journal article Open Access Apr 01, 2023

The Effect of Direct-Fed Microbials on In-Vitro Rumen Fermentation of Grass or Maize Silage

Fermentation Vol. 9 No. 4 pp. 347 · MDPI AG
View at Publisher Save 10.3390/fermentation9040347
Abstract
Direct-fed microbial products (DFM) are probiotics that can be used advantageously in ruminant production. The in vitro gas production technique (IVGPT) is a method to simulate rumen fermentation and can be used to measure degradation, gas production, and products of fermentation of such additives. However, inter-laboratory differences have been reported. Therefore, tests using the same material were used to validate laboratory reproducibility. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of adding two DFM formulations on fermentation kinetics, methane (CH4) production, and feed degradation in two different basal feeds while validating a newly established IVGPT laboratory. Six treatments, with three replicates each, were tested simultaneously at the established IVGPT lab at the University of Copenhagen, and the new IVGPT lab at Chr. Hansen Laboratories. Maize silage (MS) and grass silage (GS) were fermented with and without the following DFM: P1: Ligilactobacillus animalis and Propionibacterium freudenreichii (total 1.5 × 107 CFU/mL), P2: P1 with added Bacillus subtilis and B. licheniformis (total 5.9 × 107 CFU/mL). The DFM were anaerobically incubated in rumen fluid and buffer with freeze-dried silage samples for 48 h. Total gas production (TGP: mL at Standard Temperature and Pressure/gram of organic matter), pH, organic matter degradability (dOM), CH4concentration (MC) and yield (MY), and volatile fatty acid (VFA) production and profiles were measured after fermentation. No significant differences between the laboratories were detected for any response variables. The dOM of MS (78.3%) was significantly less than GS (81.4%), regardless of the DFM added (P1 and P2). There were no significant differences between the effects of the DFM within the feed type. MS produced significantly more gas than GS after 48 h, but GS with DFM produced significantly more gas at 3 and 9 h and a similar gas volume at 12 h. Both DFM increased TGP significantly in GS at 48 h. There was no difference in total VFA production. However, GS with and without probiotics produced significantly more propionic acid and less butyric acid than MS with and without probiotics. Adding P2 numerically reduced the total methane yield by 4–6% in both MS and GS. The fermentation duration of 48 h, used to determine maximum potential dOM, may give misleading results. This study showed that it is possible to standardize the methodology to achieve reproducibility of IVGPT results. Furthermore, the results suggest that the P2 DFM may have the potential to reduce CH4 production without affecting organic matter degradation.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
56
[1]
Adesogan, A.T. (2002, January 11–12). What are feeds worth? A critical evaluation of selected nutritive value methods. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Florida Ruminant Nutrition Symposium, Gainesville, FL, USA.
[2]
Menke "The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro" J. Agric. Sci. (1979) 10.1017/s0021859600086305
