journal article Open Access May 17, 2022

Smartphone Moves: How Changes in Embodied Configuration with One’s Smartphone Adjust Conversational Engagement

Social Sciences Vol. 11 No. 5 pp. 219 · MDPI AG
View at Publisher Save 10.3390/socsci11050219
Abstract
Smartphones are often spontaneously used for personal purposes and during face-to-face gatherings. New terms like “phubbing” and “technoference” describe negative consequences of this behavior, but analysis of the actual everyday social situations where smartphones feature has largely been neglected. This article shows how simultaneous smartphone and conversational engagements are shaped by participants’ embodied conduct. A naturally occurring three-party conversation in a Finnish café is analyzed in detail to show how changes in embodied user–smartphone configuration impact ongoing conversation. User–smartphone configuration consists of the smartphone’s location, its physical relation to its user’s hands, and its screen direction in relation to the user’s head. User-smartphone configuration can manifest a change in an interactive footing in conversation, function as a turn-holding device, and organize a change in the conversational state. New methods and concepts for studying smartphone use in social situations are introduced. “Smartphone positions” refers to the embodied user–smartphone configurations that are oriented as manifestations of degrees of user–device engagement. “Smartphone moves” are the changes in smartphone positions, and they carry sequential relevance. Increased smartphone engagement is seen as decreased conversational engagement and vice versa. Making interactive resources available for one engagement manifests as an accountable event of disengagement from another. Engagement and disengagement are argued to be a continuum rather than a contrast pair.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
77
[1]
adjoe GmbH (2022, February 21). Average Daily Time Spent by Users in the United States on Mobile Apps from October 2020 to March 2021, by Category (in Minutes). Chart. Available online: https://www-statista-com.libproxy.tuni.fi/statistics/1272859/us-mobile-apps-time-spent-daily/.
[2]
Arminen "Review Essay Mobile Communication Society?" Acta Sociologica (2007) 10.1177/0001699307083983
[3]
"Using media as involvement shields" Journal of Pragmatics (2014) 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.003
[4]
Berger "Do continuing states of incipient talk exist?" Journal of Pragmatics (2016) 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.10.009
[5]
Wright, James D. (2015). Ethnomethodology, General. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier. [2nd ed.].
[6]
DenBleyker, Rob (2022, February 21). Cyanide and Happiness 25.6.2010 [Comic Strip]. Available online: https://explosm.net/comics/2091/.
[7]
Tannen, Deborah, and Trester, Anna M. (2013). Bringing Mobiles into the Conversation: Applying a Conversation Analytic Approach to the Study of Mobiles in Co-Present Interaction. Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media, Georgetown University Press.
[8]
DiDomenico "Attending to the Mobile Text Summons: Managing Multiple Communicative Activities across Physically Copresent and Technologically Mediated Interpersonal Interactions" Communication Research (2018) 10.1177/0093650218803537
[9]
Ducharme, Jamie (2022, February 21). “Phubbing” Is Hurting Your Relationships. Here’s What It Is. TIME. Available online: http://time.com/5216853/what-is-phubbing/.
[10]
Dwyer "Smartphone use undermines enjoyment of face-to-face social interactions" Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (2018) 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.10.007
[11]
eMarketer (2022, February 21). Time Spent on Mobile Devices Every Day in the United States from 2014 to 2021, in Statista. Available online: https://www-statista-com.libproxy.tuni.fi/statistics/1045353/mobile-device-daily-usage-time-in-the-us/.
[12]
Ergul "Adjournments during TV watching: A closer look into the organisation of continuing states of incipient talk" Discourse Studies (2016) 10.1177/1461445615623904
[13]
Figeac "Video-ethnography of social media apps’ connection cues in public settings" Mobile Media and Communication (2018) 10.1177/2050157917747642
[14]
Finnish National Board on Research Integrity (2022, February 21). TENK Guidelines. The Ethical Principles of Research with Human Participants and Ethical Review in the Human Sciences in Finland. Available online: https://tenk.fi/sites/default/files/2021-01/Ethical_review_in_human_sciences_2020.pdf.
[15]
Fox, Barbara (1993). The Human Tutorial Dialogue Project/Barbara A Fox, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[16]
Garfinkel, Harold (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology, Prentice-Hall.
[17]
Goffman "On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction" Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes (1955) 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
[18]
Goffman, Erving (1963). Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings, Free Press.
[19]
Goffman "The Neglected Situation" American Anthropologist (1964) 10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00090
[20]
Goffman, Erving (1971). Relations in Public, Harper and Row.
[21]
Goffman, Erving (1981). Forms of Talk, University of Pennsylvania Press.
[22]
Restarts, Pauses, and the Achievement of a State of Mutual Gaze at Turn‐Beginning

