Attributional &amp; Consequential Life Cycle Assessment: Definitions, Conceptual Characteristics and Modelling Restrictions

Thomas Schaubroeck; Simon Schaubroeck; Reinout Heijungs; Alessandra Zamagni; Miguel Brandão; Enrico Benetto

doi:10.3390/su13137386

journal article Open Access Jul 01, 2021

Attributional & Consequential Life Cycle Assessment: Definitions, Conceptual Characteristics and Modelling Restrictions

Thomas Schaubroeck

Simon Schaubroeck Reinout Heijungs Alessandra Zamagni Miguel Brandão

Enrico Benetto

Sustainability Vol. 13 No. 13 pp. 7386 · MDPI AG

View at Publisher Save 10.3390/su13137386

Abstract

To assess the potential environmental impact of human/industrial systems, life cycle assessment (LCA) is a very common method. There are two prominent types of LCA, namely attributional (ALCA) and consequential (CLCA). A lot of literature covers these approaches, but a general consensus on what they represent and an overview of all their differences seems lacking, nor has every prominent feature been fully explored. The two main objectives of this article are: (1) to argue for and select definitions for each concept and (2) specify all conceptual characteristics (including translation into modelling restrictions), re-evaluating and going beyond findings in the state of the art. For the first objective, mainly because the validity of interpretation of a term is also a matter of consensus, we argue the selection of definitions present in the 2011 UNEP-SETAC report. ALCA attributes a share of the potential environmental impact of the world to a product life cycle, while CLCA assesses the environmental consequences of a decision (e.g., increase of product demand). Regarding the second objective, the product system in ALCA constitutes all processes that are linked by physical, energy flows or services. Because of the requirement of additivity for ALCA, a double-counting check needs to be executed, modelling is restricted (e.g., guaranteed through linearity) and partitioning of multifunctional processes is systematically needed (for evaluation per single product). The latter matters also hold in a similar manner for the impact assessment, which is commonly overlooked. CLCA, is completely consequential and there is no limitation regarding what a modelling framework should entail, with the coverage of co-products through substitution being just one approach and not the only one (e.g., additional consumption is possible). Both ALCA and CLCA can be considered over any time span (past, present & future) and either using a reference environment or different scenarios. Furthermore, both ALCA and CLCA could be specific for average or marginal (small) products or decisions, and further datasets. These findings also hold for life cycle sustainability assessment.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

111

[1]

(2020, February 05). EU Commission Better Regulation Toolbox. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-making-process/planning-and-proposing-law/better-regulation-why-and-how/better-regulation-guidelines-and-toolbox/better-regulation-toolbox_en.

[2]

Hellweg "Emerging Approaches, Challenges and Opportunities in Life Cycle Assessment" Science (2014) 10.1126/science.1248361

[3]

Cucurachi "Digesting the Alphabet Soup of LCA" Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. (2018) 10.1007/s11367-018-1478-0

[4]

Porcelli, R., Marazza, D., Contin, A., and Righi, S. (2019, January 13–14). Subjectivity in the consequential approach to LCA: A review about the interpretation of the concept in literature. Proceedings of the XIII Convegno della Rete Italiana LCA, Rome, Italy.

[5]

Palazzo "A Review of Methods for Characterizing the Environmental Consequences of Actions in Life Cycle Assessment" J. Ind. Ecol. (2020) 10.1111/jiec.12983

[6]

Soimakallio "Attributional Life Cycle Assessment: Is a Land-Use Baseline Necessary?" Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. (2015) 10.1007/s11367-015-0947-y

[7]

Zamagni "Lights and Shadows in Consequential LCA" Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. (2012) 10.1007/s11367-012-0423-x

[8]

(2006). Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework, ISO. ISO 14040.

[9]

(2006). Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Requirements and Guidelines, ISO. ISO 14044.

[10]

Jolliet "Best Available Practice Regarding Impact Categories and Category Indicators in Life Cycle Impact Assessment" Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. (1999) 10.1007/bf02979403

[11]

Schaubroeck "Towards a General Sustainability Assessment of Human/Industrial and Nature-Based Solutions" Sustain. Sci. (2018) 10.1007/s11625-018-0559-0

[12]

Weidema "On the Boundary between Economy and Environment in Life Cycle Assessment" Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. (2018) 10.1007/s11367-017-1398-4

[13]

Life Cycle Assessment: Past, Present, and Future

Jeroen B. Guinée, Reinout Heijungs, Gjalt Huppes et al.