[3]
Menke "Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid" Anim. Res. Dev. (1988)
[4]
Tedeschi, L.O., Schofield, P., and Pell, A.N. (2008). The 4th Workshop on Modeling in Ruminant Nutrition: Application of the Gas Production Technique, Embrapa.
[5]
Cornou "A ring test of a wireless in vitro gas production system" Anim. Prod. Sci. (2013) 10.1071/an12091
[6]
Bannink "Design, implementation and interpretation of in vitro batch culture experiments to assess enteric methane mitigation in ruminants—A review" Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. (2016) 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.03.016
[7]
Hetta "Ranking of in vitro fermentability of 20 feedstuffs with an automated gas production technique: Results of a ring test" Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. (2005)
[8]
Davies "An automated system for measuring gas production from forages inoculated with rumen fluid and its use in determining the effect of enzymes on grass silage" Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. (2000) 10.1016/s0377-8401(99)00138-8
[9]
Rymer "Inter-laboratory variation of in vitro cumulative gas production profiles of feeds using manual and automated methods" Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. (2005) 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.04.029
[10]
Seo "Direct-fed microbials for ruminant animals" Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. (2010) 10.5713/ajas.2010.r.08
[11]
Durand "Probiotics in animal nutrition and health" Benef. Microbes (2009) 10.3920/bm2008.1002
[12]
Astuti "Changes in rumen fermentation and bacterial profiles after administering Lactiplantibacillus plantarum as a probiotic" Vet. World (2022) 10.14202/vetworld.2022.1969-1974
[13]
Pan "Effects of a Bacillus-based direct-fed microbial on in vitro nutrient digestibility of forage and high-starch concentrate substrates" Transl. Anim. Sci. (2022) 10.1093/tas/txac067
[14]
Dias "PSVII-3 Effects of Feeding Direct-fed Microbials on Digestibility and Rumen Fermentation Characteristics of Finishing Bos Indicus Cattle" J. Anim. Sci. (2022) 10.1093/jas/skac247.706
[15]
Cull, C., Singu, V.K., Cull, B.J., Lechtenberg, K.F., Amachawadi, R.G., Schutz, J.S., and Bryan, K.A. (2022). Efficacy of Lactobacillus animalis and Propionibacterium freudenreichii-based feed additives in reducing salmonella-associated health and performance effects in commercial beef calves. Antibiotics, 11. 10.3390/antibiotics11101328
[16]
Mazkour "Shekarforoush, S.S.; Basiri, S. The effects of supplementation of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus coagulans spores on the intestinal microflora and growth performance in rat" Iran. J. Microbiol. (2019)
[17]
Kan "Probiotics Bacillus licheniformis improves intestinal health of subclinical necrotic enteritis-challenged broilers" Front. Microbiol. (2021) 10.3389/fmicb.2021.623739
[18]
Oyebade, A.O., Lee, S., Sultana, H., Arriola, K., Duvalsaint, E., Nino De, G.C., Fernandez, M.I., Marroquin, P.L., Amaro1, F., and Ghedin, G.L. (2023). Effects of direct-fed microbial supplementation on performance and immune response of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., submitted.
[19]
Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition

P.J. Van Soest, J.B. Robertson, B.A. Lewis

Journal of Dairy Science 1991 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(91)78551-2
[20]
(2020, May 10). ANKOM Technology, Analytical Procedures & Support, Fiber Analyzer A200. Available online: https://www.ankom.com/analytical-methods-support/fiber-analyzer-a200.
[21]
(2023, February 17). Available online: https://www.ankom.com/analytical-methods-support/daisy-incubators.
[22]
Pandey "Interspecies and seasonal variations in macroalgae from the Nordic region: Chemical composition and impacts on rumen fermentation and microbiome assembly" J. Clean. Prod. (2022) 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132456
[23]
Pedersen "Effect of supplementing dairy goat diets with rapeseed oil or sunflower oil on performance, milk composition, milk fatty acid profile, and in vitro fermentation kinetics" Front. Vet. Sci. (2022)
[24]
Carro "Effect of nitrogen form (casein and urea) on the in vitro degradation of cell walls from six forages" J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (1999)
[25]
R Core Team (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available online: https://www.R-project.org/.
[26]
Dose-Response Analysis Using R

Christian Ritz, Florent Baty, Jens C. Streibig et al.

PLoS ONE 10.1371/journal.pone.0146021
[27]
Dhakal, R., Manuel, G.R., Einar, V.B.P., and Hanne, H.H. (2022). Effect of autochthonous Nepalese fruits on nutrient degradation, fermentation kinetics, total gas production and methane production in in-vitro rumen fermentation. Animals, 12. 10.3390/ani12172199
[28]
Groot "Multiphasic analysis of gas production kinetics for in vitro fermentation of ruminant feeds" Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. (1996) 10.1016/s0377-8401(96)01012-7
[29]
McDonald "The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage" J. Anim. Sci. (Camb.) (1979)
[30]
Douglas "Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4" J. Stat. Softw. (2015)
[31]
Makkar "In vitro gas production: A technique revisited" J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (1997) 10.1111/j.1439-0396.1997.tb00734.x
[32]
Volden, H. (2011). NorFor—The Nordic Feed Evaluation System, Wageningen Academic Publishers. 10.3920/978-90-8686-718-9
[33]
Cattani "Relationships among gas production, end products of rumen fermentation and microbial N produced in vitro at two incubation times" Agric. Conspec. Sci. (2013)
[34]
Rabelo "Effects of Lactobacillus buchneri as a silage inoculant and as a probiotic on feed intake, apparent digestibility and ruminal fermentation and microbiology in wethers fed low-dry-matter whole-crop maize silage" Grass Forage Sci. (2018) 10.1111/gfs.12303
[35]
Ellis "The effect of lactic acid bacteria included as a probiotic or silage inoculant on in vitro rumen digestibility, total gas and methane production" Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. (2016) 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.10.016
[36]
Chen "Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus supplementation for improving in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics of cereal straws" Ital. J. Anim. Sci. (2017) 10.1080/1828051x.2016.1262753
[37]
Ridwan "The Use of Lactic Acid Bacteria as Ruminant Probiotic Candidates Based on In Vitro Rumen Fermentation Characteristics" Bul. Peternak. (2018)
[38]
Arowolo "Use of probiotics and botanical extracts to improve ruminant production in the tropics: A review" Anim. Nutr. (2018) 10.1016/j.aninu.2018.04.010
[39]
Qiao "Effect of supplemental Bacillus cultures on rumen fermentation and milk yield in Chinese Holstein cows" J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (2010)
[40]
Chiquette "Repeated ruminal dosing of Ruminococcus Flavefaciens NJ along with a probiotic mixture in forage or concentrate-fed dairy cows: Effect on ruminal fermentation, cellulolytic populations and in sacco digestibility" Can. J. Anim. Sci. (2007) 10.4141/a06-066
[41]
Jatkauskas "Effect of L. Plantarum, Pediococcus Acidilactici, Enterococcus Faecium and L. Lactis microbial supplementation of grass silage on the fermentation characteristics in rumen of dairy cows" Vet. Ir Zootech. (2007)
[42]
Getachew "Relationships between chemical composition, dry matter degradation and in vitro gas production of several ruminant feeds" Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. (2004) 10.1016/s0377-8401(03)00217-7
[43]
Mamuad "Effect of fumarate reducing bacteria on in vitro rumen fermentation, methane mitigation and microbial diversity" J. Microbiol. (2014) 10.1007/s12275-014-3518-1
[44]
Lamba "In vitro methane production and in sacco degradability of processed wheat and rice straws" Indian J. Anim. Nutr. (2014)
[45]
Moe "Methane production in dairy cows" J. Dairy Sci. (1979) 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(79)83465-7
[46]
Oyebade "Effects of probiotics on in-vitro digestibility, rumen fermentation, methane and gas production from a corn silage-based TMR" J. Dairy Sci. (2020)
[47]
Chang, M., Ma, F., Wei, J., Liu, J., Nan, X., and Sun, P. (2021). 2021. Live Bacillus subtilis natto promotes rumen fermentation by modulating rumen microbiota in vitro. Animals, 11. 10.3390/ani11061519
[48]
Ji "Effects of cellulase and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum on the fermentation quality, microbial diversity, gene function prediction, and in vitro rumen fermentation parameters of Caragana korshinskii silage" Front. Food Sci. Technol. (2023)
[49]
Maderal "PSI-19 Effect of Increasing Supplementation of Bacillus Spp. on in Vitro Ruminal Fermentation and Nutrient Digestibility" J. Anim. Sci. (2022) 10.1093/jas/skac247.655
[50]
"Comparison of in vitro gas production and nylon bag degradability of roughages in prediction of feed intake in cattle" Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. (1993) 10.1016/0377-8401(93)90150-i

Showing 50 of 56 references

Related

You May Also Like