journal article Jan 01, 2021

Body Composition and Metabolic Assessment After Motor Complete Spinal Cord Injury: Development of a Clinically Relevant Equation to Estimate Body Fat

View at Publisher Save 10.46292/sci20-00079
Abstract
Background:
Obesity is at epidemic proportions in the population with spinal cord injury (SCI), and adipose tissue (AT) is the mediator of the metabolic syndrome. Obesity, however, has been poorly appreciated in SCI because of the lack of sensitivity that body mass index (BMI) conveys for obesity risk in SCI without measuring AT.
Objectives:
The specific objectives were to compare measures of body composition assessment for body fat with the criterion standard 4-compartment (4C) model in persons with SCI, to develop a regression equation that can be utilized in the clinical setting to estimate fat mass (FM), and to determine cardiometabolic risk using surrogates of obesity in a current model of metabolic syndrome.
Methods:
Seventy-two individuals with chronic (>1 year) motor complete (AIS A and B) C5-L2 SCI were recruited over 3 years. Subjects underwent assessment with 4C using hydrostatic (underwater) weighing (UWW), dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and total body water (TBW) assessment to determine percent body fat (%BF); fasting glucose and lipid profiles, and resting blood pressure were also obtained. BMI, DXA, bioelectrical impedance analyses (BIA), BodPod, circumferences, diameters, lengths, and nine-site skinfold (SF) were assessed and validated against 4C. A multiple linear regression model was used to fit %BF (dependent variable) using anthropometric and demographic data that had the greatest correlations with variables, followed by a combined forward/backward stepwise regression with Akaike information criterion (AIC) to identify the variables most predictive of the 4C %BF. To allow for a more practical model for use in the clinical setting, we further reduced the AIC model with minimal loss of predictability. Surrogate markers of obesity were employed with metabolic biomarkers of metabolic syndrome to determine prevalence in persons with SCI.
Results:
Subject characteristics included age 44.4 ± 11.3 years, time since injury (TSI) 14.4 ± 11.0 years, BMI 27.3 ± 5.9 kg/m
2
; 59 were men and 13 were women. Sitting waist circumference (WCSit ) was 95.5 ± 13.1 cm, supine waist circumference (WCSup) was 93.4 ± 12.7 cm, and abdominal skinfold (ABDSF) was 53.1 ± 19.6 mm. Findings showed 4C %BF 42.4 ± 8.6%, UWW %BF 37.3 ± 9.7%, DXA %BF 39.1 ± 9.4%, BodPod %BF 33.7 ± 11.4%, nine-site SF %BF 37.8 ± 9.3%, and BIA %BF 27.6 ± 8.6%. A regression equation using age, sex, weight, and ABDSF provided

