journal article May 01, 1986

Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity

View at Publisher Save 10.3758/bf03197692
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
57
[1]
Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are Lexical Decisions A Good Measure of Lexical Access? The Role of Word Frequency in the Neglected Decision stage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 340–357. 10.1037/0096-1523.10.3.340
[2]
Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The Locus Of Word-Frequency Effects in the Pronunciation Task: Lexical Access and/Or Production?Journal of Memory & Language,24, 89–106. 10.1016/0749-596x(85)90017-8
[3]
Balota, O. A., Pollatsek, A., &Rayner, K. (1985). The Interaction of Contextual Constraints and Parafoveal Visual Reformation In Reading.Cognitive Psychology,17, 364–390. 10.1016/0010-0285(85)90013-1
[4]
Bierwlsch, M. (1970). Semantics. In J. Lyons (Ed.),new Horizons in Linguistics. London: Penguin.
[5]
Carpenter, P. A., &Daneman, M. (1981). Lexical Retrieval And Error Recovery In Reading: A Model Based on Eye Fixations.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 137–160. 10.1016/s0022-5371(81)90357-1
[6]
Carpenter, P. A., &Just, M. A. (1975). Sentence Comprehension: A Psycholinguistic Processing Model of Verification.Psychological Review,82, 45–73. 10.1037/h0076248
[7]
Chumbley, J. I., &Balota, D. A. (1984). A Word’S Meaning Affects the Decision In Lexical Decision.Memory & Cognition,12, 590–606. 10.3758/bf03213348
[8]
Clark, H., &Chase, W. (1972). On the Process of Comparing Sentences Against Pictures.Cognitive Psychology,3, 472–517. 10.1016/0010-0285(72)90019-9
[9]
Clark, H., &Clark, E. (1977).Psychology and Language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
[10]
Conrad, C. (1974). Context Effects in Sentence Comprehension: A Study of The Subjective Lexicon.Memory & Cognition,2, 130–138. 10.3758/bf03197504
[11]
Cutler, A. (1983). Lexical Complexity and Sentence Processing. In G. B. Flores D’Arcais and R. J. Jarvella (Eds.),The Processes of Language Understanding. New York: Wiley.
[12]
Ehrlich, K., &Ravner, K. (1983). Pronoun Assignment and Semantic Integration During Reading: Eye Movements And Immediacy Of Processing.journal Of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 75–87. 10.1016/s0022-5371(83)80007-3
[13]
Hrlich, S. F., &Rayner, K. (1981). Contextual Effects on Word Perception And Eye Movements During Reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 641–655. 10.1016/s0022-5371(81)90220-6
[14]
Fodor, J. A., Garrett, M., Walker, E., &Parkes, C. (1980). Against Definitions.Cognition,8, 263–367. 10.1016/0010-0277(80)90008-6
[15]
Fodor, J. D., Fodor, J. A, &Garrett, M. (1975). The Psychological Unreality of semantic representations.Linguistic Inquiry,6, 515–531.
[16]
Frazier, L., &Rayner, K. (1982). Making and Correcting Errors During Sentence Comprehension: Eye Movements in the Analysis of Structurally Ambiguous sentences.Cognitive Psychology,14, 178–210. 10.1016/0010-0285(82)90008-1
[17]
Gels, M., &Winograd, E. (1974). Norms of Semantic Encoding Variability for fifty homographs.Bulletin Of The Psychonomlc Society,3, 429–431. 10.3758/bf03333516
[18]
Gorfein, D, Viviani, J., &Leddo, J. (1982). Norms as A Tool For The Study of homography.Memory & Cognition,10, 503–509. 10.3758/bf03197654
[19]
Hogaboam, Z., &Perfetti, C (1975). Lexical Ambiguity and Sentence Comprehension.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal behavior,14, 265–274. 10.1016/s0022-5371(75)80070-3
[20]
Holmes, V. M., &O’Regan, J. K. (1981). Eye Fixation Patterns During The Reading of Relative-Clause Sentences Journal of VerbalLearning & Verbal Behavior,20, 417–430 10.1016/s0022-5371(81)90533-8
[21]
Inhoff, A. W (1984). Two Stages of Word Processing During Eye Fixations in The Reading of Prose.Urnal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,3, 612–624. 10.1016/s0022-5371(84)90382-7
[22]
Inhoff, A. W. (1985). The Effect Of Factivity On Lexical Retrieval And Postlexical Processes During Eye Fixations In Reading.Journal Of Psycholinguistic Research,14, 45–56. 10.1007/bf01067473
[23]
Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986).Parafoveal Word Processing during Eye fixations in Reading. Effects of word Frequency. Manuscript submitted for publication.
[24]
Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1980) A Theory of Reading: From Eye Fixations to ComprehensionPsychological Review,87, 329–354 10.1037/0033-295x.87.4.329
[25]
Just, M. A., &Clark, H. (1973). Drawing Inferences from The Presuppositions and Implications of Affirmative and Negative Sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 21–31. 10.1016/s0022-5371(73)80057-x
[26]
Karttunen, L. (1971) Some Observations on Factivity.Papers M Linguistics,4, 55–69 10.1080/08351817109370248
[27]
Katz, J. (1972).semantic Theory. New York: Harper & Row.
[28]
Kintsch, W. (1974).The Representation of Meaning in Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[29]
Kiparsky, P., &Kiparsky, C. (1971) Fact. In D. Steinberg & L. Jakobovits (Eds.),Semantics (pp. 345–369). Cambridge, England Cambridge University Press.
[30]
Kliegl, R., Olson, R. K., &Davidson, B. J. (1982). Regression Analysis as a tool for Studying Reading Processes: Comment on Just and Carpenter’s eye Fixation TheoryMemory & Cognition, 10, 287–296. 10.3758/bf03197640
[31]
KČera, H., &Francis, W. (1967)Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English. Providence, Ri: Brown University Press.
[32]
Lakoff, R. (1973). Review of Progress in Linguistics.Language,49, 685–697. 10.2307/412359
[33]
Mayzner, M., &Tresselt, M. (1965a). Tables of Single-Letter and Digram Frequency Counts for Various Word-Length and Letter-Position Combinations.Psychonomic Monograph Supplements,1, 13–32
[34]
Mayzner, M., &Tresselt, M. (1965b). Tables Of Trigram Frequency Counts for Various Word-Length and Letter-Position Combinations.Psychonomic Monograph Supplements,1, 33–78.
[35]
Mehler, J., Segui, J., &Carey, P. (1978). Tails of Words: Monitormg Ambiguity.Journal Of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 29–35. 10.1016/s0022-5371(78)90507-8
[36]
Newman, J. E., &Dell, G. S (1978). The Phonological Nature of Phoneme Monitoring: A Critique of some ambiguity Studies.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 359–374. 10.1016/s0022-5371(78)90228-1
[37]
Norman, D., &Rumelhart, D. (1975)Explorations in Cognition San Francisco: Freeman.
[38]
Onifer, W., &Swinney, D. (1981). Accessing Lexical Ambiguities During Sentence Comprehension: Effects of Frequency of Meaning and Contextual Bias.Memory & Cognition,9, 225–236. 10.3758/bf03196957
[39]
The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading

Keith Rayner

Cognitive Psychology 1975 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5
[40]
Rayner, K. (1977). Visual Attention in Reading: Eye Movements Reflect Cognitive Processes.Memory & Cognition,4, 443–448. 10.3758/bf03197383
[41]
Rayner, K. (1978). Eye Movements in reading and Reformation Processing.Psychological Bulletin,85, 618–660. 10.1037/0033-2909.85.3.618
[42]
Rayner, K. (1984). Visual Selection in Reading, Picture Perception, and Visual Search: A Tutorial Review. In H. Bouma & D. W. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and Performance X (Pp. 67–96). Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.
[43]
Rayner, K., Carlson, M., &Frazier, L (1983). The interaction of Syntax and Semantics during Sentence Processing. Eye Movements M The Analysis of Semantically Biased Sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 358–374. 10.1016/s0022-5371(83)90236-0
[44]
Rayner, K., Slowiaczek, M L., Clifton, C., &Bertera, J H (1983) Latency of Sequential Eye Movements: Implications for Reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,9, 912–922. 10.1037/0096-1523.9.6.912
[45]
Schank, R. (1972). Conceptual Dependency: A Theory of Natural Language UnderstandingCognitive Psychology,3, 552–631 10.1016/0010-0285(72)90022-9
[46]
Schvaneveldt, R., Meyer, D., &Becker C (1976). Lexical Ambiguity, Semantic context, and Visual Word Recognition.Journal Of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,2, 243–256 10.1037/0096-1523.2.2.243
[47]
Seidenberg, M. S, Tanenhaus, M. K. Leiman, J M., &Bienkowski, M. (1982). Automatic Access of the Meanings of Ambiguous Words in Context: Some Limitations of Knowledge-Based processingCognitive Psychology,14, 489–537. 10.1016/0010-0285(82)90017-2
[48]
Sherman, M. (1973) Bound To Be Easier? The Negative Prefix and Sentence ComprehensionJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 76–84. 10.1016/s0022-5371(73)80062-3
[49]
Sherman, M. (1976). Adjectival Negation and the Comprehension of Multiply Negated SentencesJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 143 -157 10.1016/0022-5371(76)90015-3
[50]
Simpson, G. (1981). Meaning Dominance and Semantic Context In The Processing of Lexical Ambiguity.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 120–136 10.1016/s0022-5371(81)90356-x

Showing 50 of 57 references

Cited By
758
Cognition
Natural Language Processing
Journal of Memory and Language
ACM Transactions on Accessible Comp...
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS IN SENTENCE PROCESSING RESEARCH

Gregory D. Keating, Jill Jegerski · 2014

Studies in Second Language Acquisit...
Memory & Cognition
Space information is important for reading

Manuel Perea, Joana Acha · 2009

Vision Research
Scientific Studies of Reading
Brain Research
Psychological Review
Language and Cognitive Processes
The Quarterly Journal of Experiment...
Perception & Psychophysics
Metrics
758
Citations
57
References
Details
Published
May 01, 1986
Vol/Issue
14(3)
Pages
191-201
License
View
Cite This Article
Keith Rayner, Susan A. Duffy (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14(3), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197692
Related

You May Also Like

Feature memory and binding in young and older adults

Barbara l. Chalfonte, Marcia K. Johnson · 1996

516 citations

Features and their configuration in face recognition

James W. Tanaka, Joseph A. Sengco · 1997

417 citations