The great US liquidity trap of 2009–2011: are we stuck pushing on strings?

Robert Pollin

doi:10.4337/roke.2012.01.04

journal article Oct 01, 2012

The great US liquidity trap of 2009–2011: are we stuck pushing on strings?

Robert Pollin

Review of Keynesian Economics Vol. 1 pp. 55-76 · Edward Elgar Publishing

View at Publisher Save 10.4337/roke.2012.01.04

Abstract

After the onset of the Great Recession in 2008, commercial banks in the United States began accumulating huge cash reserves in their accounts at the Federal Reserve. By the middle of 2011, reserves had reached $1.6 trillion, more than 10 percent of US GDP, an order of magnitude for commercial bank cash holdings that is without precedent. The key factor allowing banks to accumulate huge cash hoards was that the Federal Reserve had pushed the federal funds rate to near zero by the end of 2008, and held it there through 2011 and beyond. Over this same period, the non-corporate business sector obtained zero net credit. This overall pattern represents the most recent variant of reaching a ‘liquidity trap’ and trying to ‘push on a string.’ Under such circumstances, conventional central bank open-market operations are greatly weakened as an expansionary policy tool. This paper examines the experience of the liquidity trap in the United States since the Great Recession began and considers policy approaches for escaping the trap. I provide a critical review of various proposals for escaping liquidity traps, including raising the inflation target, depreciating the currency, and targeting long-term interest rates directly. I also propose two key innovative policies, an excess reserve tax for commercial banks and a major expansion in the federal loan guarantee program for smaller businesses.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

44

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

Blanchard, Olivier, Giovanni Dell'Ariccia, and Paolo Mauro (2010), ‘Rethinking Macroeconomic Policy,’ IMF Staff Position Notes, International Monetary Fund, February 12, http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/spn/2010/spn1003.pdf.

[22]

[23]

[24]

[25]

[26]

Keister, Todd and James McAndrews (2009), ‘Why are Banks Holding So Many Excess Reserves?’ Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report #380, July, http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/staff_reports/sr380.pdf.

[27]

[28]

[29]

[30]

[31]

[32]

New Bottom Line (2011), ‘The Win–Win Solution: How Fixing the Housing Crisis Will Create 1 Million Jobs,’ August, <docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B9c6kkQ4vZbeMzc3N2NmMGEtOThlZS00NTQzLWJhNDktMGZiN2EwYzRiZTU1&hl=en_US>.

[33]

[34]

Paglia, John K. (2011), ‘State of Small Business Report,’ Pepperdine Private Capital Markets Project, Fall. www.bschool.pepperdine.edu/privatecapital.

[35]

[36]

[37]

[38]

[39]

[40]

[41]

Saez, Emmanuel (2012), ‘Striking it Richer: The Evolution of Top Incomes in the United States,’ manuscript, Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~saez/saez-UStopincomes-2010.pdf.

[42]

Stockhammer, Engelbert and Robert Stehrer (2009), ‘Goodwin or Kalecki in Demand? Functional Income Distribution and Aggregate Demand in the Short Run,’ PERI Working Paper Series, #203, http://www.peri.umass.edu/fileadmin/pdf/working_papers/working_papers_201-250/WP203.pdf.

[43]

[44]

Metrics

11

Citations

44

References

Details

Published: Oct 01, 2012
Vol/Issue: 1
Pages: 55-76

Authors

R

Robert Pollin

Department of Economics and Political Economy Research Institute (PERI), University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA

Cite This Article

Robert Pollin (2012). The great US liquidity trap of 2009–2011: are we stuck pushing on strings?. Review of Keynesian Economics, 1, 55-76. https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2012.01.04

The great US liquidity trap of 2009–2011: are we stuck pushing on strings?

You May Also Like