R
2

correlation of 0.57 with 4C %BF (
p
< .0001). Metabolic syndrome was identified in 59.4% of the sample.
Conclusion:
Body composition techniques to determine body fat are labor intensive and expensive for persons with SCI, and the regression equation developed against the criterion standard 4C model may allow clinicians to quickly estimate %BF and more accurately demonstrate obesity-induced cardiometabolic syndrome in this population.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
64
[1]
Gater DR, Farkas GJ, Tiozzo E. Pathophysiology of neurogenic obesity. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2021; 27( 1): 1– 10. doi:10.46292/sci20-00067. 10.46292/sci20-00067
[2]
Gater D, Farkas G. Alterations in body composition after SCI and the mitigating role of exercise. In:TaylorJA, ed.The Physiology of Exercise in Spinal Cord Injury.New York: Springer Nature; 2016: 175– 198.
[3]
Nash MS, Groah SL, Gater DR, . Identification and management of cardiometabolic risk after spinal cord injury clinical practice guideline for health care providers. J Spinal Cord Med. 2019; 42( 5): 643– 677.
[4]
Heyward VH, Wagner DR. Applied Body Composition Assessment. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2004.
[5]
Nash MS, Gater DR. Cardiometabolic disease and dysfunction following spinal cord injury: origins and guideline-based countermeasures. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am. 2020; 31( 3): 415– 436.
[6]
Nash MS, Gater DR. Cardiometabolic disease and dysfunction following spinal cord injury origins and guideline-based countermeasures. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am. 2020; 31( 3): 415–+.
[7]
Spungen AM, Adkins RH, Stewart CA, . Factors influencing body composition in persons with spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study. J Appl Physiol. 2003; 95( 6): 2398– 2407.
[8]
Nuhlicek DNR, Spurr GB, Barboriak JJ, . Body-composition of patients with spinal-cord injury. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1988; 42( 9): 765– 773.
[9]
Finsen V, Indredavik B, Fougner KJ. Bone mineral and hormone status in paraplegics. Spinal Cord. 1992; 30( 5): 343– 347.
[10]
Spungen AM, Wang J, Pierson RN, . Soft tissue body composition differences in monozygotic twins discordant for spinal cord injury. J Appl Physiol. 2000; 88( 4): 1310– 1315.
[11]
Buchholz AC, McGillivray CF, Pencharz PB. Differences in resting metabolic rate between paraplegic and able-bodied subjects are explained by differences in body composition. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003; 77( 2): 371– 378.
[12]
Bulbulian R, Johnson RE, Gruber JJ, . Body-composition in paraplegic male athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1987; 19( 3): 195– 201.
[13]
Holt RI. International diabetes federation re-defines the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2005; 7( 5): 618– 620.
[14]
Heymsfield SB, Lichtman S, Baumgartner RN, . Body-composition of humans – comparison of 2 improved 4-compartment models that differ in expense, technical complexity, and radiation exposure. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990; 52( 1): 52– 58.
[15]
Heyward VH. ASEP methods recommendation: body composition assessment. J Exerc Physiol Online. 2001; 4( 4): 1– 12.
[16]
Goldman R, Buskirk E. Body volume measurement by under-water weighing: description of a method. In:BrozekJ,HenschelA, eds.Techniques for Measuring Body Composition.Washington, DC: National Academey of Sciences, National Research Council; 1961: 78– 79.
[17]
Wilmore JH, Vodak PA, Parr RB, . Further simplification of a method for determination of residual lung-volume. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1980; 12( 3): 216– 218.
[18]
Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual . Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1988.
[19]
Williams DP, Going SB, Lohman TG, . Estimation of body-fat from skinfold thicknesses in middle-aged and older men and women – a multiple component approach. Am J Human Biol. 1992; 4( 5): 595– 605.
[20]
Lukaski HC, Johnson PE. A simple, inexpensive method of determining total body water using a tracer dose of D2O and infrared absorption of biological fluids. Am J Clin Nutr. 1985; 41( 2): 363– 370.
[21]
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33( 1): 159– 174.
[22]
Silveira SL, Ledoux TA, Robinson-Whelen S, . Methods for classifying obesity in spinal cord injury: a review. Spinal Cord. 2017; 55( 9): 812– 817.
[23]
Gater D, Clasey J. Body composition assessment in spinal cord injury clinical trials. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2006; 11( 3): 36– 49.
[24]
Clasey JL, Gater DR. A comparison of hydrostatic weighing and air displacement plethysmography in adults with spinal cord injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86( 11): 2106– 2113.
[25]