Charles Goodwin

Sociological Inquiry 1980 10.1111/j.1475-682x.1980.tb00023.x
[23]
Goodwin, Charles (1981). Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers, Academic Press.
[24]
Goodwin "Unilateral Departure" Talk and Social Organisation (1987) 10.21832/9781800418226-009
[25]
Goodwin "Action and embodiment within situated human interaction" Journal of Pragmatics (2000) 10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00096-x
[26]
Holt, E., and Clift, R. (2006). Interactive Footing. Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/cbo9780511486654
[27]
Goodwin, Charles, and Goodwin, Marjorie H. (2005). Participation, Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 10.1002/9780470996522.ch10
[28]
Gray, Chris H., Figueroa-Sarriera, Heidi J., and Mentor, Steven (2020). Modified: Living as a Cyborg, Taylorand Francis. 10.4324/9781351107839
[29]
Haddington, Pentti, Keisanen, Tiina, Mondada, Lorenza, and Nevile, Maurice (2014). Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking, John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/z.187
[30]
Hampton "The Social Life of Wireless Urban Spaces: Internet Use, Social Networks, and the Public Realm" Journal of Communication (2010) 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01510.x
[31]
Have, Paul T. (2011). Doing Conversation Analysis, Sage Publications.
[32]
Henriksen, Ida M., Skaar, Marianne, and Tjora, Aksel (2020). The Constitutive Practices of Public Smartphone Use. Societies, 10. 10.3390/soc10040078
[33]
Heritage, John (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology, Polity Press.
[34]
Hume, David (1739). A Treatise of Human Nature, Clarendon Press. 10.1093/oseo/instance.00046221
[35]
Humphreys "Cellphones in public: Social interactions in a wireless era" New Media and Society (2005) 10.1177/1461444805058164
[36]
Humphreys "Mobiles in public: Social interaction in a smartphone era" Mobile Media and Communication (2021) 10.1177/2050157920927062
[37]
Ictech "Smartphones and Face-to-Face Interaction: Digital Cross-Talk During Encounters in Everyday Life" Symbolic Interaction (2019) 10.1002/symb.406
[38]
Jefferson, Gail (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. Conversation Analysis, John Benjamins. Available online: https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027295286-02jef. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
[39]
Jensen, Klaus B. (2016). Metamedium. The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect166
[40]
Laurier "Mediated Pedestrian Mobility: Walking and the Map App" Mobilities (2016) 10.1080/17450101.2015.1099900
[41]
Licoppe "‘Connected’ Presence: The Emergence of a New Repertoire for Managing Social Relationships in a Changing Communication Technoscape" Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space (2004) 10.1068/d323t
[42]
Licoppe "Gaze Patterns and the Temporal Organization of Multiple Activities in Mobile Smartphone Uses" Human-Computer Interaction (2018) 10.1080/07370024.2017.1326008
[43]
Ling, Richard (2008). New Tech, New Ties: How Mobile Communication is Reshaping Social Cohesion, MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7568.001.0001
[44]
Ling, Richard (2012). Taken for Grantedness: The Embedding of Mobile Communication into Society, MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/8445.001.0001
[45]
Greene, J. O., and Burleson, B. R. (2003). How to “Do Things” with Narrative: A Communication Perspective on Narrative Skill. Handbook of Communication and Social Interaction Skills, Routledge. 10.4324/9781410607133-23
[46]
Mantere, Eerik (2, January June). Smartphone Moves as Adjustments of Face-to-Face Engagement. Poster presented at 17th International Pragmatics Conference, Winterthur, Switzerland.
[47]
Mantere, Eerik, and Raudaskoski, Sanna (2017). Sticky Media Device. Media, Family Interaction and the Digitalization of Childhood, Edward Elgar Publishing. 10.4337/9781785366673.00018
[48]
Mantere, Eerik, Savela, Nina, and Oksanen, Atte (2021). Phubbing and Social Intelligence: Role-Playing Experiment on Bystander Inaccessibility. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18. 10.20944/preprints202108.0465.v1
[49]
Molina, Brett (2022, February 21). When our smartphones leave us out of touch. USA Today, Available online: https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2017/08/04/smartphones-distracted-walking-iphone-while-parenting-we-out-touch/519452001/.
[50]
Multimodal resources for turn-taking

Lorenza Mondada

Discourse Studies 2007 10.1177/1461445607075346

Showing 50 of 77 references

Metrics
4
Citations
77
References
Details
Published
May 17, 2022
Vol/Issue
11(5)
Pages
219
License
View
Funding
Tampere University Library Award: 180160N
Cite This Article
Eerik Mantere (2022). Smartphone Moves: How Changes in Embodied Configuration with One’s Smartphone Adjust Conversational Engagement. Social Sciences, 11(5), 219. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11050219