Environmental Science & Technology 2011 10.1021/es101316v

[14]

Heijungs, R. (1997). Economic Drama and the Environmental Stage: Formal Derivation of Algorithmic Tools for Environmental Analysis and Decision-Support from a Unified Epistemological Principle, Leiden University. 10.1007/bf02978414

[15]

Schaubroeck "Quantifying the Environmental Impact of an Integrated Human/Industrial-Natural System Using Life Cycle Assessment; A Case Study on a Forest and Wood Processing Chain" Environ. Sci. Technol. (2013) 10.1021/es4046633

[16]

Baitz "LCA’s Theory and Practice: Like Ebony and Ivory Living in Perfect Harmony?" Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. (2013) 10.1007/s11367-012-0476-x

[17]

Yang "A Unified Framework of Life Cycle Assessment" Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. (2019) 10.1007/s11367-019-01595-w

[18]

Suh "On the Uncanny Capabilities of Consequential LCA" Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. (2014) 10.1007/s11367-014-0739-9

[19]

Ekvall, T. (2000). Moral Philosophy, Economics, and Life Cycle Inventory Analysis, SAE International. 10.4271/2000-01-1479

[20]

Tillman "Significance of Decision-Making for LCA Methodology" Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. (2000) 10.1016/s0195-9255(99)00035-9

[21]

Weidema, B.P. (2003). Market Information in Life Cycle Assessment, Danish Enviromental Protection Agency. Enviromental Project No. 863.

[22]

Weidema "Market Aspects in Product Life Cycle Inventory Methodology" J. Clean. Prod. (1993) 10.1016/0959-6526(93)90007-x

[23]

Brandão, M., Martin, M., Cowie, A., Hamelin, L., and Zamagni, A. (2017). Consequential life cycle assessment: What, how, and why?. Encyclopedia of Sustainable Technologies, Elsevier. 10.1016/b978-0-12-409548-9.10068-5

[24]

Brander "Conceptualising Attributional LCA Is Necessary for Resolving Methodological Issues Such as the Appropriate Form of Land Use Baseline" Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. (2016) 10.1007/s11367-016-1147-0

[25]

Earles "Consequential Life Cycle Assessment: A Review" Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. (2011) 10.1007/s11367-011-0275-9

[26]

Ekvall "Attributional and Consequential LCA in the ILCD Handbook" Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. (2016) 10.1007/s11367-015-1026-0

[27]

Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment

Göran Finnveden, Michael Z. Hauschild, Tomas Ekvall et al.

Journal of Environmental Management 2009 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018

[28]

JRC-IES (2010). ILCD Handbook: General Guide for Life Cycle Assessment—Detailed Guidance, Publications Office of the European Union.

[29]

Plevin "Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate-Change Mitigation Benefits Misleads Policy Makers" J. Ind. Ecol. (2014) 10.1111/jiec.12074

[30]

Schuller, O., Baitz, M., Saint-Antonin, V., Collet, P., and Sabathier, J. (2020). Attributional vs. Consequential LCA Methodology Overview, Review and Recommendations with Focus on Well-to-Tank and Well-to-Wheel Assessments, EUCar.

[31]

UNEP-SETAC (2011). Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment databases—A basis for greener processes and products. Shonan Guidance Principles, UNEP-SETAC.

[32]

(2019, March 21). Attribution—Definition of Attribution in English by Oxford Dictionaries. Available online: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/attribution.

[33]

Plevin "Response to “On the Uncanny Capabilities of Consequential LCA” by Sangwon Suh and Yi Yang (Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., doi:10.1007/S11367-014-0739-9)" Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. (2014) 10.1007/s11367-014-0766-6

[34]

Rajagopal "A Step Towards a General Framework for Consequential Life Cycle Assessment" J. Ind. Ecol. (2017) 10.1111/jiec.12433

[35]

Sonnemann, G., Vigon, B., Baitz, M., Frischknecht, R., Krinke, S., Suppen, N., Weidema, B., and Wolf, M.-A. (2011). The context for global guidance principles for life cycle inventories. Global Guidance Principles for Life Cycle Assessment Databases—A Basis for Greener Processes and Products—“Shonan Guidance Principles”, UNEP-SETAC.