World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. WHO Tech Rep Series.2000( 894): i– xii, 1– 253.
[26]
Gater DR, Farkas GJ, Berg AS, . Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in veterans with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2019; 42( 1): 86– 93.
[27]
Yahiro AM, Wingo BC, Kunwor S, . Classification of obesity, cardiometabolic risk, and metabolic syndrome in adults with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2020; 43( 4): 485– 496.
[28]
Gibson AE, Buchholz AC, Martin Ginis KA. C-Reactive protein in adults with chronic spinal cord injury: increased chronic inflammation in tetraplegia vs paraplegia. Spinal Cord. 2008; 46: 616– 621.
[29]
Han SH, Lee BS, Choi HS, . Comparison of fat mass percentage and body mass index in koreans with spinal cord injury according to the severity and duration of motor paralysis. Ann Rehabil Med. 2015; 39( 3): 384– 392.
[30]
Cirnigliaro CM, LaFountaine MF, Dengel DR, . Visceral adiposity in persons with chronic spinal cord injury determined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015; 23( 9): 1811– 1817.
[31]
Yarar-Fisher C, Chen Y, Jackson AB, . Body mass index underestimates adiposity in women with spinal cord injury. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013; 21( 6): 1223– 1225.
[32]
Wahman K, Nash MS, Lewis JE, . Cardiovascular disease risk factors in persons with paraplegia: the Stockholm Spinal Cord Injury Study. J Rehabil Med. 2010; 42( 5): 489– 492.
[33]
Gater DR, Farkas GJ, Tiozzo E. Pathophysiology of neurogenic obesity. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2021; 27( 1): 1– 10. doi:10.46292/sci20-00067. 10.46292/sci20-00067
[34]
Gater D, Farkas G. Alterations in body composition after SCI and the mitigating role of exercise. In:TaylorJA, ed.The Physiology of Exercise in Spinal Cord Injury.New York: Springer Nature; 2016: 175– 198.
[35]
Nash MS, Groah SL, Gater DR, . Identification and management of cardiometabolic risk after spinal cord injury clinical practice guideline for health care providers. J Spinal Cord Med. 2019; 42( 5): 643– 677.
[36]
Heyward VH, Wagner DR. Applied Body Composition Assessment. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2004.
[37]
Nash MS, Gater DR. Cardiometabolic disease and dysfunction following spinal cord injury: origins and guideline-based countermeasures. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am. 2020; 31( 3): 415– 436.
[38]
Nash MS, Gater DR. Cardiometabolic disease and dysfunction following spinal cord injury origins and guideline-based countermeasures. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am. 2020; 31( 3): 415–+.
[39]
Spungen AM, Adkins RH, Stewart CA, . Factors influencing body composition in persons with spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study. J Appl Physiol. 2003; 95( 6): 2398– 2407.
[40]
Nuhlicek DNR, Spurr GB, Barboriak JJ, . Body-composition of patients with spinal-cord injury. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1988; 42( 9): 765– 773.
[41]
Finsen V, Indredavik B, Fougner KJ. Bone mineral and hormone status in paraplegics. Spinal Cord. 1992; 30( 5): 343– 347.
[42]
Spungen AM, Wang J, Pierson RN, . Soft tissue body composition differences in monozygotic twins discordant for spinal cord injury. J Appl Physiol. 2000; 88( 4): 1310– 1315.
[43]
Buchholz AC, McGillivray CF, Pencharz PB. Differences in resting metabolic rate between paraplegic and able-bodied subjects are explained by differences in body composition. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003; 77( 2): 371– 378.
[44]
Bulbulian R, Johnson RE, Gruber JJ, . Body-composition in paraplegic male athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1987; 19( 3): 195– 201.
[45]
Holt RI. International diabetes federation re-defines the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2005; 7( 5): 618– 620.
[46]
Heymsfield SB, Lichtman S, Baumgartner RN, . Body-composition of humans – comparison of 2 improved 4-compartment models that differ in expense, technical complexity, and radiation exposure. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990; 52( 1): 52– 58.
[47]
Heyward VH. ASEP methods recommendation: body composition assessment. J Exerc Physiol Online. 2001; 4( 4): 1– 12.
[48]
Goldman R, Buskirk E. Body volume measurement by under-water weighing: description of a method. In:BrozekJ,HenschelA, eds.Techniques for Measuring Body Composition.Washington, DC: National Academey of Sciences, National Research Council; 1961: 78– 79.
[49]
Wilmore JH, Vodak PA, Parr RB, . Further simplification of a method for determination of residual lung-volume. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1980; 12( 3): 216– 218.
[50]
Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual . Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1988.

Showing 50 of 64 references