis Project (GAP) management status overlaid on the NatureServe’s Red-listed Ecosystems and species, above-ground living biomass, and drinking water source areas. MOG total ∼67.2 M ha (35.9%) of all forest structural classes and were scattered across 8 regions with most in western regions. All federal lands combined represented the greatest (35%) concentrations of MOG, ∼92% of which is on national forest lands with ∼9% on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and ∼3% on national park lands (totals do not sum to 100% due to minor mapping errors in the datasets). MOG on national forest lands supported the highest concentration of conservation values. However, national forests and BLM lands did not meet lower bound (30%) targets with only ∼24% of MOG in GAP1,2 (5.9 M ha) protection status. The vast majority (76%, 20.8 M ha) of MOG on federal lands that store 10.64 Gt CO2 (e) are vulnerable to logging (GAP3). If federal MOG are logged over a decade, and half their carbon stock emitted, there would be an estimated 0.5 ppm increase in atmospheric CO2 by 2030, which is equivalent to ∼9% of United States total annual emissions. We recommend upper bound (100%) protection of federal MOG, including elevating the conservation status of Inventoried Roadless Areas. This would avoid substantial CO2 emissions while allowing ongoing carbon sequestration to act as natural climate solutions to aid compliance with the Paris Climate Agreement and presidential executive orders on MOG and 30% of all lands and waters in protection by 2030. On non-federal lands, which have fewer MOG, regulatory improvements and conservation incentives are needed.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

87

[1]

Alverson Wild Forests: Conservation Biology and Public Policy. (1994)

[2]

Bader "Distribution of grizzly bears in the U.S. Northern Rockies." Northwest Sci. (2000)

[3]

Betts "Old-growth forests buffer climate-sensitive bird populations from warming." Divers. Distrib. (2017) 10.1111/ddi.12688

[4]

Brown "Aboveground biomass distribution of US eastern hardwood forests and the use of large trees as an indicator of forest development." For. Ecol. Manag. (1997) 10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00044-3

[5]

Butler "Family forest ownerships of the United States, 2013: Findings from the USDA Forest Service’s National Woodland Owner survey." J. For. (2016) 10.5849/jof.15-099

[6]

Cannon "Old and ancient trees are life history lottery winners and vital evolutionary resources for long-term adaptive capacity." Nat. Plants (2022) 10.1038/s41477-021-01088-5

[7]

Carleton "Old growth in the Great Lakes forest." Environ. Rev. (2003) 10.1139/a03-009

[8]

Carroll "How percentage-protected targets can support positive biodiversity outcomes" Conserv. Biol (2021) 10.1111/cobi.13869

[9]

Carroll "Maximizing the effectiveness of national commitments to protected area expansion for conserving biodiversity and ecosystem carbon under climate change." Glob. Change Biol. (2021) 10.1111/gcb.15645

[10]

Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center – Conversion Tables. (1990)

[11]

Comer "Documenting at-risk status of terrestrial ecosystems in temperate and tropical North America." Conserv. Sci. Pract. (2022) 10.1111/csp2.603

[12]

Crampe "Fifty years of runoff response to conversion of old-growth forest to planted forest in the J.J. Andrews Forest, Oregon, USA." Hydrol. Process. (2021) 10.1002/hyp.14168

[13]

Davis Eastern old-Growth Forests. Prospects for Rediscovery and Recovery. (1996)

[14]

De Frenne "Microclimate moderates plant responses to macroclimate warming." Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (2013) 10.1073/pnas.1311190110

[15]

DellaSala "Climate Change May Trigger Broad Shifts in North America’s Pacific Coastal Rainforests" Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences (2015)

[16]

DellaSala Temperate And Boreal Rainforests Of The World: Ecology And Conservation. (2011) 10.5822/978-1-61091-008-8

[17]

DellaSala "The Tongass National Forest, southeast Alaska, USA: A natural climate solution of global significance." Land (2022) 10.3390/land11050717

[18]

DellaSala "Primary forests are undervalued in the climate emergency." Bioscience (2020) 10.1093/biosci/biaa030

[19]

Dinerstein "A global deal for nature: Guiding principles, milestones, and targets." Sci. Adv. (2019) 10.1126/sciadv.aaw2869

[20]

Dreiss "Identifying key federal, stage, and private lands strategies for achieving 30 x 30 in the United States" Conserv. Lett (2022) 10.1111/conl.12849

[21]

Ducey "Late-successional and old-growth forests in the northeastern United States: Structure, dynamics, and prospects for restoration." Forests (2013) 10.3390/f4041055

[22]

Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program of the USDA Forest Service. Research and Development Deputy Area of the U.S. (2022)

[23]

Franklin "Spatial aspects of structure complexity in old-growth forests." J. For. (2004)

[24]

Frey "Spatial models reveal the microclimatic buffering capacity of old-growth forests." Sci. Adv. (2016) 10.1126/sciadv.1501392

[25]

Gorelick "Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone." Remote Sens. Environ. (2017) 10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031

[26]