[36]

Schaubroeck "When to Replace a Product to Decrease Environmental Impact? A Consequential LCA Framework and Case Study on Car Replacement" Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. (2020) 10.1007/s11367-020-01758-0

[37]

Brander "Coupling Attributional and Consequential Life Cycle Assessment: A Matter of Social Responsibility" J. Clean. Prod. (2019) 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.066

[38]

(2020, March 02). Cambridge English Dictionary PHYSICAL—Meaning in the Cambridge English Dictionary. Available online: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/physical.

[39]

Hertwich "Understanding the Climate Mitigation Benefits of Product Systems: Comment on “Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate-Change Mitigation…" ” J. Ind. Ecol. (2014) 10.1111/jiec.12150

[40]

Mill, J.S. (1843). A System of Logic, Harper.

[41]

Statistics and Causal Inference

Paul W. Holland

Journal of the American Statistical Association 1986 10.1080/01621459.1986.10478354

[42]

Weidema, B., Grbeš, A., and Miguel, B. (2015, January 7–10). The implicit boundary conditions of attributional and consequential LCA. Proceedings of the ISIE Conference 2015: Taking Stock of Industrial Ecology, Guildford, UK.

[43]

Ekvall "System Boundaries and Input Data in Consequential Life Cycle Inventory Analysis" Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. (2004) 10.1007/bf02994190

[44]

Baustert, P., Schaubroeck, T., Navarrete Gutiérrez, T., Gibon, T., and Benetto, E. (2017, January 27–28). System boundaries in CLCA and the link with uncertainty—A case study on mobility policies in Luxembourg. Proceedings of the 23nd SETAC Europe LCA Case Study Symposium, Barcelona, Spain.

[45]

Schaubroeck "Is a Sustainability Assessment a Shot in the Dark? How to Deal with Its Nonquantified Uncertainty?" Environ. Sci. Technol. (2020) 10.1021/acs.est.0c00450

[46]

Clift "The Use of Life Cycle Assessment in the Support of Robust (Climate) Policy Making: Comment on “Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate-Change Mitigation …”" J. Ind. Ecol. (2014) 10.1111/jiec.12152

[47]

Hellweg "Discounting and the Environment Should Current Impacts Be Weighted Differently than Impacts Harming Future Generations?" Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. (2003) 10.1007/bf02978744

[48]

Levasseur "Valuing Temporary Carbon Storage" Nat. Clim. Chang. (2011) 10.1038/nclimate1335

[49]

Considering Time in LCA: Dynamic LCA and Its Application to Global Warming Impact Assessments

Annie Levasseur, Pascal Lesage, Manuele Margni et al.

Environmental Science & Technology 2010 10.1021/es9030003

[50]

Schaubroeck "A Revision of What Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment Should Entail: Towards Modeling the Net Impact on Human Well-Being" J. Ind. Ecol. (2017) 10.1111/jiec.12653

Showing 50 of 111 references

Cited By

140

Toward artificial intelligence and machine learning-enabled frameworks for improved predictions of lifecycle environmental impacts of functional materials and devices

T. Ibn-Mohammed, K. B. Mustapha · 2023

MRS Communications

Metrics

140

Citations

111

References

Details

Published: Jul 01, 2021
Vol/Issue: 13(13)
Pages: 7386
License: View

Authors

T

Thomas Schaubroeck

Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, 5 Avenue des Hauts-Fourneaux, Esch-sur-Alzette, 4362 Luxembourg, Luxembourg

S

Simon Schaubroeck

Suda Limited, Hong Kong, China; Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering Science, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 1-Box 2431, 3001 Leuven, Belgium

R

Reinout Heijungs

Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, Einsteinweg 2, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Operations Analytics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands

A

Alessandra Zamagni

Ecoinnovazione srl spin-off ENEA, Via Ferrarese 3, 40128 Bologna, Italy

M

Miguel Brandão

Division of Sustainability Assessment and Management, Department of Sustainable Development, Environmental Science and Engineering, School of Architecture and the Built Environment, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden

E

Enrico Benetto

Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, 5 Avenue des Hauts-Fourneaux, Esch-sur-Alzette, 4362 Luxembourg, Luxembourg

Cite This Article

Thomas Schaubroeck, Simon Schaubroeck, Reinout Heijungs, et al. (2021). Attributional & Consequential Life Cycle Assessment: Definitions, Conceptual Characteristics and Modelling Restrictions. Sustainability, 13(13), 7386. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137386

Attributional &amp; Consequential Life Cycle Assessment: Definitions, Conceptual Characteristics and Modelling Restrictions

You May Also Like

Attributional & Consequential Life Cycle Assessment: Definitions, Conceptual Characteristics and Modelling Restrictions