United States: eight key themes in sociology of work

Arne L. Kalleberg; KEVIN T. LEICHT

doi:10.4000/nrt.10168

journal article Open Access Jan 01, 2021

United States: eight key themes in sociology of work

Arne L. Kalleberg KEVIN T. LEICHT

La Nouvelle Revue du Travail Vol. 19 · OpenEdition

View at Publisher Save 10.4000/nrt.10168

Abstract

This paper discusses the evolution of the sociology of work in the United States in the post-World War II period. We conceptualize the sociology of work broadly, as the study of jobs and organizations as well as its links to social stratification and inequality, political economy, and worker power, among other topics. We identify eight major enduring themes: work organization and the labor process; labor markets and careers; professions and professional work; employment relations; meaning of work; unions and worker power; workplace stratification and inequality; and labor force diversity. For each theme, we summarize some of the main issues, research questions, and studies that have revealed important aspects of work in the United States. These themes are likely to continue to be significant topics in the sociology of work in the United States in coming years.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

96

[1]

10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001

[2]

10.1515/9780691202112

[3]

Althauser, Robert P. and Arne L. L. Kalleberg, 1981 “Firms, Occupations and the Structure of Labor Markets: A Conceptual Analysis.” Pp. -119-149 in Ivar (Berg (ed.), Sociological Perspectives . on Labor Markets. New York: Academic.

[4]

Appelbaum, Eileen, Thomas Bailey, Peter Berg, and Arne L. Kalleberg. 2000. Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.

[5]

Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation

David H. Autor

Journal of Economic Perspectives 10.1257/jep.29.3.3

[6]

Avgar, Ariel, Monica Bielski Bielski Boris, Robert Bruno, and Wonjoon Chung. 2018. “Worker Voice and Union Revitalization: The Role of Contract .” Enforcement at SEIU.” Labor Studies Journal. 43:209-233 10.1177/0160449x18756739

[7]

Baron, James N. and William T. Bielby. 1980. “Bringing the Firms Back In: Stratification, Segmentation, and the Organization of Work.” American Sociological Review :45:737-765. 10.2307/2094893

[8]

10.1177/001979399905200403

[9]

Batt, Rosemary and Eileen Applebaum. 2013. “The Impact of Finanicalization on Management and Employment Outcomes.” Upjohn Institute Working Paper, No. 13-191. W.E. Upjohn Institute: Kalamazoo, Michigan.

[10]

Bernstein, Paul. 1997. American Work Values: Their Origin and Development. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

[11]

Labor and Monopoly Capital

Harry Braverman

Monthly Review 10.14452/mr-026-03-1974-07_1

[12]

10.2307/j.ctv10vm18m

[13]

What can machine learning do? Workforce implications

Erik Brynjolfsson, Tom Mitchell

Science 10.1126/science.aap8062

[14]

10.7591/9781501722394

[15]

10.7208/chicago/9780226217710.001.0001

[16]

10.2307/2094921

[17]

Cappelli Peter. 2008.

[18]

10.1515/9781503618183

[19]

Committee on Techniques for the Enhancement of Human Performance, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. 1999. The Changing Nature of Work: Implications for Occupational Analysis. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

[20]

10.1111/j.1467-856x.2009.00377.x

[21]

Davis, Gerald. 2016. The Vanishing American Corporation. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

[22]

Denice, Patrick, and Jake Rosenfeld. 2018. “Unions and Nonunion Pay in the United States, 1977–2015.” Sociological Science : 5: 541-561. 10.15195/v5.a23

[23]

Derber, Charles, William A. Schwartz and Yale Magrass. 1990. Power in the Highest Degree: Professionals and the Rise of the New Mandarin Order. New York: Oxford University Press.

[24]

10.4324/9781003069720

[25]

10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053420

[26]

Edwards, Richard. 1979. Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century. New York: Basic Books.

[27]

Frank, Robert and Philip Cook. 1996. The Winner-Take-All Society. New York: Free Press.

[28]

10.1177/2321022213501254

[29]

Frase, Peter. 2013. “Precariat: A Class or a Condition?” New Labor Forum : 22: 11–14. 10.1177/1095796013482888

[30]

Freeman, Richard B. 1994. Work Under Different Rules. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

[31]

Freeman, Richard B. and James L. Medoff 1984. What Do Unions Do? New York: Free Press.

[32]

The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?

Carl Benedikt Frey, Michael A. Osborne

Technological Forecasting and Social Change 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019

[33]

10.1126/science.1196783

[34]

Gordon, David M. 1972. Theories of Poverty and Underemployment. Lexington, MA: DC Heath.

[35]

Gorman, Elizabeth and Rebecca L. Sandefur. 2011. “Golden Age, Quiescence, and Revival: How the Sociology of Professions Became the Study of Knowledge-Based Work.” Work and Occupations, 38: 275–302. 10.1177/0730888411417565

[36]

Gorman, Elizabeth and Julie Kmec. 2009. “Hierarchical Rank and Women's Organizational Mobility: Glass Ceilings in Corporate Law Firms.” American Journal of Sociology, 114:1428-1474. 10.1086/595950

[37]

Handel, Michael J. 2004. Worker Skills and Job Requirements: Is there a Mismatch? Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.

[38]

10.1017/cbo9780511499333

[39]

10.2307/2095209

[40]

10.1177/0730888499026003003

[41]

Jarvis Benjamin F. and Xi Song. 2017. “Rising Intragenerational Occupational Mobility in the United States, 1969-2011.” American Sociological Review (82(3): 568-599. 10.1177/0003122417706391

[42]

Kalleberg, Arne L. 2011. Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s-2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation

[43]

10.1007/978-1-4899-3520-5

[44]

Kalleberg, Arne L. and Peter V. V. Marsden. 2013. “Changing Work Values in the United States, 1973-2006.” Social Science Research : 42: 255-270. 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.09.012

[45]

Kalleberg, Arne L. and Peter V. V. Marsden. 2015. “Transformation of the Employment Relationship,” in Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (eds.) Robert Scott and Stephen Kosslyn, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons. 10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0364

[46]

10.1177/0002716218822291

[47]

10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041249

[48]

10.1146/annurev.so.05.080179.002031

[49]

Kelly, Erin, Phyllis Moen, and Eric Tranby. 2011. “Changing Workplaces to Reduce Work-Family Conflict: Schedule Control in a White-Collar Organization.” American Sociological Review, 76: 265–290. 10.1177/0003122411400056

[50]

Kipping, Matthias and Ian Kirkpatrick. 2013. “Alternative Pathways of Change in Professional Services Firms: The Case of Management Consulting.” Journal of Management Studies, 50: 777-807. 10.1111/joms.12004

Showing 50 of 96 references

Metrics

4

Citations

96

References

Details

Published: Jan 01, 2021
Vol/Issue: 19
License: View

Authors

Pennsylvania State University

Cite This Article

Arne L. Kalleberg, KEVIN T. LEICHT (2021). United States: eight key themes in sociology of work. La Nouvelle Revue du Travail, 19. https://doi.org/10.4000/nrt.10168

United States: eight key themes in sociology of work

You May Also Like