journal article Open Access Jan 09, 2025

Bibliometric Analysis on ChatGPT Research with CiteSpace

Information Vol. 16 No. 1 pp. 38 · MDPI AG
View at Publisher Save 10.3390/info16010038
Abstract
ChatGPT is a generative artificial intelligence (AI) based chatbot developed by OpenAI and has attracted great attention since its launch in late 2022. This study aims to provide an overview of ChatGPT research through a CiteSpace-based bibliometric analysis. We collected 2465 published articles related to ChatGPT from the Web of Science. The main forces in ChatGPT research were identified by examining productive researchers, institutions, and countries/regions. Moreover, we performed co-authorship network analysis at the levels of author and country/region. Additionally, we conducted a co-citation analysis to identify impactful researchers, journals/sources, and literature in the ChatGPT field and performed a cluster analysis to identify the primary themes in this field. The key findings of this study are as follows. First, we found that the most productive researcher, institution, and country in ChatGPT research are Ishith Seth/Himel Mondal, Stanford University, and the United States, respectively. Second, highly cited researchers in this field are Tiffany H. Kung, Tom Brown, and Malik Sallam. Third, impactable sources/journals in this area are ARXIV, Nature, and Cureus Journal of Medical Science. Fourth, the most impactful work was published by Kung et al., who demonstrated that ChatGPT can potentially support medical education. Fifth, the overall author-based collaboration network consists of several isolated sub-networks, which indicates that the authors work in small groups and lack communication. Sixth, United Kingdom, India, and Spain had a high degree of betweenness centrality, which means that they play significant roles in the country/region-based collaboration network. Seventh, the major themes in the ChatGPT area were “data processing using ChatGPT”, “exploring user behavioral intention of ChatGPT”, and “applying ChatGPT for differential diagnosis”. Overall, we believe that our findings will help scholars and stakeholders understand the academic development of ChatGPT.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
48
[1]
Tian, S., Jin, Q., Yeganova, L., Lai, P.-T., Zhu, Q., Chen, X., Yang, Y., Chen, Q., Kim, W., and Comeau, D.C. (2024). Opportunities and challenges for ChatGPT and large language models in biomedicine and health. Brief. Bioinform., 25. 10.1093/bib/bbad493
[2]
Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education: Emerging Era of AI Chatbots

Sukhpal Singh Gill, Minxian Xu, Panos Patros et al.

Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems 2024 10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.06.002
[3]
Ouyang "Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback" Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (2022)
[4]
Jansen "Employing large language models in survey research" Nat. Lang. Process. J. (2023) 10.1016/j.nlp.2023.100020
[5]
Bollen "ChatGPT: Five priorities for research" Nature (2023) 10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7
[6]
Haleem "An era of ChatGPT as a significant futuristic support tool: A study on features, abilities, and challenges" BenchCouncil Trans. Benchmarks Stand. Eval. (2022) 10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100089
[7]
Achiam, J., Adler, S., Agarwal, S., Ahmad, L., Akkaya, I., Aleman, F.L., Almeida, D., Altenschmidt, J., Altman, S., and Anadkat, S. (2023). Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv.
[8]
Nan, D., Sun, S., Zhang, S., Zhao, X., and Kim, J.H. (2024). Analyzing behavioral intentions toward Generative Artificial Intelligence: The case of ChatGPT. Univers. Access Inf. Soc., 1–11. 10.1007/s10209-024-01116-z
[9]
Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samples

Lisa P. Argyle, Ethan C. Busby, Nancy Fulda et al.

Political Analysis 2023 10.1017/pan.2023.2
[10]
Rice "The advantages and limitations of using ChatGPT to enhance technological research" Technol. Soc. (2024) 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102426
[11]
Hämäläinen, P., Tavast, M., and Kunnari, A. (2023, January 23–28). Evaluating Large Language Models in Generating Synthetic Hci Research Data: A Case Study. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Hamburg Germany. 10.1145/3544548.3580688
[12]
Zhao, X., Nan, D., Chen, C., Zhang, S., Che, S., and Kim, J.H. (2023). Bibliometric study for environmental, social, and governance research using CiteSpace. Front. Environ. Sci., 10. 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1087493
[13]
Lim "Advancing knowledge through literature reviews: ‘what’, ‘why’, and ‘how to contribute’" Serv. Ind. J. (2022) 10.1080/02642069.2022.2047941
[14]
How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines

Naveen Donthu, Satish Kumar, Debmalya Mukherjee et al.

