Intragenomic variation in the ITS rDNA region obscures phylogenetic relationships and inflates estimates of operational taxonomic units in genus Laetiporus

Daniel L. Lindner; Mark T. Banik

doi:10.3852/10-331

journal article Jul 01, 2011

Intragenomic variation in the ITS rDNA region obscures phylogenetic relationships and inflates estimates of operational taxonomic units in genus Laetiporus

Daniel L. Lindner Mark T. Banik

Mycologia Vol. 103 No. 4 pp. 731-740 · Informa UK Limited

View at Publisher Save 10.3852/10-331

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

73

[1]

10.1017/s0953756201003628

[2]

10.1128/aem.71.12.8966-8969.2005

[3]

10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00675.x

[4]

10.3852/mycologia.99.2.185

[5]

10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02743.x

[6]

———, Dickie IA, Mueller GM. 2005. A “dirty” business: testing the limitations of terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP) analysis of soil fungi. Mol Ecol 15:873–882.

[7]

10.2307/2399880

[8]

Banik MT, Burdsall HH Jr. 1999. Incompatibility between Laetiporus cincinnatus and L. sulphureus in culture. Mycotaxon 70:461–469.

[9]

10.2307/3761422

[10]

———, ———, Volk TJ. 1998. Identification of groups within Laetiporus sulphureus in the United States based on RFLP analysis of the nuclear ribosomal DNA. Folia Cryptogamie Estonica 33:9–14.

[11]

10.3852/09-044

[12]

10.1007/s00253-010-2585-4

[13]

10.1016/s0065-2296(05)42002-9

[14]

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03003.x

[15]

Burdsall HH Jr, Banik MT. 2001. The genus Laetiporus in North America. Harvard Pap Bot 6:43–55.

[16]

Chaw SM, Zharkikh A, Sung HM, Lau TC, Li WH. 1997. Molecular phylogeny of extant Gymnosperms and seed plant evolution: analysis of nuclear 18S rRNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol 14(1):56–68. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025702

[17]

10.1099/ijs.0.015412-0

[18]

10.1016/0959-437x(93)90012-e

[19]

10.1086/419073

[20]

10.1093/mollus/eyp043

[21]

Eun HM. 1996. Enzymology primer for recombinant DNA technology. San Diego: Academic Press Inc. 418 p.

[22]

Metagenomic and Small-Subunit rRNA Analyses Reveal the Genetic Diversity of Bacteria, Archaea, Fungi, and Viruses in Soil

Noah Fierer, Mya Breitbart, James Nulton et al.

Applied and Environmental Microbiology 10.1128/aem.00358-07

[23]

10.1073/pnas.0811003106

[24]

10.1101/gr.5457707

[25]

10.1016/j.funeco.2009.04.001

[26]

Harris DJ, Crandall KA. 2000. Intragenomic variation within ITS1 and ITS2 of freshwater crayfishes (Decapoda: Cambaridae): implications for phylogenetic and mi-crosatellite studies. Mol Biol Evol 17:284–291. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026308

[27]

10.1023/a:1020268020563

[28]

10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01333.x

[29]

10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.01891.x

[30]

10.1101/gr.084517.108

[31]

10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00767.x

[32]

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02990.x

[33]

10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04483.x

[34]

10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00742.x

[35]

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01376.x

[36]

Wrinkles in the rare biosphere: pyrosequencing errors can lead to artificial inflation of diversity estimates

Victor Kunin, Anna Engelbrektson, Howard Ochman et al.

Environmental Microbiology 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02051.x

[37]

10.1016/s1567-1356(03)00113-2

[38]

Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0

M.A. Larkin, G. Blackshields, N.P. Brown et al.

Bioinformatics 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404

[39]

10.1046/j.1365-2583.2002.00367.x

[40]

10.1086/302221

[41]

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01936.x

[42]

10.3852/07-124r2

[43]

10.3852/08-034

[44]

Bacterial phylogeny based on comparative sequence analysis (review)

Wolfgang Ludwig, Oliver Strunk, Sabine Klugbauer et al.

ELECTROPHORESIS 10.1002/elps.1150190416

[45]

Maleszka R, Clark-Walker GD. 1990. Magnification of the rDNA cluster in Kluyveromyces lactis. Mal Gen Genet 223:342–344. 10.1007/bf00265074

[46]

Mallatt J, Winchell CJ. 2002. Testing the new animal phylogeny: first use of combined large-subunit and small-subunit rRNA gene sequences to classify the protostomes. Mol Biol Evol 19:289–301. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004082

[47]

10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04478.x

[48]

10.1093/nar/7.1.69

[49]

Nilsson RH, Kristiansson E, Ryberg M, Hallenberg N, Larsson KH. 2008. Intraspecific ITS variability in the kingdom Fungi as expressed in the international sequence databases and its implications for molecular species identification. Evol Bioinform 4:193–201. 10.4137/ebo.s653

[50]

10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01618.x

Showing 50 of 73 references

Cited By

152

Non-biological synthetic spike-in controls and the AMPtk software pipeline improve mycobiome data

Jonathan M. Palmer, Michelle A. Jusino · 2018

PeerJ

Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi

Conrad L. Schoch, Keith A. Seifert · 2012

Proceedings of the National Academy...

Metrics

152

Citations

73

References

Details

Published: Jul 01, 2011
Vol/Issue: 103(4)
Pages: 731-740

Authors

US Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Center for Forest Mycology Research, One Gifford Pinchot Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53726

Cite This Article

Daniel L. Lindner, Mark T. Banik (2011). Intragenomic variation in the ITS rDNA region obscures phylogenetic relationships and inflates estimates of operational taxonomic units in genus Laetiporus. Mycologia, 103(4), 731-740. https://doi.org/10.3852/10-331

Intragenomic variation in the ITS rDNA region obscures phylogenetic relationships and inflates estimates of operational taxonomic units in genus Laetiporus

You May Also Like