Griscom "Natural climate solutions." Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (2017) 10.1073/pnas.1710465114

[27]

Gunn "Late-successional and old-growth forest carbon temporal dynamics in the Northern Forest (Northeastern USA)." For. Ecol. Manag. (2013) 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.10.023

[28]

Hanberry "Recalling open old growth forests in the southeastern mixed forest province of the United States." Ecoscience. (2018) 10.1080/1195860.2018.1499282

[29]

High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change

M. C. Hansen, Peter Potapov, R. Moore et al.

Science 2013 10.1126/science.1244693

[30]

Harris "Global maps of twenty-first century forest carbon fluxes." Nat. Clim. Change (2021) 10.1038/s41558-020-00976-6

[31]

Heilman "Forest fragmentation of the conterminous United States: Assessing forest intactness through road density and spatial characteristics." Bioscience (2002) 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0411:ffotcu]2.0.co;2

[32]

Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation And Vulnerability. (2022)

[33]

Policy On Primary Forests And Intact Forest Landscapes. (2020)

[34]

Kauffman "Defining old growth for fire-adapted forests of the western United States." Ecol. Soc. (2007) 10.5751/es-02169-120215

[35]

Kauffman Old-growth forests in the southwest and Rocky Mountain Regions Proceedings of a Workshop. (1992) 10.2737/rm-gtr-213

[36]

Keith "Managing temperate forests for carbon storage: Impacts of logging versus forest protection on carbon stocks." Ecosphere (2014) 10.1890/es14-00051.1

[37]

Keith "Estimating carbon carrying capacity in natural forest ecosystems across heterogenous landscapes: Addressing sources of error." Glob. Change Biol. (2010) 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02146.x

[38]

Keith "Evaluating the mitigation effectectiveness of forests managed for conservation versus commodity production using an Australian example." Conserv. Lett. (2022) 10.1111/conl.12878

[39]

Keith "Re-evaluation of forest biomass carbon stocks and lessons from the world’s most carbon-dense forests." Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (2009) 10.1073/pnas.0901970106

[40]

Krankina "High biomass forests of the Pacific Northwest: Who manages them and how much is protected?" Environ. Manag. (2014) 10.1007/s00267-014-0283-1

[41]

LF 2016 Maps. (2016)

[42]

Law "Strategic forest reserves can protect biodiversity in the western United States and mitigate climate change." Commun. Earth Environ. (2021) 10.1038/s43247-021-00326-0

[43]

Law "Creating strategic reserves to protect forest carbon and reduce biodiversity losses in the United States." Land (2022) 10.3390/land11050721

[44]

The Unseen Effects of Deforestation: Biophysical Effects on Climate

Deborah Lawrence, Michael Coe, Wayne Walker et al.

Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 2022 10.3389/ffgc.2022.756115

[45]

Leak Historical (1899) Age and Structural Characteristics of an Old-Growth Northern Hardwood Stand in New York State. Res. Note NRS-144. (2012) 10.2737/nrs-rn-144

[46]

Lesmeister "Northern spotted owl nesting forests as fire refugia: A 30-year synthesis of large wildfires." Fire Ecol. (2021) 10.1186/s42408-021-00118-z

[47]

Lindenmayer "Global decline in large old trees." Science (2012) 10.1126/science.1231070

[48]

Lindenmayer "New policies for old trees: Averting a global crisis in a keystone ecological structure." Conserv. Lett. (2014) 10.1111/conl.12013

[49]

Lutz "Global importance of large-diameter trees." Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. (2018) 10.1111/geb.12747

[50]

Luyssaert "Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks." Nature (2008) 10.1038/nature07276

Showing 50 of 87 references

Cited By

47

Scientific Definitions and Measurements of Second-Growth, Mature, and Old-Growth Forests

Ethan A. Frye, Carolyn A. Copenheaver · 2025

Journal of Forestry

Definition criteria determine the success of old-growth mapping

Jamis M. Bruening, Ralph O. Dubayah · 2024

Ecological Indicators

Classifying mature federal forests in the United States: The forest inventory growth stage system

C.W. Woodall, A.G. Kamoske · 2023

Forest Ecology and Management

Anthropogenically-induced range expansion as an invasion front in native species: An example in North American flying squirrels

Corinne A. Diggins · 2023

Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

Using ecosystem integrity to maximize climate mitigation and minimize risk in international forest policy

Brendan M. Rogers, Brendan Mackey · 2022

Frontiers in Forests and Global Cha...

Metrics

47

Citations

87

References

Details

Published: Sep 28, 2022
Vol/Issue: 5
License: View

Authors

D

Dominick A. DellaSala

Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology (IFM), Linköping University, SE-58 583 Linköping, Sweden

C

Carly Campbell

5Bicycle Therapeutics, Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts.

Cite This Article

Dominick A. DellaSala, Brendan Mackey, Patrick Norman, et al. (2022). Mature and old-growth forests contribute to large-scale conservation targets in the conterminous United States. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2022.979528

Mature and old-growth forests contribute to large-scale conservation targets in the conterminous United States

You May Also Like