Journal of Business Research 2021 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
[15]
Zhang "MOOCs as a research agenda: Changes over time" Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. (2022)
[16]
Azam "Knowledge structuring for enhancing mechanical energy harvesting (MEH): An in-depth review from 2000 to 2020 using CiteSpace" Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. (2021) 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111460
[17]
CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature
Journal of the American Society for Information Sc... 2006 10.1002/asi.20317
[18]
Sabah "Google Scholar University Ranking Algorithm to Evaluate the Quality of Institutional Research" Computers. Mater. Contin. (2023)
[19]
Naseer "Lung Cancer Detection Using Modified AlexNet Architecture and Support Vector Machine" Computers. Mater. Contin. (2023)
[20]
Kim, J.H., and Nan, D. (2023). Machine learning and deep learning for social science: A bibliometric approach. Research Handbook on Artificial Intelligence and Communication, Edward Elgar Publishing. 10.4337/9781803920306.00022
[21]
Sun "Investigating the knowledge structure of research on massively multiplayer online role-playing games: A bibliometric analysis" Data Inf. Manag. (2022)
[22]
Seth "Evaluating chatbot efficacy for answering frequently asked questions in plastic surgery: A ChatGPT case study focused on breast augmentation" Aesthetic Surg. J. (2023) 10.1093/asj/sjad140
[23]
Xie "Aesthetic surgery advice and counseling from artificial intelligence: A rhinoplasty consultation with ChatGPT" Aesthetic Plast. Surg. (2023) 10.1007/s00266-023-03338-7
[24]
Mondal "Using ChatGPT for writing articles for patients’ education for dermatological diseases: A pilot study" Indian Dermatol. Online J. (2023) 10.4103/idoj.idoj_72_23
[25]
Mondal "ChatGPT in academic writing: Maximizing its benefits and minimizing the risks" Indian J. Ophthalmol. (2023) 10.4103/ijo.ijo_718_23
[26]
Newman "A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks" Soc. Netw. (2005) 10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.009
[27]
Sabé, M., Sulstarova, A., Chen, C., Hyde, J., Poulet, E., Aleman, A., Downar, J., Brandt, V., Mallet, L., and Sentissi, O. (2023). A century of research on neuromodulation interventions: A scientometric analysis of trends and knowledge maps. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 152. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105300
[28]
Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models

Tiffany H. Kung, Morgan Cheatham, Arielle Medenilla et al.

PLOS Digital Health 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198
[29]
Brown "Language models are few-shot learners" Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (2020)
[32]
Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy

Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Nir Kshetri, Laurie Hughes et al.

International Journal of Information Management 2023 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
[33]
ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education

Enkelejda Kasneci, Kathrin Sessler, Stefan Küchemann et al.

Learning and Individual Differences 2023 10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
[34]
Rudolph "ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?" J. Appl. Learn. Teach. (2023)
[35]
Pestana "Senior tourism–A scientometric review (1998–2017)" Tour. Rev. (2020) 10.1108/tr-01-2019-0032
[36]
Chopra "Past, present, and future of knowledge management for business sustainability" J. Clean. Prod. (2021) 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129592
[37]
Aiumtrakul, N., Thongprayoon, C., Arayangkool, C., Vo, K.B., Wannaphut, C., Suppadungsuk, S., Krisanapan, P., Garcia Valencia, O.A., Qureshi, F., and Miao, J. (2024). Personalized Medicine in Urolithiasis: AI Chatbot-Assisted Dietary Management of Oxalate for Kidney Stone Prevention. J. Pers. Med., 14. 10.3390/jpm14010107
[38]
Ma "Are users willing to embrace ChatGPT? Exploring the factors on the acceptance of chatbots from the perspective of AIDUA framework" Technol. Soc. (2023) 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102362
[39]
Kopplin "Chatbots in the workplace: A technology acceptance study applying uses and gratifications in coworking spaces" J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer. (2022) 10.1080/10919392.2023.2215666
[40]
Abdullahi "Learning to Make Rare and Complex Diagnoses With Generative AI Assistance: Qualitative Study of Popular Large Language Models" JMIR Med. Educ. (2024) 10.2196/51391
[41]
Hirosawa "ChatGPT-generated differential diagnosis lists for complex case–derived clinical vignettes: Diagnostic accuracy evaluation" JMIR Med. Inform. (2023) 10.2196/48808
[42]
Chen "Emerging trends and new developments in regenerative medicine: A scientometric update (2000–2014)" Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. (2014) 10.1517/14712598.2014.920813
[43]
"First systematic review on PM-bound water: Exploring the existing knowledge domain using the CiteSpace software" Scientometrics (2020) 10.1007/s11192-020-03547-w
[44]
Chen "Patterns of connections and movements in dual-map overlays: A new method of publication portfolio analysis" J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. (2014) 10.1002/asi.22968
[45]
Abbas "Investigating the applications of artificial intelligence in cyber security" Scientometrics (2019) 10.1007/s11192-019-03222-9
[46]
Borgman "The conundrum of sharing research data" J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. (2012) 10.1002/asi.22634
[47]
Baber "The beginning of ChatGPT–a systematic and bibliometric review of the literature" Inf. Learn. Sci. (2024)
[48]
The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis

Philippe Mongeon, Adèle Paul-Hus

Scientometrics 2016 10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
Related

You May Also Like

Albumentations: Fast and Flexible Image Augmentations

Alexander Buslaev, Vladimir I. Iglovikov · 2020

2,004 citations

Text Classification Algorithms: A Survey

Kamran Kowsari, Kiana Jafari Meimandi · 2019

1,198 citations

Modeling of Experimental Adsorption Isotherm Data

Xunjun Chen · 2015

421 citations