journal article Open Access Mar 28, 2026

Advancing Guidelines for the Design of Tooth-Supported Surgical Guides with Free-End Configurations: A Simulation Study of the Influence of Surgeon’s Hand Force

Applied Sciences Vol. 16 No. 7 pp. 3287 · MDPI AG
View at Publisher Save 10.3390/app16073287
Abstract
Numerous studies have demonstrated that tooth-supported dental guides improve the accuracy of implant placement. However, current manufacturing procedures and available materials are not yet optimal and may still lead to deviations from the planned implant position. The influence of the surgeon’s manual force on the deformation of dental guides during implant placement has not yet been sufficiently investigated. Therefore, this study evaluates the mechanical behavior of dental guides using finite element analysis (FEA) in order to assess the influence of the surgeon’s hand force during clinical application. Finite element simulations of deformation and stress were performed for four types of tooth-supported dental guides, including cantilever dental guides with free ends and beam-type guides with a large span between the supporting teeth. The manual force applied by the surgeon was arbitrarily set to 30 N. Simulations were conducted for five commonly used biocompatible polymer materials: Stratasys MED610, VeroGlaze MED620, EOS PA2200, Formlabs FLSGAM01, and Stratasys ULTEM 1010. The numerical results quantified the deformation of dental guides caused by the applied manual force during surgical manipulation. For all analyzed guide designs, the deflection was primarily influenced by the arm length, i.e., the distance between the support and the point of force application. Based on the obtained results, design diagrams were developed to provide guidelines for the design of beam-type (A and A1) and cantilever-type (B and B1) tooth-supported dental guides.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
33
[1]
Falcinelli "Finite element analysis in implant dentistry: State of the art and future directions" Dent. Mater. (2023) 10.1016/j.dental.2023.04.002
[2]
Mariani "Three-dimensional accuracy of surgical guides for static computer-aided implant surgery: A systematic review" Prosthesis (2023) 10.3390/prosthesis5030057
[3]
Raffa "Stress shielding at the bone–implant interface: Influence of surface roughness and bone–implant contact ratio" Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. (2020)
[4]
Varun "Finite element analysis of dental implant surgical guides" Mater. Today Proc. (2022)
[5]
Ghionea, I.G., Burlacu-Vatamanu, O.E., Cristescu, A.M., David, M., Stancu, I.C., Butnarasu, C., and Cristache, C.M. (2023). A finite element analysis of a tooth-supported 3D-printed surgical guide without metallic sleeves for dental implant insertion. Appl. Sci., 13. 10.3390/app13179975
[6]
Abad Coronel, C., Vandeweghe, S., Vela Cervantes, M.D., Lara, M.J.T., Córdova, N.M., and Aliaga, P. (2024). Accuracy of implant placement using digital prosthetically derived surgical guides: A systematic review. Appl. Sci., 14. 10.3390/app14167422
[7]
Schneider "A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template-based implant dentistry" Clin. Oral Implant. Res. (2009) 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01788.x
[8]
Tahmaseb "Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: A systematic review" Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. (2014) 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g1.2
[9]
Vercruyssen "Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement" Clin. Oral Implant. Res. (2012) 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02552.x
[10]
Shi "A systematic review of the accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implantation" Int. J. Implant Dent. (2023) 10.1186/s40729-023-00507-w
[11]
Márquez Bautista, N., Meniz-García, C., López-Carriches, C., Sánchez-Labrador, L., Brinkmann, J.C.-B., and Martínez-Pereda, C.M. (2024). Accuracy of different systems of guided implant surgery and methods for quantification: A systematic review. Appl. Sci., 14. 10.3390/app142411479
[12]
Azevedo, M., Correia, F., and Almeida, R.F. (2024). Accuracy of implant guided surgery in fully edentulous patients: Prediction vs. actual outcome—A systematic review. J. Clin. Med., 13. 10.3390/jcm13175178
[13]
Komiyama "Accuracy and Complications Using Computer-Designed Stereolithographic Surgical Guides for Oral Rehabilitation by Means of Dental Implants: A Review of the Literature" Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. (2012) 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00275.x
[14]
Tahmaseb "The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis" Clin. Oral Implant. Res. (2018) 10.1111/clr.13346
[15]
Hultin "Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: A systematic review" Clin. Oral Implant. Res. (2012) 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02545.x
[16]
Kim "Accuracy of a simplified 3D-printed implant surgical guide" J. Prosthet. Dent. (2020) 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.006
[17]
Fotopoulos "Accuracy of dental implant placement with 3D-printed surgical templates by using Implant Studio and MGUIDE. An observational study" Int. J. Comput. Dent. (2022)
[18]
Wu "Study the design parameters of 3D printing surgical guide deformation quantity by disinfection and sterilization" J. Ind. Prod. Eng. (2021)
[19]
Kobe "Retentive design of a small surgical guide for implant surgery: An in vitro study" J. Dent. (2023) 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104384
[20]
Miljanovic "Novel and accurate 3D-printed surgical guide for mandibular reconstruction with integrated dental implants" Comput. Biol. Med. (2022) 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106327
[21]
Lin, C.-C., Ishikawa, M., Maida, T., Cheng, H.-C., Ou, K.-L., Nezu, T., and Endo, K. (2020). Stereolithographic surgical guide with combination tooth and bone support: Accuracy of guided implant surgery in distal extension situations. J. Clin. Med., 9. 10.3390/jcm9030709
[22]
Stratasys Ltd. (2026, March 12). MED610 Biocompatible Photopolymer Material Datasheet. Available online: https://www.stratasys.com/en/dental/materials/med-610/.
[23]
EOS GmbH (2026, March 12). PA 2200 Material Data Sheet. Available online: https://www.eos.info/polymer-solutions/polymer-materials/data-sheets/mds-pa-2200.
[24]
Formlabs Inc. (2026, March 12). Surgical Guide Resin Technical Data Sheet. Available online: https://formlabs-media.formlabs.com/datasheets/surgical_guide_technical_data_sheet_en.pdf.
[25]
Stratasys Ltd. (2026, March 12). ULTEM™ 1010 Resin Material Datasheet. Available online: https://www.stratasys.com/en/materials/materials-catalog/fdm-materials/ultem-1010/.
[26]
Stratasys Ltd. (2026, March 12). VeroGlaze™ MED620 Biocompatible Photopolymer Material Datasheet. Available online: https://www.stratasys.com/en/dental/materials/med-620/.
[27]
"Preoperative analysis of the stability of fit of a patient-specific surgical guide" Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. (2015) 10.1080/10255842.2013.774383
[28]
Elias "The magnitude of cutting forces at high speed" J. Prosthet. Dent. (2003) 10.1067/mpr.2003.35
[29]
Nagib, R., Farkas, A.Z., and Szuhanek, C. (2023). Finite Element Analysis of Individualized Polymeric 3D-Printed Guide for Orthodontic Mini-Implant Insertion as Temporary Crown Support in the Anterior Maxillary Area. Polymers, 15. 10.3390/polym15040879
[30]
Pupulin "On the Thermal Impact during Drilling Operations in Guided Dental Surgery: An Experimental and Numerical Investigation" J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. (2024) 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106327
[31]
Liu "Numerical and Experimental Analyses on the Temperature Distribution in the Dental Implant Preparation Area When Using a Surgical Guide" J. Prosthodont. (2018) 10.1111/jopr.12488
[32]
Aksoy "Fabrication of Customized Dental Guide by Stereolithography Method and Evaluation of Dimensional Accuracy with Artificial Neural Networks" J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. (2022) 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105071
[33]
Chu "Effect of Drill Handle Force Applied to Digital Surgical Guides on Implant Deviation: An In Vitro Study" Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. (2025) 10.1111/cid.70089
Metrics
0
Citations
33
References
Details
Published
Mar 28, 2026
Vol/Issue
16(7)
Pages
3287
License
View
Cite This Article
Nikola Šimunić, Vladimir Tudić, Josip Hoster, et al. (2026). Advancing Guidelines for the Design of Tooth-Supported Surgical Guides with Free-End Configurations: A Simulation Study of the Influence of Surgeon’s Hand Force. Applied Sciences, 16(7), 3287. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16073287